The Influence of the Greater Tuberosity Angle on the Clinical Outcome One Year Postoperative in Patients With a Rotator Cuff Tear (GTA)

December 14, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

GTA-The Influence of the Greater Tuberosity Angle on the Clinical Outcome One Year Postoperative in Patients With a Rotator Cuff Tear - a Comparative Study.

This retrospective study is to investigate the influence of the Greater Tuberosity Angle (GTA) in addition to CSA on patient outcome in patients with rotator cuff tear.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A tear of the rotator cuff is one of the most common disorders of the shoulder. It is assumed that a large Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) is associated with the occurrence of rotator cuff tears. This retrospective study is to investigate the influence of the Greater Tuberosity Angle (GTA) in addition to CSA on patient outcome in patients with rotator cuff tear.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients treated for traumatic or degenerative rotator cuff lesion at the University Hospital Basel between January 2015 and January 2019.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient after an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
  • 1 to 4 years postoperative
  • Presence of pre-operative radiography of the shoulder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Massive irreparable cuff tear
  • Chronically retracted tendons and atrophic rotator cuff muscles Partial arthroscopic repair
  • Absence of pre-operative radiography in neutral rotation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
rotator cuff lesion
patients treated for traumatic or degenerative rotator cuff lesion
Data is extracted from the existing medical records and from the Rotator Cuff Repair Database (RCR_USB). The GTA (determined as the angle between a "line parallel to the humerus diaphysis passing through the humeral head center of rotation and a line connecting the upper border of the humeral head to the most superolateral edge of the greater tuberosity") is determined.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Constant Score
Time Frame: 1 year (before surgery and 1 year after surgery)

This scoring system consists of four variables that are used to assess the function of the shoulder. The right and left shoulders are assessed separately.

The subjective variables are pain and activity of daily life (ADL) (sleep, work, recreation / sport) which give a total of 35 points. The objective variables are range of motion and strength which give a total of 65 Points (the higher the score the better the shoulder function).

1 year (before surgery and 1 year after surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohy Taha, Dr. med., Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-01201; ch20Taha2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical Trials on data analysis

3
Subscribe