Intralesional Diode Laser Treatment of Fistulas in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

July 26, 2021 updated by: Gregor Jemec, Zealand University Hospital

Intralesional Diode Laser Treatment of Fistulas in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Protocol for a Within-person Randomised Trial

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common chronic skin disease where patients experience inflamed painful nodules and chronic suppurating tunnels under the skin that often leave mutilating scars. Symptoms typically begin during adolescence and patients struggle with pain, pruritus, malodor and purulent discharge compromising work life, physical exercise, and sexual habits. Consequently, the risk of social exclusion, anxiety, depression, and suicide is increased among patients suffering from HS.

Creams, tablets, and injections aim to gain disease control, yet are sometimes not sufficient. Once HS tunnels have formed, surgical intervention is often required.

Recently, emergence of flexible diode laser fibers has enabled treatment of tunnels from within. The technique has been tested for perianal tunnels and in few studies also for HS tunnels with promising results. Overall, the laser fiber technique is still new, and knowledge of optimal treatment settings is sparse. However, there is reason to believe that intralesional laser fiber treatment of HS tunnels may provide a new tissue-sparing alternative to conventional surgical techniques with a potential to produce fewer side effects, less scaring, shorter downtime after surgery and possibly, also improved inflammatory control.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of laser fiber treatment of HS tunnels.

Method The project is carried out at the Dermatological Department, Roskilde University Hospital under the leadership of principal investigator Professor DmSc Gregor Jemec.

A prospective cohort study of intralesional laser fiber treatment of HS fistulas is planned.

After signing informed consent, patients with two comparable HS tunnels in typical areas will draw lot to receive experimental laser fiber treatment of one tunnel while the other tunnel serve as control. Efficacy will be monitored by pain scores, ultrasound, clinical photos, clinical measures of disease activity, quality-of-life scores, and skin biopsies. Patients will be followed 2, 6, 12 weeks and if possible, also 52 weeks after treatment. After 12 weeks, patients will be offered laser fiber treatment or standard of care surgery to the untreated control tunnel.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and aim:

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common chronic skin disease that manifests by intermittent flare-ups of inflamed painful nodules that often leave mutilating scars, chronic suppurating tunnels and a changed microbiome compared to normal skin. Symptoms typically begin during adolescence and patients struggle with pain, pruritus, malodor and purulent discharge compromising work life, physical exercise, and sexual habits. Consequently, the risk of social exclusion, anxiety, depression and suicide is increased among patients suffering from HS.

Topical and systemic medical treatments, e.g. in the form of antibiotics, vitamin A derivates, immune-modulatory drugs or biological therapies aim to control inflammation. Once fistulas have formed, surgical intervention is often required. Present surgical therapies comprise surgical deroofing where the fistulas are cut open and left to heal, removal of specific pathological structures by ablative laser surgery or complete surgical removal en bloc of affected HS skin followed by skin grafting.

Recently, emergence of flexible diode laser fibers has enabled intra-lesional laser treatments of fistulas and the technique has been applied for e.g. perianal fistulas. Two prospective and one retrospective cohort studies evaluated a total of 265 patients treated with 1470 nm laser fiber surgery for perianal fistulas, demonstrating primary healing with absence of symptoms after one treatment in 40% to 71% of patients, a median healing time of 5 weeks, and long-term closure beyond 12 months in 71% of patients6. Intralesional laser fiber treatment has also been tested in HS tunnels. One study of concomitant 630 nm laser fiber treatment and photodynamic therapy has demonstrated a significant reduction in hidradenitis severity score and complete response in 47 % of patients after one treatment session.

Intralesional flexible laser fibers have also been tested in the treatment of HS tunnels without concomitant photodynamic therapy. One study investigated four sessions of 1064 nm intralesional diode laser therapy performed in local anesthesia. In a total of 20 patients, a significant reduction of Sartorius score and improved quality of life was demonstrated. No patients experienced neither worsening of disease nor complete cure and adverse effects were mild and transient. It was proposed, that intralesional laser treatment may elicit a decontaminating as well as an denaturing effect. Histological evaluation of endo-venous 1470 nm laser fiber treatment have demonstrated uniform coagulation without carbonization. Overall, the intralesional laser fiber technique is still new, and knowledge of optimal laser wave lengths, energy levels, number of treatments and treatment intervals is sparse. In addition, little is known about laser-tissue interactions in vivo as well as in vitro. However, there is reason to believe that intralesional laser fiber treatment of HS tunnels may provide a new tissue-sparing alternative to conventional surgical techniques with a potential to produce fewer side effects, less scaring, shorter downtime after surgery and possibly, also improved inflammatory control.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of 1470 nm laser fiber treatment of HS tunnels and add new knowledge of the microbiota as well as of laser-tissue interactions by in vivo ultrasound and in vitro histology.

