Ultrasonography in Fracture Management (UFrac)

November 3, 2020 updated by: Anna Malwina Kamelska-Sadowska, University of Warmia and Mazury

The Use of Ultrasonography as a Diagnostic Tool for the Fracture Management

The bone fracture is usually diagnosed using an X-ray examination (the method of choice). However, in the case of the youngest patients (children and adolescents), it carries a potential risk of X-ray radiation exposure. What is important, an X-ray examination often fails to detect occult fractures or the early stages of a fracture with or without bone fusion. The literature emphasizes that from 2 to 36% of fractures may be unnoticed on X-ray images (false negative results). Therefore, additional possibilities are sought to improve the initial diagnosis.

It was shown that ultrasound could be used instead of the conventional imaging. The most important advantages of the usg are the absence of radiation exposure and greater availability. Moreover, the evaluator is able to show neovascularization during usg examination, which is important in bone healing process.

The aim of this study is (1) to validate the ultrasound imaging method for the fracture management; (2) to use an ultrasound imaging to assess the bone fracture and healing process during 8 weeks post injury.

This study consists of 50 patients aged 10-18 years old. The forearm fracture will be diagnosed using an X-ray imaging as well as an ultrasound imaging in the first 3 days post injury (initial study). It is planned to assess the healing process after 2, 4, 6 and/or 8 weeks post injury (comparative study).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The physiological fracture healing is based on the proper facilitation of regeneration and proliferation process. The bone fracture is usually diagnosed using an X-ray examination. However, an ultrasound imaging could be used instead of the conventional imaging. It is important in the case of the youngest patients. In these cases, the Hubner protocol/algorithm is often used. The patients with suspected fracture are advised to perform an ultrasound examination. Only after the confirmation of a suspected fracture, an X-ray examination should be performed.

Bone structure show typical characteristics, which make an ultrasonography an attractive medical diagnostic tool. Highly dense tissues such as bone reflect echoes and, therefore, appear bright white on an ultrasound (reflection from the cortical surface of the bone). This allows bone to be clearly distinguished from the surrounding soft tissues.

It was shown that ultrasound is a good diagnostic tool to assess the fracture healing process. The advantage of usg is that it is non-invasive, does not use ionizing radiation and is performed in a real-time.

The first study about the ultrasound in the diagnosis of fracture was carried out in 1988 in a group of 41 newborns with suspected clavicle fractures after complicated delivery. In all cases, the collarbone fracture was easily identifiable by an ultrasound in the first few days after the injury. Moreover, these data correlated with the conventional X-ray imaging.

It was also shown that the ultrasound method in pediatric patients can be used to visualize fractures, e.g. of the ribs or the sternum. In the acute phase, disturbances in the cortical layer of the bone as well as recent hematoma are easily observed. In the later phase, the formation of a callus (callus hypertrophy) could be diagnosed.

The aim of this study is (1) to validate the ultrasound imaging method using variables such as repeatability, interclass correlation coefficient (Qw), relative standard deviation (rSD) etc.; (2) to use an ultrasound imaging to assess the bone fracture and healing process during 8 weeks post injury.

This study consists of 50 patients aged 10-18 years old. The forearm fracture will be diagnosed using an X-ray imaging as well as an ultrasound imaging in the first 3 days post injury (initial study). It is planned to assess the proper healing process after 2, 4, 6 and/or 8 weeks post injury (comparative study).

Ultrasound examination:

  • the measurement of the humerus in two different projections (a-p and lateral). The distance from the acromion localized on the shoulder blade will be measured in order to repeat the examination in the same area.
  • radial bone examination in two different projections (a-p and lateral). The distance from the radiocarpal joint space will be measured in order to repeat the examination in the same area.
  • additionally, POWER Doppler assessment of callus neovascularization will be performed (each recording of the Doppler frame parameters for a given patient in order to repeat the examination at subsequent controls)

Experimental Design:

The fracture diagnosis is planned to be performed on the day of the injury, or at an interval of no more than 2-3 days post the injury as an initial examination and approx. during 8 weeks after the injury as a comparative examination (during the first control in an orthopedic clinic after 14 days, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and/or 8 weeks).

All the procedures performed in this study involving human participants will conform to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki (and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, revised in 2013) and follow the Adapted Physical Activity (APA) Ethics Standard.

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Stanislaw Popowski Regional Specialized Children's Hospital in Olsztyn, Poland (number of approval: 6 ZE//2020/WSSD; date of approval: 22 May 2020).

The experiment will be conducted with the understanding of each subject. All subjects as well as their parents will give written informed consent before children's participation in this study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Olsztyn, Poland, 10-719
        • Recruiting
        • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anna M Kamelska-Sadowska, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

50 patients admitted to the Orhopaedics and Trauma Ward of Prof. dr Stanislaw Popowski Regional Specialized Children's Hospital in Olsztyn, Poland with trauma to the upper extremity (from the proximal of the wrist to distal of the glenohumeral joint with evidence of pain, tenderness or swelling of the limb). Patients will be devided into two groups of radius or humerus bone (RadiusFracture and HumerusFracture groups). All patients will be recruited starting from July 2020. In all patients, first ultrasound and then standard plain radiography will be performed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the proximal end of the humerus and the distal end of the radius bones fractures
  • voluntary participation and consent to participate in the study signed by the parent and patient
  • declaration of participation in an X-ray and ultrasound examination during all 8 weeks post-injury
  • no medical contraindications to participate in the study program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous injuries of a similar body area
  • plaster immobilization
  • fractures referred for surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
HumerusFracture
Patients with humerus fracture
X-ray imaging as well as the ultrasonographic examination of the fracture and healing process in children will be performed. The validation of an usg will be done.
RadiusFracture
Patients with radial bone fracture
X-ray imaging as well as the ultrasonographic examination of the fracture and healing process in children will be performed. The validation of an usg will be done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change from Baseline in fracture management using x-ray imaging and medical ultrasound within 8 weeks post-injury
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The confirmation of fracture and healing process
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean Change from Baseline in adhesions development using medical ultrasound within 8 weeks post-injury
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The assessment of the development of adhesions (changes in soft tissue image)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean Change from Baseline in vascularization on POWER Doppler within 8 weeks post-injury
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean Change from Baseline in vascularization on POWER Doppler within 8 weeks post-injury
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean Change from Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale within 8 weeks post-injury
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The changes in pain scale will be assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and other specific for the selected injuries. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be' (from mild to severe pain).
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Anna M Kamelska-Sadowska, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation and Orthopedics, Collegium Medicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures, Bone

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonographic examination validation and testing

Subscribe