- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04457271
Goal Management Training in Individuals With PTSD
February 3, 2023 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute
An EffectivenessTrial Examining a Novel Approach to Cognitive Remediation in Individuals With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
This study will evaluate the effect of a manualized treatment (Goal Management Training, or GMT) on the cognitive impairments associated with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), as well as any impact on PTSD symptems themselves.
Participants will be randomized to either GMT group treatment, or a wait list condition.
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PTSD has an emotional impact on individuals, but it is also associated with impaired cognitive functioning (e.g., processing speed, attention, executive functioning).
This study is an effectiveness trial investigating a cognitive remediation intervention (Goal Management Training, or GMT) that has been shown to improve the cognitive impairment observed in other populations (e.g., older adults).
The present study will investigate the impact of GMT in adults experiencing PTSD (including frontline healthcare workers suffering from PTSD related to the COVID-19 pandemic) and its associated cognitive impairment.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions - GMT, or a wait list condition (in which GMT will be postponed for approximately 21 weeks).
Due to the pandemic, this study will be conducted primarily online (i.e., online assessments and treatment, with optional fMRI scans - functional magnetic resonance imaging).
Once all assessments are complete, participants in the wait list condition will be able to begin GMT thelmselves.
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
- London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of PTSD as determined by our baseline assessment
- Due to online nature: must have access to (and ability to use) a computer/tablet with a working microphone and camera (or webcam), reliable access to a secure internet connection, and access to a quiet, private space for the assessments and group sessions.
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Fluency in written and spoken English
- must be resident of Ontario (due to restrictions of professional licenses)
Exclusion Criteria for those opting in to fMRI scan:
- any implants, conditions, etc. that do not comply with 7T (Tesla) fMRI research safety standards (e.g., pacemaker, pregnancy/possible pregnancy)
Exclusion Criteria for study in general:
- history of significant head injury/lengthy loss of consciousness (e.g., a Glasgow Coma Scale Score < 15 at the time of incident as assessed retrospectively by participant)
- significant untreated medical illness
- history of neurological or neurodevelopmental disorder
- history of any pervasive developmental disorder
- any medical disorder known to adversely affect cognition within the last 12 months
- lifetime bipolar or psychotic disorder
- alcohol/substance abuse or dependence within the last 3 months
- extensive narcotic use (e.g., fentanyl, oxycodone, etc.), use of anti-cholinergics, anti-psychotics, psychostimulants, or benzodiazepines
- ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) within the last 12 months
- significant dissociative disorder (as determined by our baseline assessment)
- suicide attempt in last 6 months
- pregnancy (due to impact of hormones on cognitive abilities)
- hearing or vision issues that would interfere with effective online participation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Goal Management Training (GMT)
Participants in this arm will attend 9 weekly, 2-hour group GMT appointments.
|
GMT is a structured, short-term cognitive remediation program with an emphasis on mindfulness and practice in planning and completion of goal-oriented behaviours.
The main objective of GMT is to help participants regain executive control in order to better define goals and monitor performance in achieving them.
Sessions include instructional material, interactive tasks, discussion of patients' real-life deficits, and homework assignments.
Mindfulness meditation is also incorporated for the purpose of developing the skill of bringing one's mind to the present to monitor ongoing behaviour, goal states, and the relationship between them, and for the development of attentional control.
The program incorporates real-life examples to illustrate goal attainment failures and successes, as well as in-session practice of complex tasks that mimic real-life tasks - typically a challenge for individuals with executive function deficits (e.g., planning and set-shifting tasks).
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Wait List
Participants in this arm will receive no treatment for approximately 21 weeks (at which point, they will be offered the same, standard GMT treatment).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) scores from baseline to post-treatment assessment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
A computer-based go/no-go task that requires participants to withhold behavioral response to a single, infrequent target presented amidst a background of frequent non-targets.
This task assesses inattentiveness, impulsivity, sustained attention, and vigilance.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) scores from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
A computer-based go/no-go task that requires participants to withhold behavioral response to a single, infrequent target presented amidst a background of frequent non-targets.
