- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04463641
Assessment of the Axone Micro Quadripolar Lead for Enhanced Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (ASTRAL-4LV)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a interventional, pivotal, prospective, single arm, open label, multicenter, international trial.
The device under investigation is the Axone system, consisting of:
- Axone 4LV: an ultrathin, lumenless, quadripolar, IS4-compatible lead designed for left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- Axone µGuide: a dedicated, permanently implantable micro catheter designed for implantation of the Axone 4LV lead.
The primary endpoint data will be used to support CE marking of the Axone system.
The primary endpoints will be evaluated at 6 months post-implantation. Subjects will be followed-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-implantation, then yearly until 4 years post-implantation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Anaïs Balland, MSc
- Phone Number: +33602000014
- Email: anais.balland@crm.microport.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Linz, Austria
- Kepler Universitätsklinikum
-
-
-
-
-
Annecy, France
- CH Annecy Genevois
-
Chambray-lès-Tours, France
- CHRU Hopital Trousseau
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France
- CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
-
Grenoble, France
- CHU Grenoble
-
Lille, France
- CHRU de Lille - Hopital Cardiologique
-
Rennes, France
- CHU Pontchaillou
-
Rouen, France
- CHU de Rouen
-
Toulouse, France
- CHU Toulouse
-
-
-
-
-
Hamburg, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
-
Heidelberg, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
-
Kiel, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
-
-
-
-
-
Brescia, Italy
- ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia
-
Naples, Italy
- Ospedale Pellegrini
-
Naples, Italy
- Ospedale Policlinico Federico II
-
-
-
-
-
Zwolle, Netherlands
- Isala Klinieken
-
-
-
-
-
Lisbon, Portugal
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte - Hospital De Santa Maria
-
Porto, Portugal
- Centro Hospitalar Universitario do Porto
-
-
-
-
-
Alicante, Spain
- Hospital Universitario General de Alicante
-
Valencia, Spain
- Hospital Universitario La Fe
-
Vigo, Spain
- Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) device implant according to the latest ESC (European Society of Cardiology) guidelines
- De-novo implant of a Platinium 4LV CRT-D device (or any newer 4LV CRT-D model manufactured by MicroPort CRM)
- Reviewed, signed and dated informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- LV lead previous implant attempt
- Upgrade to CRT from a previously implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or CRT device replacement
- Known allergy to contrast media used for imaging during cardiac catheterization
- Tricuspid valvular disease or any type of tricuspid replacement heart valve (mechanical or tissue)
- Severe renal failure (creatinine clearance according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula < 30ml/min/m²)
- Active myocarditis
- Stroke, myocardial infarction or cardiac revascularization within 40 days prior to implant
- Previous heart transplant or currently on heart transplant list
- Life expectancy less than 1 year
- Already included in another clinical study that could confound the results of this study
- Pre-menopausal women / women in childbearing age, including pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Less than 18 years old or under guardianship
- Incapacitated subject, inability to understand the purpose of the study, or to meet follow-up visits at the implanting site as defined in the protocol
- Diagnosis of drug addiction (substance use disorder)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Axone 4LV Lead
Subjects implanted with the Axone 4LV Lead
|
Implantation of the Axone 4LV Lead
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Safety co-primary endpoint, defined as Axone system related complication free rate at 6 months post implant
Time Frame: 6 months
|
A complication is defined as any Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) resulting in death or requiring invasive intervention.
Safety co-primary endpoint assessment will be based on independent event adjudication by a Clinical Event Committee (CEC).
|
6 months
|
Performance co-primary endpoint, defined as LV pacing success rate at 6 months post implant
Time Frame: 6 months
|
LV pacing success is defined as at least one LV pacing vector with:
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Bizone LV pacing success rate at 6 months post implant
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Bizone LV pacing success is defined as two distant pacing vectors with:
|
6 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Axone 4LV implantation success rate
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
|
Implantation duration
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
|
Fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Fluoroscopy time is measured in minutes
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Fluoroscopy dose
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Fluoroscopy dose is measured using dose area product (Gray.cm^2)
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Axone system handling assessment
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Implanters will be asked to fill in a handling questionnaire and record observations related to the use of the Axone system.
