The Efficacy of a 6-point Transscleral Suture Fixation of a 3-looped Haptics PC-IOL Implantation Through Scleral Pockets for Surgical Management for Microspherophakia

By comparing the preoperative data and postoperative data of 9 patients of microspherophakia, we concluded that the 6-point transscleral suture fixation of a 3-looped haptics posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) through scleral pockets was a feasible method of PC-IOL implantation in the surgical treatment of microspherophakia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A retrospective study was conducted on 9 patients (18 eyes) diagnosed with microspherophakia in Eye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from July 2016 to April 2020.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Microspherophakia was diagnosed and lens diameter<9mm;
  • The lens subluxation was beyond the range of one quadrant and glasses cannot correct the vision;
  • Lens dislocated into the anterior chamber;
  • Lens dislocation caused elevated intraocular pressure (IOP);
  • The lens contacted the corneal endothelium;
  • Cataract;
  • Corneal endothelial cell density>1000/mm2;
  • The fundus was normal without retinal detachment, severe macular disease and optic nerve atrophy;
  • There was possible improvement in postoperative visual acuity measured by retinometer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The lens is centered and the position of the lens is stable;
  • Glasses can correct the vision obviously;
  • The reason for the elevated IOP was independent with the lens;
  • A high possibility of corneal decompensation after surgery;
  • Fundus function was poor and it is not expected to improve the vision after surgery;
  • Combined with other ocular diseases which were not suitable for IOL implantation;
  • Combined with a systemic disease that the patient cannot tolerate the surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Microspherophakia
This is a non-interventional study(NIS). All the patients diagnosed as microspherophakia are included in the study and recieved intraocular lens implantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual function
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a decimal chart
6 month postoperation
Visual function
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) measured using a decimal chart
6 month postoperation
Intraocular pressure
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
intraocular pressure measured using non-contact tonometer
6 month postoperation
PCIOL tilt degree
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
PCIOL tilt degree measured using Ultrasound biomicroscope
6 month postoperation
PCIOL decentration distance
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
PCIOL decentration distance measured using Ultrasound biomicroscope
6 month postoperation
Endothelial cell density
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
Endothelial cell density was measured by specular microscopy
6 month postoperation
Anterior chamber depth
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
Anterior chamber depth measured using Ultrasound biomicroscope
6 month postoperation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe