Comparison of Non-invasive and Invasive Blood Pressure Monitors

August 20, 2025 updated by: James Aaron Scott, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Comparison of a Standalone, Continuous, Non-invasive Blood Pressure Monitor (cNIBP) to Radial Arterial Catheterization in Patients Undergoing Surgery.

To compare a noninvasive and continuous radial artery blood pressure measurements utilizing ViTrack (developed by Dynocardia) to the standard of care radial artery catheterization, in patients undergoing surgery or those who are being cared for in the intensive care unit

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The ViTrack is strapped over the radial artery at the wrist.The ViTrack blood pressure cuff will be utilized to obtain continuous blood pressure (BP) readings throughout the surgical procedure or intensive care unit. This will allow us to compare BP readings between the non-invasive ViTrack device and the standard of care invasive intra-arterial catheters readings. Data collection from both the ViTrack and arterial catheter occur in the opposite wrists.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between the ages of 18 - 90 years age who are undergoing any surgery or in the intensive care unit and require intra-arterial catheterization for continuous BP measurement.
  • Patients having elective surgeries.
  • Patients having emergent surgeries, but only if research staff can have appropriate time to review study with patient and obtain signature on fact sheet prior to administration of medications that could affect coherency.
  • Patients who are able to review, verbalize understanding, and sign fact sheet. If patient has a health care proxy (HCP) or legal guardian, study will be reviewed, and signature of HCP or legal guardian will be obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to obtain consent from the patient, HCP or legal guardian
  • Greater than 10% difference in BP measurements between both arms prior to surgery
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Inability to insert a radial artery catheter
  • Any other condition that would increase the risk of participation in the study in the opinion of the site Investigator
  • Upper extremity arteriovenous haemodialysis shunt
  • Upper extremity amputation
  • Surgical position/draping precludes access to the wrist.
  • Wrist distortion or pain from arthritis
  • Prior trauma or surgery at the radial artery monitoring site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Wrist one
Wrist one will have both the ViTrack wrist cuff on one wrist
ViTrack is a continuous non-invasive wearable blood pressure cuff.
Active Comparator: Wrist Two
Wrist two and the radial artery catheter in the opposite wrist.
Radial artery catheterization is the standard of care for measuring blood pressure continuously throughout surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Up to 24 Hours

255 time points compared across continuous blood pressure (mmHg)

As per the FDA standard ANSI/AAMI SP10:2008 or the newly adopted ISO 81060-3:2022 standard, the mean error should be <5mmHg or <6mmHg and the standard deviation should be <8mmHg or <10mmHg respectively.

Up to 24 Hours
Comparison of Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Up to 24 Hours

255 time points compared across continuous blood pressure (mmHg)

As per the FDA standard ANSI/AAMI SP10:2008 or the newly adopted ISO 81060-3:2022 standard, the mean error should be <5mmHg or <6mmHg and the standard deviation should be <8mmHg or <10mmHg respectively.

Up to 24 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin Irritation
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours
Examining for local skin irritation
Up to 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James A Scott, DO, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H00019883

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Results and de-identified data will be securely shared with the sponsor. Sponsor may only see subject initials and study ID #. All other data will de-identified for review purposes and transferred via a secure method following the universities data sharing agreement with the sponsor.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available following data analysis within 12 months of study completion and will remain available for up to 3 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be accessed via secure methods outlined in a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Pressure

Clinical Trials on ViTrack

Subscribe