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Axone implanters' learning curve
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
This endpoint will be based on fluoroscopy time for implantation.
The effect of removing the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc implanted subjects on mean fluoroscopy time (per implanter and per site) will be calculated.
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Number of excitable myocardium areas at implant
Time Frame: At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
"Excitable myocardium areas" are areas that can be paced by the implanted Axone 4LV lead.
|
At implant, preferably within 15 days of enrollment
|
Effect of CRT therapy, in particular bizone pacing, on QRS parameters, at discharge and 6 months post implant
Time Frame: At discharge, within 7 days of implant, and at 6 months
|
The effect of monozone and bizone CRT pacing on duration of QRS is measured in milliseconds.
|
At discharge, within 7 days of implant, and at 6 months
|
Effect of CRT therapy, in particular bizone pacing, on Left Pre-Ejection Interval (LPEI), at discharge
Time Frame: At discharge, within 7 days of implant
|
LPEI (in milliseconds) is an electromechanical parameter that can be assessed using echocardiography.
|
At discharge, within 7 days of implant
|
Axone 4LV lead pacing threshold
Time Frame: Discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Pacing threshold is measured in Volts.
|
Discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Axone 4LV lead pacing impedance
Time Frame: Discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Pacing impedance is measured in Ohms.
|
Discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Presence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) with the Axone 4LV lead
Time Frame: Implant (preferably within 15 days of enrollment), discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
The presence of PNS will be assessed at 10V using an external pacing system analyzer at implant, or at pacing threshold +2V at other visits.
|
Implant (preferably within 15 days of enrollment), discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
|
Axone 4LV lead programming
Time Frame: Discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Lead programming will be reported using: (i) pacing amplitude (Volts), pulse width (milliseconds) and pacing vector(s) selected.
|
Discharge (within 7 days of implant), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Energy consumption associated with Axone 4LV lead
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Energy will be calculated using the formula: E=(pacing amplitude^2 x pulse width)/impedance.
Energy, pacing amplitude, pulse width and impedance are measured in Joules, Volts, milliseconds, and Ohms, respectively.
|
6 months
|
Axone system-related annual complication-free rate
Time Frame: 12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Definition of Axone system related complication is the same as for primary safety endpoint.
|
12 months, 24 months 36 months, 48 months
|
Clinical response to CRT at 12 months post implant
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Clinical response will be determined by looking at functional improvement, reverse remodelling, freedom from heart failure events, and rate of non-responders: (i) functional improvement is defined as improvement in ≥1 NYHA (New York Heart Association) class from baseline to 12 months. (ii) reverse remodelling is a ≥12% increase in left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi: LVESV [mL] and body surface area [m^2] will be combined to report LVESVi). (iii) freedom from heart failure events is defined as an absence of death or HF hospitalization. (iv) non-responders are all those who are not responders. A responder is defined as a subject that is not dead and who did not experience any HF hospitalization and that has a stable or improved NYHA class versus baseline. |
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Frédéric Anselme, MD, CHU de Rouen, France
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GMC, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 30;:
- Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. Epub 2005 Mar 7.
- Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Daubert C; REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) Study Group. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 2;52(23):1834-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.027. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
- Butter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Fleck E, Ding J, Yu Y, Huvelle E, Spinelli J; Pacing Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure II Study Group. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients. Circulation. 2001 Dec 18;104(25):3026-9. doi: 10.1161/hc5001.102229.
- Zeitler EP, Friedman DJ, Daubert JP, Al-Khatib SM, Solomon SD, Biton Y, McNitt S, Zareba W, Moss AJ, Kutyifa V. Multiple Comorbidities and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: MADIT-CRT Long-Term Follow-Up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 16;69(19):2369-2379. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.531.
- Healey JS, Hohnloser SH, Exner DV, Birnie DH, Parkash R, Connolly SJ, Krahn AD, Simpson CS, Thibault B, Basta M, Philippon F, Dorian P, Nair GM, Sivakumaran S, Yetisir E, Wells GA, Tang AS; RAFT Investigators. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: results from the Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT). Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):566-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.968867. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Daubert C, Behar N, Martins RP, Mabo P, Leclercq C. Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide. Eur Heart J. 2017 May 14;38(19):1463-1472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw270.
