A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Drug Levels and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Chinese and Japanese Participants With Ring Sideroblasts Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions

October 10, 2023 updated by: Celgene

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Bridging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes(MDS) in Chinese and Japanese Subjects With Ring Sideroblasts Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) for the treatment of anemia due to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in Chinese and Japanese participants with ring sideroblasts who require Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusions.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Local Institution - 100
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Local Institution - 107
      • Guangzhou, China, 510060
        • Local Institution - 105
      • Guangzhou, China, 510080
        • Local Institution - 103
      • Guangzhou, China, 510515
        • Local Institution - 109
      • Hangzhou City, China, 310006
        • Local Institution - 102
      • Nanchang, China, 330006
        • Local Institution - 112
      • Nanjing, China, 210029
        • Local Institution - 108
      • Shanghai, China
        • Local Institution - 114
      • Shanghai, China, 200233
        • Local Institution - 101
      • Suzhu, China, 215006
        • Local Institution - 104
      • Tianjin, China, 300020
        • Local Institution - 106
      • Wenzhou, China, 325000
        • Local Institution - 111
      • Wuhan, China, 430022
        • Local Institution - 110
      • Kamogawa, Japan, 296-8602
        • Local Institution - 206
      • Mibu-Machi, Japan, 321-0293
        • Local Institution - 201
      • Ogaki, Japan, 503-8502
        • Local Institution - 208
      • Osaka, Japan, 545-8585
        • Local Institution - 205
      • Sagamihara, Japan, 252-0375
        • Local Institution - 204
      • Sendai, Japan, 980-8574
        • Local Institution - 207
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 141-8625
        • Local Institution - 202
    • Ehime
      • Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan, 790-8524
        • Local Institution - 209
    • Nagasaki
      • Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki, Japan, 852-8511
        • Local Institution - 203
    • Osaka
      • Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan, 5898511
        • Local Institution - 210

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Refractory or intolerant to, or ineligible for, prior Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment as defined by any one of the following: Refractory to prior ESA treatment, Intolerant to prior ESA treatment, or ESA ineligible.
  • previously treated with an ESA or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, both agents must have been discontinued ≥ 4 weeks prior to date of luspatercept treatment
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior therapy with disease modifying agents for underlying MDS disease
  • Known clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Serum aspartate aminotransferase/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) or alanine aminotransferase/serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≥ 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Luspatercept Administration
Specified dose on specified days
Other Names:
  • ACE-536

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 weeks
Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24
Week 1 through Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
RBC-TI ≥ 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24
Week 1 through Week 24
Reduction in Red Blood Cell (RBC) units transfused over 16 weeks compared to baseline
Time Frame: Week 9 through Week 24
Week 9 through Week 24
Modified hematologic improvement - erythroid (mHI-E) per International Working Group (IWG)
Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24
Week 1 through Week 24
Mean hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.0 g/dL
Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24
Week 1 through Week 24
Duration of RBC-TI
Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24
Week 1 through Week 24
Mean decrease in serum ferritin compared to baseline
Time Frame: Week 9 through Week 24
Week 9 through Week 24
Mean decrease in iron chelation therapy (ICT) use compared to baseline
Time Frame: Week 9 through Week 24
Week 9 through Week 24
Time to RBC-TI
Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24
Week 1 through Week 24
Progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Time Frame: Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through at least 3 years post first dose
Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through at least 3 years post first dose
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through at least 3 years post first dose
Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through at least 3 years post first dose
Incidence of type of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Screening through 42 days post last dose
Screening through 42 days post last dose
Incidence of frequency of AEs
Time Frame: Screening through 42 days post last dose
Screening through 42 days post last dose
Incidence of severity of AEs
Time Frame: Screening through 42 days post last dose
Screening through 42 days post last dose
Incidence of seriousness of AEs
Time Frame: Screening through 42 days post last dose
Screening through 42 days post last dose
Incidence of relationship of AEs to study treatment
Time Frame: Screening through 42 days post last dose
Screening through 42 days post last dose
Pharmacokinetics - Area under the curve (AUC)
Time Frame: Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through 1-year post first dose
Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through 1-year post first dose
Pharmacokinetics - Maximum plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax)
Time Frame: Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through 1-year post first dose
Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through 1-year post first dose
Frequency of Anti-drug antibodies (ADA)
Time Frame: Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through 1-year post first dose
Cycle1 Day1 (each cycle is 21 days) through 1-year post first dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 23, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Information relating to our policy on data sharing and the process for requesting data can be found at the following link:

https://www.celgene.com/research-development/clinical-trials/clinical-trials-data-sharing/

IPD Sharing Time Frame

See Plan Description

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

See Plan Description

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Luspatercept

3
Subscribe