Physiotherapeutic Case Studies in Frozen Shoulder Pathology (CH-Case)

January 11, 2022 updated by: GEMA LEÓN BRAVO

Physiotherapeutic Case Reports in Frozen Shoulder Pathology: Clinical Trial

The stiff shoulder presents symptoms such as pain, loss of mobility and strength, being more common the idiopathic origin associated to the female gender. The definitive diagnosis presents complications due to the number of etiologies that can cause it. Epidemiologically, it presents from 2 to 5% of medical incapacities in the working population. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous Neuromodulation together with Orthopedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) in comparison with Orthopedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) used in stiff shoulder.Design: Experimental clinical trial in 30 patients aged 21 to 76 years from a physiotherapy center divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=15) Percutaneous Neuromodulation + Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) Group 2 (n=15) Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The stiff shoulder is a pathology characterized by a biomechanical restriction of the active and passive movement of the shoulder, showing clinical pictures of local inflammation with a notorious hyper vascularization that helps the clinical manifestations painful flexion, stiffness, limitation of external rotation, pain over the lower cervical area or near the insertion of the deltoid muscle and pain when supporting the affected limb with body weight.

Etiologically there are idiopathic and external factors that cause disorders such as osteoarthritis, chronic subacromial bursitis, or rotator cuff tendinopathy. Likewise, trauma is involved in a secondary way as well as diseases such as Parkinson's, diabetes, thyroid disorders among others. These clinical factors present two types of diagnosis: primary idiopathic stiff shoulder and extrinsic stiff shoulder secondary to trauma or surgery.

Among the physiotherapeutic treatments provided are joint mobilizations, therapeutic exercises, deep Cyriax massage, osteopathic techniques, cryotherapy (inflammatory phase), thermotherapy (chronic phase), electrotherapy for pain and ultrasound.

From the economic point of view, it presents from 2 to 5% of the medical incapacities in the working population, being this disease one of the first 20 sick leaves that reaches up to 12 months, generating high public hospital expenses and difficulties for the business area. Due to the above, many patients enter the operating room as a quick option to return to normality. However, this option does not seem to be the best for this disease, since the hypomobility of the movement increases gradually and chronically, caused by the fibrotic processes in the anterior face of the capsule, generating long-term inability for the external rotation of the joint.

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of Percutaneous Neuromodulation together with Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) compared to Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) used in the stiff shoulder.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Andalucía
      • Córdoba, Andalucía, Spain, 14011
        • Gema León Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 76 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with difficulty in activities of daily living ABVD 35.
  • Patients with positive results in some of the physical examination tests.
  • Patients with a previous diagnosis by ultrasound imaging.
  • Patients with surgical intervention after 3 months of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mental disorders or deficits.
  • Patients with needle phobia (belonephobia).
  • Patients with recent surgery before 3 months of age.
  • Patients with previous dislocation of the affected shoulder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 1
15 patients in the experimental group of percutaneous neuromodulation together with orthopaedic manual therapy (Maitland and Mulligan)
A series of questions were asked to a number of patients with diagnoses related to primary idiopathic stiff shoulder and/or extrinsic stiff shoulder secondary to trauma or surgery. These patients are part of the physiotherapy clinic receiving the research. This questionnaire answers basic questions for the structure of the study such as age and sex, physical behaviour during the week, endurance, athletic disability, reason for attending the clinic, exploratory motor tests, etc. Subsequently, physiotherapeutic tests related to the pathology within the research were performed consisting of joint range, percentage of shoulder disability and pain scale.
Three treatment sessions of Percutaneous Neuromodulation (PNM) and Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) (Maitland and Mulligan) (group 1) and three treatment sessions of Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) (Maitland and Mulligan) (group 2) were performed at a rate of two sessions per month for three months. These therapies were compared with the clinical examination performed prior to each new session to verify changes in joint range, percentage of shoulder disability, strength and pain scale.
Age and sex were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The rest of the variables were expressed as mean, absolute and relative frequency. The chi-square test was used to analyse the differences between the examinations in terms of the time taken and the treatments used in the two groups. A confidence level of 95% was established, considering a value of p<0.05 as statistically significant.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 2
15 patients in the experimental group of orthopaedic manual therapy (Maitland and Mulligan).
A series of questions were asked to a number of patients with diagnoses related to primary idiopathic stiff shoulder and/or extrinsic stiff shoulder secondary to trauma or surgery. These patients are part of the physiotherapy clinic receiving the research. This questionnaire answers basic questions for the structure of the study such as age and sex, physical behaviour during the week, endurance, athletic disability, reason for attending the clinic, exploratory motor tests, etc. Subsequently, physiotherapeutic tests related to the pathology within the research were performed consisting of joint range, percentage of shoulder disability and pain scale.
Three treatment sessions of Percutaneous Neuromodulation (PNM) and Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) (Maitland and Mulligan) (group 1) and three treatment sessions of Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) (Maitland and Mulligan) (group 2) were performed at a rate of two sessions per month for three months. These therapies were compared with the clinical examination performed prior to each new session to verify changes in joint range, percentage of shoulder disability, strength and pain scale.
Age and sex were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The rest of the variables were expressed as mean, absolute and relative frequency. The chi-square test was used to analyse the differences between the examinations in terms of the time taken and the treatments used in the two groups. A confidence level of 95% was established, considering a value of p<0.05 as statistically significant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scale (EVA)
Time Frame: 3 months

The values of pain levels during the examination are reflected as follows:

0= No pain 1-2= Little pain 3-4= Moderate pain 5-6= Severe pain 7-8= Very severe pain 9-10= Unbearable pain

3 months
Rigid shoulder type
Time Frame: 3 months
Information on the type of stiff shoulder you have.
3 months
Daniels Scale
Time Frame: 3 months

Muscle function values during the scan are reflected as follows, with 0 being a negative value and 5 a positive value:

0= Muscle does not contract.

  1. Muscle contracts, but there is no movement.
  2. Muscle contracts and moves normally, but without resistance.
  3. Muscle contracts and resists to a good degree.
  4. Muscle contracts and resists to almost its full extent.
  5. The muscle contracts and resists at full amplitude.
3 months
Joint range
Time Frame: 3 months
The values of joint range during the examination are reflected by means of the joint range scale which emphasizes specific degrees for elevation, external rotation and internal rotation.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants in each physical therapy application
Time Frame: 3 months

Three reviews were carried out corresponding to the three months of treatment. During these three months, participants received two sessions per week, for a total of 24 sessions:

  • Group 1 (n=15) received the percutaneous neuromodulation treatment together with orthopedic manual therapy (Maitland and Mulligan).
  • Group 2 (n=15) received orthopedic manual therapy treatment (Maitland and Mulligan) only.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gema León Bravo, Physiotherap, Departamento de Enfermería, Farmacología y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, España
  • Study Chair: Jaime Rando Anaya, Physiotherap, Universidad de Córdoba

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 3, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ART-GLB-HOM-CONG
  • TFG-EFCH-2021 (REGISTRY: TFG-EFCH-2021)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The request for the data will be studied and considered upon prior and justified request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Articular; Rigid

Clinical Trials on First data analysis

3
Subscribe