A Study of CG-806 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML or Higher-Risk MDS

March 5, 2025 updated by: Aptose Biosciences Inc.

A Phase 1a/b Trial of CG-806 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

This study is being done to evaluate the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of oral CG-806 (luxeptinib) for the treatment of patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (except APML), secondary AML, therapy-related AML, or higher-risk MDS, whose disease has relapsed, is refractory or who are ineligible for or intolerant of intensive chemotherapy or transplantation.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 1 a/b dose escalation study of safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of CG-806 in ascending cohorts (3+3 design) to determine the MTD or recommended dose in patients with relapsed or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (except APML), secondary AML, therapy-related AML, or higher-risk MDS whose disease has relapsed, is refractory or who are ineligible for or intolerant of intensive chemotherapy or transplantation. This is to be followed by a cohort expansion phase.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope National Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner Healthcare
    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07962
        • Atlantic Hematological Oncology Center
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospital of Cleveland
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Life expectancy of at least 3 months
  • ECOG Performance Status ≤ 2
  • Patients must be able to swallow capsules
  • Adequate hematologic parameters, unless cytopenias are disease caused
  • Adequate renal, liver and cardiac functions

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy
  • Uncontrolled leptomeningeal disease, auto-immune hemolytic anemia and uncontrolled and clinically significant disease related metabolic disorder
  • Clinically significant leukostasis
  • Treatment with other investigational drugs or receipt of cytotoxic therapy within 14 days prior to first study treatment administration
  • Receipt of cellular immunotherapeutic agents within 4 weeks prior to first study treatment administration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose Escalation and Expansion
Dose Escalation and Expansion; CG-806 will be given orally in ascending doses in patients with relapsed or refractory AML or higher-risk MDS (escalation cohort), until the maximum tolerated dose or candidate recommended Phase 2 dose is reached. Followed up by up to 50 patients enrolled in the expansion cohort at the recommended dose.
CG-806 will be given orally in ascending doses starting at 450 mg PO BID until the maximum tolerated dose or candidate recommended Phase 2 dose is reached.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of CG-806
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Patients will be assessed for adverse events during all cycles of treatment and for dose limiting toxicities in Cycle 1 (28-days). Dose escalation to a higher dose level will be considered if none of the first three patients who complete Cycle 1 (28-days) at a given dose level experience a dose limiting toxicity or if only 1 of 6 patients at a given dose level experience a dose-limiting toxicity.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Establish a CG-806 dose that maintains a biologically active plasma concentration
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the dose of CG-806 given orally every 12 hours daily that maintains a biologically active plasma concentration during 28-day cycles.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Establish a recommended dose for future development of CG-806
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To establish the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CG-806 for future clinical trials in patients with AML and other advanced myeloid malignancies.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics variables including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including maximum plasma concentration at various timepoints.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including minimum plasma concentration (Cmin)
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including minimum plasma concentration at various timepoints.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including area under the curve (AUC)
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including plasma concentration at various timepoints.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including volume of distribution
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including plasma concentration at various timepoints.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including clearance
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including plasma concentration at various timepoints.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including plasma half-life.
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics variables including plasma concentration at various timepoints.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the ability of CG-806 to modulate the expression or activity of pharmacodynamic biomarkers of drug effect.
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the ability of CG-806 to modulate the expression or activity of pharmacodynamic biomarkers of drug effect.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To assess patients for evidence of anti-tumor activity of CG-806 based on hematologic, bone marrow, physical examination, evaluations
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To assess patients for evidence of anti-tumor activity of CG-806 based on hematologic, bone marrow, physical examination, and FDG PET-CT imaging evaluations.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the Relative Bioavailability of Generation 3 formulation given to up to 18 patients on Cycle 1 Day -3 compared to Generation 1 formulation of study drug given to patients during Cycle 1.
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 pharmacokinetics variables including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the Relative Bioavailability of Generation 3 formulation given to up to 18 patients on Cycle 1 Day -3 compared to Generation 1 formulation of study drug given to patients during Cycle 1.
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 Pharmacokinetics variables including minimum plasma concentration (Cmin)
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the Relative Bioavailability of Generation 3 formulation given to up to 18 patients on Cycle 1 Day -3 compared to Generation 1 formulation of study drug given to patients during Cycle 1.
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 Pharmacokinetics variables including area under the curve (AUC)
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the Relative Bioavailability of Generation 3 formulation given to up to 18
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 Pharmacokinetics variables including volume of distribution
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
To determine the Relative Bioavailability of Generation 3 formulation given to up to 18
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 Pharmacokinetics variables including clearance
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 Pharmacokinetics variables including clearance
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Compare G1 to G3 Pharmacokinetics variables including plasma half-life.
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rafael Bejar, MD, PhD, Aptose Biosciences Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on CG-806

Subscribe