InterLeukin-7 to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Lymphopenic pAtients With COVID-19 Infection ( ILIAD-7-US-I ) (ILIAD-7-US-I)

March 30, 2022 updated by: Revimmune

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Study of Recombinant Interleukin-7 (CYT107) for Immune Restoration of Hospitalized Lymphopenic Patients With Coronavirus COVID-19 Infection. US Infectious Cohort

Comparison of the effects of CYT107 vs Placebo administered IM at 10μg/kg twice a week for three weeks on immune reconstitution of lymphopenic COVID-19 patients

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Approximately forty-eight (48) participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive

(a) Intramuscular (IM) administration of CYT107 at 10 μg/kg followed, after 72hrs of observation, by 10 μg/kg twice a week for 3 weeks (maximum 7administrations adjusted to patient's length of stay in the hospital) or (b)Intramuscular (IM) placebo (normal saline) at the same frequency. The aim of the study is to test the ability of CYT107 to produce an immune reconstitution of these patients and observe possible association with a clinical improvement.

This cohort excludes oncology patients on treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • University of Florida College of Medicine
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Missouri Baptist Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Rutgers Health
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook Medicine
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A written, signed informed consent, or emergency oral consent, by the patient or the patient's legally authorized representative, and the anticipated ability for participant to be re-consented in the future for ongoing Study participation
  2. Men and women aged ≥ 25 - 80 (included) years of age
  3. Hospitalized patients with two absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) ≤ 1000 cells/mm3, at two time points at least 24 hours apart, following HOSPITALIZATION:
  4. Hospitalized patients with moderate to severe hypoxemia requiring oxygen therapy at >4L per minute nasal cannula or greater to keep saturations >90%, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (e.g., BIPAP), or patients intubated / ventilated for respiratory failure
  5. Confirmed infection with COVID-19 by any acceptable test available / utilized at each site
  6. Willingness and ability to practice contraception regardless of the gender of the patient during 5 month after last drug exposure
  7. Private insurance or government / institution financial support (through CMS or other)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy or breast feeding
  2. ALT and/or AST > 5 x ULN
  3. Known, active auto-immune disease;
  4. Ongoing cancer treatment with chemotherapy / immunotherapy or any cancer therapy within last 3 months and/or ongoing
  5. Patients with past history of Solid Organ transplant
  6. Active tuberculosis, uncontrolled active HBV or HCV infection, HIV with positive viral load
  7. Hospitalized patients with refractory hypoxia, defined as inability to maintain saturation >85% with maximal available therapy for >6 hours
  8. Patients receiving any agent with immune suppressive effects, other than steroids at dosages less than 300 mg/day equivalent hydrocortisone and/or anti-IL-6R treatments like Tocilizumab or Sarilumab or anti-IL-1 treatment like Anakinra which should preferably be minimized
  9. Patients with baseline Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 6 at Hospital admission
  10. Patients showing an increase of the NEWS2 score by more than 6 points during the screening/ baseline period (48 to 72 hrs prior to first administration)
  11. Patients under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CYT107 Treatment
Intramuscular (IM) administration of CYT107 twice a week for 3 weeks
IM administration at 10μg/kg twice a week for three weeks and up to 7 administrations according to Hospital length of stay
Other Names:
  • Interleukin-7
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Intramuscular (IM) administration of Saline twice a week for 3 weeks
IM administration at 10μg/kg twice a week for three weeks and up to 7 administrations according to Hospital length of stay
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of lymphopenic (ALC≤1000/mm3) COVID-19 infected participants out to approximately 30 days following initial Study drug administration or Hospital discharge (HD), whichever occurs first
Time Frame: one month
A statistically significant increase of the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) from randomization to day 30 or Hospital Discharge
one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To obtain "clinical improvement" as defined by an improvement in a 11-points WHO score for Clinical Assessment, through day 30 or HD.
Time Frame: one month
to determine if CYT107 will improve the clinical status of hospitalized COVID-19 patients as measured by 11 steps WHO clinical improvement score
one month
frequency of secondary infections through day 45 compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
Incidence of secondary infections based on pre-specified criteria as adjudicated by the Secondary Infections Committee (SIC) through Day 45
45 days
length of hospitalization compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
Number of days of hospitalization during index hospitalization (defined as time from initial Study drug treatment through HD)
45 days
number of readmissions to ICU compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
Readmissions to ICU through Day 45
45 days
organ support free days compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
Organ support free days (OSFDs) during index hospitalization (This includes ventilator assistance free days)
45 days
Frequency of re-hospitalization through day 45 compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
Number of readmissions to the hospital through Day 45
45 days
All-cause mortality through day 45 compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
All-cause mortality through Day 45
45 days
Level of other known biomarkers of inflammation: D-dimer compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 30 days
Track and evaluate other known biomarkers of inflammation, D-dimer from baseline to day 30
30 days
Physiological status through NEWS2 evaluation compared to Placebo arm
Time Frame: 30 days
Evaluate improvement of the NEWS2 score value. Score form 0 to 4: NO Risk Score of 7 or more: High risk
30 days
a significant decline of SARS-CoV-2 viral load through day 30 or HD
Time Frame: one month
The decrease of SARS-CoV-2 viral load from measurements at baseline and days of treatment dose 4 and dose 5, Day 21 and Day 30 or HD (whichever occurs first)
one month
Length of stay in ICU compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 45 days
Number of days in ICU during index hospitalization
45 days
CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 30 days
Absolute numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts at time points indicated on the Schedule of Activities (SoA)through Day 30 or HD
30 days
level of other known biomarkers of inflammation: Ferritin compared to placebo a
Time Frame: 30 days
Track and evaluate other known biomarkers of inflammation, Ferritin, from baseline to day 30
30 days
Level of other known biomarkers of inflammation: CRP compared to placebo arm
Time Frame: 30 days
Level of other known biomarkers of inflammation: CRP compared to placebo arm
30 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety assessment through incidence and scoring of grade 3-4 adverse events
Time Frame: 45 days
Incidence and scoring of all grade 3-4 adverse events through Day 45 (using CTCAE Version 5.0) to assess safety
45 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Hotchkiss, MD PhD, Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on CYT107

3
Subscribe