- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04516109
Modifications of Devices for Hip Arthroscopy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular dysplasia represent the two most common causes of secondary osteoarthritis of the hip1-3 and the two main indications for Hip Preservation procedures. Most patients with these pathologies will undergo Hip Arthroscopy, either alone, or combined with bony realignment procedures. Hip arthroscopy has grown exponentially over the past 15 years and is currently being leveraged in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of hip joint problems.
In an effort to improve surgical techniques, make surgeries faster and reproducible, mitigate complications and increase patient safety, surgeons modify and improve commercially available and commonly used non-significant risk devices with the above goals in mind.
For these reasons, the Principal Investigator (PI) modified and improved two devices for hip arthroscopy. These include the modified (1) hip capsule side fixed slotted cannula for continued access to the hip joint and (2) bone graft delivery tool set for grafting subchrondral cysts arthroscopically during hip arthroscopy procedure. After utilizing these modified devices clinically, the PI has been impressed with their impact and thus aims to demonstrate that the modifications provide significant improvements in surgical flow and technique, minimize surgical time (per technical phase), minimize surgical costs, result in an absolute low incidence of surgical complications, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80304
- University of Colorado, Hip Preservation Center, Orthopedic Department
-
Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80112
- UCHealth Steadman Hawkins Clinic - Denver
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females between the ages of 18 and 60 years diagnosed with FAI, Hip Dysplasia or the combination of the two.
- Persistent hip pain accompanied by mechanical symptoms refractory to nonoperative management lasting at least 3 months.
- Reproducible clinical examination findings suggestive of impingement and/or decreased range of motion, and positive radiographic findings on radiography, computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction, and magnetic resonance imaging.
- Joint-space width > 3 mm on all views of plain radiography and 3-dimensional computed tomography.
- Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI, Hip Dysplasia, or the combination of the two by the Principal Invesitgator.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18 years.
- Prisoners.
- Pregnant women.
- Decisionally challenged.
- Does not speak or understand English.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arthrosocpic labral repair
Patients undergoing arthroscopic labral repair with the use of the modified hip capsule slotted cannula.
|
Modified hip capsule side fixed slotted cannula used during surgery to allow for continued access to the hip joint.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arthroscopic bone grafting
Patients undergoing arthroscopic bone grafting of subchrondral cyst with the use of the modified bone graft delivery tool set and modified hip capsule slotted cannula.
|
Modified hip capsule side fixed slotted cannula used during surgery to allow for continued access to the hip joint.
Modified bone graft delivery tool set for grafting subchrondral cysts arthroscopically during hip arthroscopy procedure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical time per technical phase measured in minutes
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
|
1 Day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Surgical Complications
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Total number of complications determined to be related to the hip arthroscopy procedure.
|
Up to 24 months
|
|
Surgical costs per device used
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
Cost to use each device in surgery, measured in US dollars.
|
1 Day
|
|
Patient Outcomes: Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: Post operative up to Day 9
|
Pain, as assessed via a visual analog scale.
Possible scores range from 0-100, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating the most severe pain and a worse outcome.
|
Post operative up to Day 9
|
|
Patient Outcomes: Change in Pain
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
|
Pain, as assessed via a visual analog scale.
Possible scores range from 0-100, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating the most severe pain and a worse outcome.
|
Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
|
|
Patient Outcomes: Change in International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-12) Scores
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
|
The International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-12) measures both health-related quality of life and changes after treatment in young, active patients with hip disorders.
Patients indicate their responses to the various questions by marking a 100 mm visual analog scale.
The total score is calculated by calculating the mean of the participant's responses.
Possible scores range from 0-100 with 0 indicating the worst and 100 indicating the best possible quality of life.
|
Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
|
|
Patient Outcomes: Change in Non-Arthritic Hip Scores
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
|
The Non-Arthritic Hip score is a self-administered hip score measuring function and quality of life designed for use in younger patients with higher activity demands and treatment expectations than older patients with degenerative joint disease.
Possible scores range from 0-4, with 0 indicating the worst and 4 indicating the best level of function and outcome for the patient.
|
Pre-treatment, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):1012-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203.
- Zhang C, Li L, Forster BB, Kopec JA, Ratzlaff C, Halai L, Cibere J, Esdaile JM. Femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Dec;61(12):1055-60.
- Lung R, O'Brien J, Grebenyuk J, Forster BB, De Vera M, Kopec J, Ratzlaff C, Garbuz D, Prlic H, Esdaile JM. The prevalence of radiographic femoroacetabular impingement in younger individuals undergoing total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Aug;31(8):1239-42. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1981-9. Epub 2012 May 3.
- Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA; Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS) of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):2043-55. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00741. No abstract available.
- Kelly BT, Williams RJ 3rd, Philippon MJ. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;31(6):1020-37. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310060701.
- Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Sep;35(9):1571-80. doi: 10.1177/0363546507300258. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
- Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2522-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00801. No abstract available.
- Leunig M, Werlen S, Ungersbock A, Ito K, Ganz R. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Mar;79(2):230-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b2.7288. Erratum In: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997 Jul;79(4):693.
- Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, Chen TH, Liu CL, Chen WM. Modified anterolateral approach in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):245-50. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000218. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
- Wang Y, Xu H, Ding M, Zhen Z, Lu Q, Liao B, Shangguan L. Permanently Avoiding Steam on Camera for Arthroscopy by a Simple Device. Arthrosc Tech. 2018 Dec 17;8(1):e47-e49. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2018.08.029. eCollection 2019 Jan.
- RStudio: Integrated Development for R. [computer program]. Version 1.1.456. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc.; 2016
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-2755
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hip Arthroscopy
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedHip ArthroscopyUnited States
-
Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux MérignacRecruitingHip ArthroscopyFrance
-
Mayo ClinicActive, not recruiting
-
Pivot Medical Inc.CompletedHip ArthroscopyBelgium, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedNerve Block | Hip ArthroscopyUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Hip Arthroscopy | Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)United States
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
Alexander WeberActive, not recruitingHip ArthroscopyUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonArthroscopy Association of North AmericaRecruiting
-
Washington Orthopaedics and Sports MedicineCompletedNerve Block | Hip ArthroscopyUnited States