Clinical Study of Huperzine A in the Treatment of Patients With Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage

A Randomized, Controlled, Single-center Clinical Study of Huperzine A in the Treatment of Brain Injury in Patients With Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage

  1. To evaluate the effectiveness of Huperzine A injection in the treatment of brain injury in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage;
  2. To evaluate the safety of Huperzine A injection in the treatment of brain injury in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage。

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A randomized, controlled, single-center, exploratory clinical research method was used. In the treatment plan, the experimental group used basic treatment + Huperzine A, and the control group only used basic treatment, with a total of 20 cases. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Huperzine A injection in the treatment of brain injury in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 410103
        • The fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged from 18 to 75 years old(including 18 and 75 years old), males or females;
  2. First onset, clinical diagnosis of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, and CT confirmed that the amount of hemorrhage is between 15ml-50ml, the bleeding site is the basal ganglia, the bleeding has not penetrated into the lateral ventricle, and non-surgical patients;
  3. Those with obvious neurological dysfunction after the onset, 5≤GCS≤15 or NIHSS≥6;
  4. Admission within 72 hours after the onset of the disease, and no significant enlargement of the hematoma within 24 hours after admission (hematoma enlargement ≤ 5ml);
  5. The patient/family knows and signs the informed consent form voluntarily.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cerebral hemorrhage caused by cerebral aneurysm, brain tumor, brain trauma, cerebral parasitic disease, cerebrovascular malformation, abnormal blood vessel network at the base of the brain, cerebral arteritis, blood disease, metabolic disorder and other diseases confirmed by examination;
  2. Patients with enlarged hematoma found within 24 hours after admission (the volume of enlarged hematoma> 5ml);
  3. Patients with simple transient ischemic attack, lacunar infarction, subarachnoid hemorrhage and ischemic cerebral infarction;
  4. Patients who use anticoagulant drugs for a long time;
  5. Patients with platelet count <100,000, INR>1.4 at admission and abnormal blood coagulation function;
  6. The measured value of homocysteine at admission is higher than 15μmol/L;
  7. Patients who need surgical treatment (including ventricular drainage);
  8. Patients with severe primary diseases such as cardiovascular, liver (ALT or AST>1.5 times the upper limit of normal), kidneys (BUN>1.5 times the upper limit of normal and Cr>upper limit of normal), endocrine system and hematopoietic system;
  9. Those who are allergic to protein and test drugs;
  10. People who are dependent on drugs or alcohol;
  11. Intended pregnancy or women of childbearing age with positive pregnancy test and lactating women;
  12. Participated in other clinical trials within the past 3 months;
  13. Patients considered by the investigator to be inappropriate to participate in clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental:Huperzine A for Injection+Basic treatment
Huperzine A for Injection: Dissolve each bottle with 2ml sterile water for injection and inject into muscle, the course of treatment is 14 days; Basic treatment:Control blood pressure; prevent continued bleeding; prevent and treat gastrointestinal bleeding; decide whether to perform dehydration treatment according to the condition to reduce cerebral edema; prevent infection, prevent various complications, etc.; routine rehabilitation training.
Give the patient one intramuscular injection (0.2mg) of Huperzine A of injection once a day for 14 days
NO_INTERVENTION: Control:Basic treatment
Basic treatment:Control blood pressure; prevent continued bleeding; prevent and treat gastrointestinal bleeding; decide whether to perform dehydration treatment according to the condition to reduce cerebral edema; prevent infection, prevent various complications, etc.; routine rehabilitation training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extension of Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOSE) Scores at 90 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 90-day
At the 90-day follow-up of patients, the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) was used to assess and judge the difference in consciousness after stroke between the two groups. The scores of minimum values is 1, the maximum values is 8, whether higher scores mean a better outcome.
At the 90-day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extension of Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOSE) Scores at 30 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 30-day
At the 30-day follow-up of patients, the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) was used to assess and judge the difference in consciousness after stroke between the two groups. The scores of minimum values is 1, the maximum values is 8, whether higher scores mean a better outcome.
At the 30-day
Scores of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) at 14 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 14-day
At 14 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS). The mRS score of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 5, whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At the 14-day
Scores of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) at 30 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 30-day
At 30 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS). The mRS score of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences.The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 5, whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At the 30-day
Scores of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) at 90 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 90-day
At 90 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS). The mRS score of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences.The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 5, whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At the 90-day
Scores of National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS) at 14 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 14-day
At 14 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS). The NIHSS score of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 42, whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At the 14-day
Scores of National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS) at 30 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 30-day
At 30 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS). The NIHSS score of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 42, whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At the 30-day
Scores of National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS) at 90 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 90-day
At 90 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS). The NIHSS score of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 42, whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At the 90-day
Scores of the Barthelindex of ADL at 14 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 14-day
At 14 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of Barthelindex of ADL. The Barthelindex of ADL scores of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 100, whether higher scores mean a better outcome.
At the 14-day
Scores of the Barthelindex of ADL at 30 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 30-day
At 30 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of Barthelindex of ADL. The Barthelindex of ADL scores of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 100, whether higher scores mean a better outcome.
At the 30-day
Scores of the Barthelindex of ADL at 90 days of treatment
Time Frame: At the 90-day
At 90 days of treatment, the two groups of patients were scored with scores of Barthelindex of ADL. The Barthelindex of ADL scores of the two groups were compared whether there were statistical differences. The scores of minimum values is 0, the maximum values is 100, whether higher scores mean a better outcome.
At the 90-day
Complication rate
Time Frame: At the 90-day
After 90 days of treatment, compare whether the incidence of complications (including epilepsy, hydrocephalus, infarction, rebleeding, pneumonia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage) between the two groups is statistically different
At the 90-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

August 3, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 28, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurosensory Disorder

Clinical Trials on Huperzine A for Injection

3
Subscribe