Methods:

Study execution:

The project will be carried out at the Dermatological Department, Roskilde University Hospital under the leadership of principal investigator Professor Gregor Jemec, MD, DMSc. Senior doctor Ditte Marie Lindhardt Saunte, MD, PhD and Medical Doctor Elisabeth Hjardem Taudorf MD, PhD will run the project in cooperation with the established research group at the department

Study design:

A prospective cohort study of intralesional laser fiber treatment of HS fistulas is planned. Demographic data and information regarding prior treatments for HS will be collected in standardized case-report forms.

After signing informed consent, patients with HS tunnels in typical areas will be enrolled. Patients who have at least two suitable tunnels in typical HS areas will be invited to participate in the randomised within-person design to receive experimental laser fibre treatment. Two comparable HS tunnels from each patient will be selected enabling a subsequent randomisation to receive treatment or to serve as an intra-individual control, respectively.

Intervention:

The experimental treatment consists of one session of thermal coagulation with intralesional 1470 nm diode laser fibre in the entire length of one HS tunnel after injection of local anaesthetics (Mepivacaine-adrenaline). Both ends of tunnels selected for laser treatment must be accessible from the skin surface to ensure treatment of the entire tunnel.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
        • Recruiting
        • Zealand University Hospital Roskilde
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Legally competent women and men
  • aged 18 years or older
  • Two appropriate HS fistulas

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fistulas in areas that have previously received surgery
  • Allergy to lidocaine or adrenaline
  • Fragile physical health that cannot tolerate standard of care HS rescue therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1470 nm diode laser treatment of right HS-fistula
This is an intra-person study, comparing outcomes within participants. All participants will receive active 1470 nm intra-lesional diode laser treatment on one HS tunnel. Half of the enroled patients will receive active treatment of the right side, while the HS tunnel on the left side will be left as an untreated control.
Ten patients: 1470 nm intra-lesional diode laser treatment of right HS-tunnel randomized to active treatment.
Experimental: 1470 nm diode laser treatment of left HS-fistula
This is an intra-person study, comparing outcomes within participants. All participants will receive active 1470 nm intra-lesional diode laser treatment on one HS tunnel. Half of the enroled patients will receive active treatment of the left side, while the HS tunnel on the right side will be left as an untreated control.
Ten patients: 1470 nm intra-lesional diode laser treatment of left HS-tunnel randomized to active treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks from baseline
change in pain score on a visual analogue scale (where 0 is no pain =better; 10 is maximum pain = worse) for each individual HS-tunnel
At baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ultrasound
Time Frame: At baseline, and 12 weeks from baseline
percentage closure of fistulas measured by ultrasound
At baseline, and 12 weeks from baseline
Blinded evaluation of improvement of left/right tunnel (yes/no) in clinical photographs
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Change in appearance of sets of photographs (treatment and control site). A blinded evaluator will be asked to evaluate improvement (yes/no) for each side.
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Lesion count
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Number of inflamed nodules and tunnels in each region
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Change in Patients global assessment (PtGA)
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Patient's overall evaluation of disease activity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 is no disease activity (=better); 100 is maximum disease activity (=worse)
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Change in Physician's global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Physician's overall evaluation of disease activity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 is no disease activity (=better); 100 is maximum disease activity (=worse)
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Described number of flares
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Patient's description of number of flares since last appointment
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Number of treated and control tunnels acquiring rescue therapy
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
The patient's need for rescue-treatment with intralesional triamcinolone in each tunnel since last appointment
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Suppuration
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
degree of suppuration measured on a 4-point numerical ranking scale (0= no suppuration, 1=mild suppuration, 2 = moderate suppuration, 3 = severe suppuration)
At baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Microbiome by investigation of skin biopsies
Time Frame: At baseline and 6 weeks from baseline
investigation of changes in skin microbiome in skin biopsies which will lead to descriptive observations of alterations in observed bacteria, vira and fungi
At baseline and 6 weeks from baseline
Thermography
Time Frame: At baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks from baseline
Inflammation in each of the two tunnels as reflected by Thermography
At baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks from baseline
Dermatology Life Quality index (DLQI) questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
Investigation of quality of life in this group of patients by a standardised dermatological questionaire. The questions relates to a standardized score between 0 and 30, where 0 means that the quality of life is not affected (better) and 30 means that quality of life is completely affected (worse).
baseline
Patient satisfaction: VAS
Time Frame: At 12 weeks from baseline
Overall satisfaction with treatment on an overall on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 is no satisfaction with treatment (=worse); 10 is maximum satisfaction with treatment (=better)
At 12 weeks from baseline
Number of patient preferring the treatment tunnel over the control tunnel
Time Frame: At 12 weeks from baseline
Registration of which side (treated or control) the patients prefer over the other
At 12 weeks from baseline
Descriptive histological appearance of HS-tunnels
Time Frame: At baseline and 6 weeks from baseline
Descriptive histological appearance of HS-tunnels and if possible, detection of histological changes after treatment
At baseline and 6 weeks from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregor BE Jemec, DmSc, Prof., Zealand University Hospital - Roskilde

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No plan

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Clinical Trials on 1470 nm intra-lesional diode laser treatment of right HS tunnel

3
Subscribe