- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04422405
Functional Changes in the Stomach and Esophagus After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass- OAGB (BiFLux)
June 3, 2025 updated by: Marko Kraljevic, MD, Spital Limmattal Schlieren
Functional Changes in the Stomach and Esophagus After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass- OAGB- BiFlux Trial
Evaluation of the functional changes in the stomach and esophagus of patients undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
300
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Urs Zingg, MD, Prof.
- Phone Number: +41 44 733 21 26
- Email: urs.zingg@spital-limmattal.ch
Study Locations
-
-
Zurich
-
Schlieren, Zurich, Switzerland, 8952
- Recruiting
- Limmattal Hospital
-
Contact:
- Urs Zingg, Prof.
- Phone Number: +41 44 733 21 26
- Email: urs.zingg@spital-limmattal.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- BMI> 35 kg/m2
- 2 years of controlled conservative obesity treatment without weight reduction
- patients should give their consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 2 years of conservative obesity treatment
- cancer
- cirrhosis Child-Pough score A
- Crohn's disease
- serious psychiatric disorder, which led to in-hospital treatment in psychiatric clinic in the past two years
- drug consumption
- non-compliance
- hiatal hernia > 4cm
- gastric pouch < 10cm
- Barett esophagus
- erosive esophagitis Grade C or D according to the Los Angeles Classification
- endoscopically proven gastric stricture
- acid exposition time > 6% (Lyon criteria)
- reflux episodes> 80 /24 hours (Lyon criteria)
- insufficient low esophageal sphincter according to manometry findings
- pathological findings in the impedance pH-metry (acid and non-acid reflux)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patients undergoing OAGB
|
The procedure is performed laparoscopically.
The "GIA" stapler divides the stomach at the junction of the body and antrum.
An Ewald tube, roughly the diameter of the esophagus, is passed by the anesthetist and held against the lesser curvature.
The division of the stomach against the tube is completed, with 5- 6 lines of staples.
The division of the stomach is parallel to the lesser curvature and up to the angle of His.
A point is selected on the small bowel about 200 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz.
The jejunal loop is brought up antecolic, and the Endo-GIA stapler is used to perform the anastomosis between the stomach and the small bowel at this point.
The distal end of the gastric tube is anastomosed to the side of the small bowel.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal ulcer rates
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
|
Marginal ulcer rates
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
|
Assessment of age as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
Age of participants will be measured in years.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of age as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
Age of participants will be measured in years
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of gender as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
The association between gender of participants (male/female) and incidence of marginal ulcers will be assessed.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of gender as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
The association between gender of participants (male/female) and incidende of marginal ulcers will be assessed.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of tobacco use as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who are smokers correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of tobacco use as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who are smokers correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of alcohol use as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who report alcohol use correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of alcohol use as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the the number of participants who report alcohol use correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who report NSAID use correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who report NSAID use correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of immunosuppressive medication usage as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who report immunosuppressive medication usage correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of immunosuppressive medication usage as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the number of participants who report immunosuppressive medication usage correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of Helicobacter pylori as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of Helicobacter pylori proven by biopsy correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of Helicobacter pylori as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of Helicobacter pylori proven by biopsy correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcer.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of GERD correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of GERD correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of diabetes mellitus as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of diabetes mellitus correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of diabetes mellitus as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of diabetes mellitus correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of dyslipidemia as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of dyslipidemia among the participants correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of dyslipidemia as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of dyslipidemia among the participants correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of CAD among the participants correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) as risk factor for marginal ulcer development
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
It will be assessed if the incidence of CAD among the participants correlates with the incidence of marginal ulcers.
|
5 years post surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total weight loss % (TWL)
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
|
Total weight loss % (TWL)
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
|
Excess weight loss % (EWL)
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
|
Excess weight loss % (EWL)
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
|
Total BMI loss (TBL)
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
|
Total BMI loss (TBL)
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
|
Excess BMI loss (EBL)
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
|
Excess BMI loss (EBL)
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
|
Late morbidity (>30 days)
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
|
Number of surgical complications according to Dindo-Clavien classification
|
30 days post surgery
|
|
Late morbidity (>30 days)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Number of surgical complications according to Dindo-Clavien classification
|
5 years
|
|
Incidence of gastroesopagheal reflux disease (GERD)
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings and classified according to the Los Angeles Classification
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Incidence of gastroesopagheal reflux disease (GERD)
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings and classified according to the Los Angeles Classification
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Incidence of Barrett's esophagus
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
based on biopsy findings
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Incidence of Barrett's esophagus
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
based on biopsy findings
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Changes of esophageal motor function
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
The esophageal motor function will be measured in mmHg via high-resolution manometry.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Changes of esophageal motor function
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
The esophageal motor function will be measured in mmHg via high-resolution manometry.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Esophageal acid or bolus exposure
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
Measured with impedance-pH Monitoring.
Acid exposure (%) is defined as the total time the pH is < 4 divided by the time monitored.
Bolus exposure (%) is defined as being analogous to acid exposure by adding the duration of all four reflux subcategories defined by the impedance, and dividing this value by the time monitored.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Esophageal acid or bolus exposure
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
Measured with impedance-pH Monitoring.
Acid exposure (%) is defined as the total time the pH is < 4 divided by the time monitored.
Bolus exposure (%) is defined as being analogous to acid exposure by adding the duration of all four reflux subcategories defined by the impedance, and dividing this value by the time monitored.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Number of acid or alcaline reflux events
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
Measured with impedance-pH Monitoring.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Number of acid or alcaline reflux events
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
Measured with impedance-pH Monitoring.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Gastrointestinal quality of life (QoL): GIQLI
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
The gastrointestinal (QoL) will be measured using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).
The GIQLI is a validated tool to assess health- related quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal disease or patients who undergo gastrointestinal operations.
Its scale is 0-128.
Higher values indicate a better quality of life outcome.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Gastrointestinal quality of life (QoL): GIQLI
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
The gastrointestinal (QoL) will be measured using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).
The GIQLI is a validated tool to assess health- related quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal disease or patients who undergo gastrointestinal operations.
Its scale is 0-128.
Higher values indicate a better quality of life outcome.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Obesity- related quality of life (QoL): BAROS
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
Obesity- related QoL will be measured with the BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System).
BAROS consists of a scoring table that includes three columns with the main areas of interest: weight loss, improvement of medical conditions, and QoL.
A maximum of three points is given in each domain to evaluate changes after medical intervention (maximum score is 9 points).
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Obesity- related quality of life: BAROS
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
Obesity- related QoL will be measured with the BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System).
BAROS consists of a scoring table that includes three columns with the main areas of interest: weight loss, improvement of medical conditions, and QoL.
A maximum of three points is given in each domain to evaluate changes after medical intervention (maximum score is 9 points).
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Reflux-associated symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
GERD symptoms will be measured with the Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ).
GERDQ has a scale between 0 and 18 points.
Increasing scores correlate with increasing severity of heartburn symptoms.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Reflux-associated symptoms
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
GERD symptoms will be measured with the Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ).
GERDQ has a scale between 0 and 18 points.
Increasing scores correlate with increasing severity of heartburn symptoms.
|
5 years post surgery
|
|
Reflux-associated quality of life (QoL): GERD-HRQL
Time Frame: 2 years post surgery
|
Reflux- associated QoL will be assessed with the Health-related QoL scale for GERD (GERD-HRQL).
The scale has 11 items, which focus on heartburn symptoms, dysphagia, medication effects and the patient's present health condition.
Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with a higher score indicating a better QoL.
|
2 years post surgery
|
|
Reflux-associated quality of life (QoL): GERD-HRQL
Time Frame: 5 years post surgery
|
Reflux- associated QoL will be assessed with the Health-related QoL scale for GERD (GERD-HRQL).
The scale has 11 items, which focus on heartburn symptoms, dysphagia, medication effects and the patient's present health condition.
Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with a higher score indicating a better QoL.
|
5 years post surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 28, 2035
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 28, 2035
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 4, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
June 9, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 6, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 3, 2025
Last Verified
June 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SLS-003
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on GERD
-
Baylor Research InstituteRecruiting
-
Ohio State UniversityCompleted
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalCompleted
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalRecruiting
-
Cinclus Pharma Holding ABCompleted
-
Korea United Pharm. Inc.CompletedGERDKorea, Republic of
-
Korea United Pharm. Inc.Completed
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknown
-
Turku University HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedGastric Bypass Surgery | Incretin Hormones Plasma LevelsEgypt
-
University Medical Center, KazakhstanCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruiting
-
The Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons...CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Obesity, MorbidKazakhstan
-
Ain Shams UniversitySuspended
-
Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, IsraelAssuta Medical CenterCompleted
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingSingle Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal BypassEgypt
-
Assuta Medical CenterCompleted
-
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 NordCompletedBariatric Surgery Candidate