- Okamura H. Up-to-date cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Gen Fam Med. 2017 May 17;18(5):195-199. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.24. eCollection 2017 Oct.
- Macias A, Gavira JJ, Alegria E, Azcarate PM, Barba J, Garcia-Bolao I. [Effect of the left ventricular pacing site on echocardiographic parameters of ventricular dyssynchrony in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004 Feb;57(2):138-45. Spanish.
- Umar F, Taylor RJ, Stegemann B, Marshall H, Flannigan S, Lencioni M, De Bono J, Griffith M, Leyva F. Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study. Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1227-34. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv396. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
- Bonadei I, Vizzardi E, Gorga E, Carubelli V, Pagnoni M, Sciatti E, Raweh A, Cerini M, Bontempi L, Curnis A, Metra M. Role of the old and new echocardiographic technologies in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2016 Oct;64(5):572-80. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
- O'Brien T, Park MS, Youn JC, Chung ES. The Past, Present and Future of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Korean Circ J. 2019 May;49(5):384-399. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0114.
- Leclercq C, Burri H, Curnis A, Delnoy PP, Rinaldi CA, Sperzel J, Lee K, Calo L, Vicentini A, Concha JF, Thibault B. Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I. Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 14;40(35):2979-2987. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz109.
- Auricchio A, Heggermont WA. Technology Advances to Improve Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: What Clinicians Should Know. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jun;71(6):477-484. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 14. English, Spanish.
- Antoniadis AP, Behar JM, Sieniewicz B, Gould J, Niederer S, Rinaldi CA. A comparison of the different features of quadripolar left ventricular pacing leads to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Sep;14(9):697-706. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1369404. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
- Tomassoni G, Baker J, Corbisiero R, Love C, Martin D, Niazi I, Sheppard R, Worley S, Beau S, Greer GS, Aryana A, Cao M, Harbert N, Zhang S; Promote(R) Q CRT-D and Quartet(R) Left Ventricular Heart Lead Study Group. Postoperative performance of the Quartet(R) left ventricular heart lead. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):449-56. doi: 10.1111/jce.12065. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
- Crossley GH, Biffi M, Johnson B, Lin A, Gras D, Hussin A, Cuffio A, Collier JL, El-Chami M, Li S, Holloman K, Exner DV. Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.019. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
- Mittal S, Nair D, Padanilam BJ, Ciuffo A, Gupta N, Gallagher P, Goldner B, Hammill EF, Wold N, Stein K, Burke M. Performance of Anatomically Designed Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads: Results from the NAVIGATE X4 Clinical Trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1199-1205. doi: 10.1111/jce.13044. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- LAXI01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart Failure Stage CFrance
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Lancaster General HospitalLouise von Hess Medical Research InstituteEnrolling by invitationDiastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Giresun UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureTurkey
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
Clinical Trials on Implantation of the Axone 4LV Lead
-
Abbott Medical DevicesActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Block | Bradycardia | Syncope | Cardiomyopathies | Sinus Node DysfunctionUnited States, Singapore, France, India, Italy
-
LivaNovaTerminatedLV Lead | LV Therapy | LV Treatment | LV MicrocableFrance
-
Ann Marie ChikowskiMain Line HealthCompletedDilated Cardiomyopathy | Congestive Heart Failure | Ischemic Congestive CardiomyopathyUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedLeft Bundle-Branch Block | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionDenmark
-
LMU KlinikumCompletedTricuspid Valve Insufficiency | Echocardiography, Transesophageal | Pacemaker ComplicationGermany
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompleted
-
LMU KlinikumRecruitingTricuspid Regurgitation | Pacemaker ComplicationGermany
-
MicroPort CRMActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Ventricular Arrythmia | ICD | LeadSpain, Portugal
-
MicroPort CRMUnknownHeart Failure | Ventricular Arrythmia | ICD | LeadSpain, Italy, France, Portugal
-
Edwards LifesciencesPacific Clinical Research GroupCompleted