- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04447157
The Efficacy of a 6-point Transscleral Suture Fixation of a 3-looped Haptics PC-IOL Implantation Through Scleral Pockets for Surgical Management for Microspherophakia
June 28, 2020 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
By comparing the preoperative data and postoperative data of 9 patients of microspherophakia, we concluded that the 6-point transscleral suture fixation of a 3-looped haptics posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) through scleral pockets was a feasible method of PC-IOL implantation in the surgical treatment of microspherophakia.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
9
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
10 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
A retrospective study was conducted on 9 patients (18 eyes) diagnosed with microspherophakia in Eye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from July 2016 to April 2020.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Microspherophakia was diagnosed and lens diameter<9mm;
- The lens subluxation was beyond the range of one quadrant and glasses cannot correct the vision;
- Lens dislocated into the anterior chamber;
- Lens dislocation caused elevated intraocular pressure (IOP);
- The lens contacted the corneal endothelium;
- Cataract;
- Corneal endothelial cell density>1000/mm2;
- The fundus was normal without retinal detachment, severe macular disease and optic nerve atrophy;
- There was possible improvement in postoperative visual acuity measured by retinometer.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The lens is centered and the position of the lens is stable;
- Glasses can correct the vision obviously;
- The reason for the elevated IOP was independent with the lens;
- A high possibility of corneal decompensation after surgery;
- Fundus function was poor and it is not expected to improve the vision after surgery;
- Combined with other ocular diseases which were not suitable for IOL implantation;
- Combined with a systemic disease that the patient cannot tolerate the surgery.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Microspherophakia
This is a non-interventional study(NIS).
All the patients diagnosed as microspherophakia are included in the study and recieved intraocular lens implantation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual function
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a decimal chart
|
6 month postoperation
|
Visual function
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) measured using a decimal chart
|
6 month postoperation
|
Intraocular pressure
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
intraocular pressure measured using non-contact tonometer
|
6 month postoperation
|
PCIOL tilt degree
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
PCIOL tilt degree measured using Ultrasound biomicroscope
|
6 month postoperation
|
PCIOL decentration distance
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
PCIOL decentration distance measured using Ultrasound biomicroscope
|
6 month postoperation
|
Endothelial cell density
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
Endothelial cell density was measured by specular microscopy
|
6 month postoperation
|
Anterior chamber depth
Time Frame: 6 month postoperation
|
Anterior chamber depth measured using Ultrasound biomicroscope
|
6 month postoperation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 10, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
June 20, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 23, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
June 25, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 30, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 28, 2020
Last Verified
June 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- xuwen2020-465
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.