Effects of Implementation of a Self-measurement Kiosk in the Emergency Department Waiting Room

June 9, 2020 updated by: Spoedopname

Effects of Implementation of Automated Pre-triage Based on a Self-measurement Kiosk With Questionnaire for Patients in the Emergency Department Waiting Room on Triage Time-stamps and Satisfaction of Use

In this study the participant will be invited to be seated in the self-measurement kiosk after registration in the Emergency department. In this kiosk, the participant will be measuring their own vitals and answering a short questionnaire regarding the reason for presentation. All these results are displayed on a screen for the triage nurse. Based on the results, high-risk patients will be highlighted on the screen, so they may be seen faster.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The questionnaire entails questions which would otherwise be asked by the triage nurse, regarding reason for presentation, fever, pain and and possible allergies. This is done through a touch-screen.

The vital signs and potential alarm symptoms from the (multilingual) questionnaire are being displayed with the pain score on a screen in the triage room and at the nurses desk. An adapted Early Warning Score (aEWS - without respiratory rate) is calculated from the vital signs. Abnormal results are being highlighted and carried up on the screen to the top position. This enables the triage nurse to pick up the sicker participants in the waiting room faster. The measurements are valid, so they do not have to be repeated by the triage nurse.

Users will be contacted afterwards regarding satisfaction of use

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

757

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Spoedgevallendienst

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients presenting ambulatory at the Emergency Department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients presenting by ambulance / Emergency Medical Services

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: on-day
Use of the self-measurement kiosk: measurement of vital signs + completion of short questionnaire
Use of the self-measurement kiosk, with results forwarded to the triage nurse screens
Other Names:
  • BeWell kiosk
No Intervention: Off-day
No use of the self-measurement kiosk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Triage time-stamp 1
Time Frame: through study completion, average of 1 year
Shorter time to end of triage process: Time from registration to time of end of triage process (completion of electronic record)
through study completion, average of 1 year
Triage time-stamp 2
Time Frame: through study completion, average of 1 year
Shorter time to beginning of triage process: Time from registration to time of start of triage process (initiation of electronic record)
through study completion, average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to see physician
Time Frame: through study completion, average 1 year
Shorter time to see physician: Time from registration to start of medical assessment (first of record of physician care)
through study completion, average 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cathelijne Lyphout, MSc, Uz Gent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019/0315

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share - General Data Protection Regulation related

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergencies

Clinical Trials on Self-measurement kiosk

Subscribe