This task assesses inattentiveness, impulsivity, sustained attention, and vigilance.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Change in score on Tower Test (part of Millisecond's online cognitive battery) from baseline to post-treatment assessment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Assesses the participant's ability to act with forethought, and sequence behaviour in an orderly fashion to reach specific goals (i.e., executive functioning).
Similar to the Tower of London test.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Change in score on Tower Test (part of Millisecond's online cognitive battery) from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Assesses the participant's ability to act with forethought, and sequence behaviour in an orderly fashion to reach specific goals (i.e., executive functioning).
Similar to the Tower of London test.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) score from baseline to post-treatment assessment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
A 36-item self-report measure that assesses difficulties with emotion regulation across six domains.
A total score is derived by summing all the items - ranging from 36 to 180.
Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction in emotion regulation.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) score from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
A 36-item self-report measure that assesses difficulties with emotion regulation across six domains.
A total score is derived by summing all the items - ranging from 36 to 180.
Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction in emotion regulation.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score from baseline to post-treatment assessment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Gold standard, clinician administered PTSD assessment tool; min.
score=0, max=80, with higher scores representing greater PTSD symptoms
|
9 weeks
|
|
Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Gold standard, clinician administered PTSD assessment tool; min.
score=0, max=80, with higher scores representing greater PTSD symptoms
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Boyd JE, Lanius RA, McKinnon MC. Mindfulness-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of the treatment literature and neurobiological evidence. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2018 Jan;43(1):7-25. doi: 10.1503/jpn.170021. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
- Meusel LA, Hall GB, Fougere P, McKinnon MC, MacQueen GM. Neural correlates of cognitive remediation in patients with mood disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2013 Nov 30;214(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
- Lanius RA, Frewen PA, Tursich M, Jetly R, McKinnon MC. Restoring large-scale brain networks in PTSD and related disorders: a proposal for neuroscientifically-informed treatment interventions. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Mar 31;6:27313. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27313. eCollection 2015.
- McKinnon MC, Boyd JE, Frewen PA, Lanius UF, Jetly R, Richardson JD, Lanius RA. A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions. Neuropsychologia. 2016 Sep;90:210-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 1, 2024
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
July 7, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 8, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 3, 2023
Last Verified
February 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 10037 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)
- 116096 (REGISTRY: Western University's Research Ethics Board)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Only coded data will be shared with co-investigators who are registered with the study's ethics board application.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on PTSD
-
University of PittsburghCompletedPTSD | Non PTSDUnited States
-
COMPASS PathwaysNot yet recruitingPTSD | PTSD, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | PTSD Symptoms | PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
-
Valhalla Project NiagaraRecruiting
-
York UniversityRecruiting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Withdrawn
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompleted
-
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of TexasCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; D...Completed
Clinical Trials on Goal Management Training (GMT)
-
Lovisenberg Diakonale HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Oslo University Hospital; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Jan StubberudUniversity of Oslo; NYU Langone Health; University of Toronto; Rotman Research... and other collaboratorsCompletedExecutive Dysfunction | Spina Bifida | Cognitive DeficitsNorway
-
BaycrestCentre for Aging and Brain Health InnovationUnknownNeurocognitive Disorders | Cognitive Dysfunction | Mental Disorder | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Cognitive Disorder | Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
McMaster UniversityWorkplace Safety and Insurance BoardCompletedPost-Traumatic Stress DisorderCanada
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyOslo University Hospital; St. Olavs Hospital; Norwegian Cancer SocietyActive, not recruitingChildhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Childhood Non-Hodgkin LymphomaNorway
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentWithdrawnBrain Injuries, TraumaticUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterU.S. Department of EducationCompletedTraumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
BaycrestCentre for Aging and Brain Health InnovationCompletedAging | Cognitive DeclineCanada
-
BaycrestUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; McGill... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
St. Olavs HospitalOslo University HospitalCompleted