Prone Position and Respiratory Outcomes in Non-Intubated COVID-19 PatiEnts The "PRONE" Study (PRONE)

January 12, 2022 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
The overall objective of this study is to determine whether a positional maneuver (e.g., prone positioning) decreases the need for escalation of respiratory-related care in patients with coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

As the initial outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease it causes, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread beyond Wuhan, China it has become a pandemic affecting over 178 countries. Of patients admitted to the ICU, upwards of 85% developed the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and most if not all required mechanical ventilation. The beneficial effects of prone positioning for ARDS have been well described. Coupling the reported benefits of prone positioning in COVID-19 associated ARDS patients with the known beneficial effects of early prone-positioning in the treatment of ARDS, it is not surprising that many hospital systems are advocating prone positioning for treatment of ARDS in patients with COVID-19. However, as the pandemic continues to progress in the United States and the number of new cases grows as new clusters emerge, the possibility of 'rationing' ventilators becomes more real. Therefore, therapies that prevent the need for mechanical ventilation are desperately needed. Given the distinct benefit that patients with COVID-19 have with prone positioning, the overarching hypothesis of this trial is that patients with high risk for respiratory failure may also benefit from prone positioning.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Univeristy
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • University of North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • COVID-19 positive by nasopharyngeal swab or serostatus
  • Use of supplemental oxygen OR respiratory rate ≥ 20

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI ≥ 45 kg/m2
  • Pregnancy
  • Chest tube placement
  • Hemodynamic instability with mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg
  • Thoracic or abdominal wounds
  • Chest wall deformities
  • Vertebral column deformities that would preclude prone positioning
  • Facial trauma or surgery in the last 30 days
  • Established diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
  • Prior single or double lung transplant
  • Surgery for spine, femur, or pelvis in the last 3 months
  • Thoracic or cardiac surgery in the last 30 days
  • Pacemaker placement last 7 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control - Usual Care
Usual Care
Experimental: Intervention - Prone Positioning
Prone Positioning
Prone Positioning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of an escalation in respiratory related care (yes vs no)
Time Frame: During hospitalization, up to 30 days

Participants will be assessed for the occurrence of an escalation in respiratory related care (Yes or No). Escalation in respiratory related care is clinically defined as any of the following:

  1. intubation
  2. any increase in flow of supplemental oxygen
  3. transition to high flow nasal cannula
  4. increase in fraction of inspired oxygen
  5. transfer from a lower to a higher level acuity of care (e.g. medical floor to intermediate care unit (IMC) or intensive care unit (ICU); IMC to ICU).
During hospitalization, up to 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: Over a consecutive 24-hour period after randomization
Oxygen Saturation measured in percent oxygen over a 24-hour period.
Over a consecutive 24-hour period after randomization
Respiratory Effort as assessed by Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: Over a consecutive 24-hour period after randomization
Respiratory effort will be assessed using the respiratory rate (in breaths per minute) over a 24-hour period.
Over a consecutive 24-hour period after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Naresh Punjabi, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia, Viral

Clinical Trials on Prone Positioning

Subscribe