Increasing Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation After COPD Related Hospitalizations (Study 2)

April 8, 2024 updated by: Roberto P. Benzo, Mayo Clinic

Increasing Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation After COPD Related Hospitalizations

This study is being done to test the comparative effectiveness of participating in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program at home using new technology and health coaching following dismissal from the hospital compared to the referral to a center based pulmonary rehabilitation that may include the choice of center based or telehealth.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Despite proven benefits, the proportion of people with COPD who receive Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is very small. The current model of a center-based PR program fails to address the needs of many patients with COPD. After the COVID epidemic, telehealth is an option for individuals referred to patients referred to center based rehabilitation.

The direct referral to home-based, unsupervised PR has been proposed as an alternative model to hospital-based programs and has been found to be safe and effective. The refined home-based PR program from the pilot portion of the study supported by a separate grant mechanism (R61HL142933/NCT03865329) will be tested in this second part randomized control study.

Subjects with a COPD-related hospitalization (exacerbation or pneumonia) will be randomized after hospital discharge to either home-based PR or Choice (referral to conventional center-based PR or telehealth-based PR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

296

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55425
        • Health Partners Institute
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COPD related hospitalization and eligible for PR
  • Age 40+
  • Confidence (score > 5 in a self-efficacy question (1-10 scale): how confident you feel to use this system on a daily basis)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Inability to walk (orthopedic-neurologic problems or confined to bed)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention- Home Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Participants enrolled in the intervention arm will be offered a Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program with health coaching.
Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) with health coaching using a remote system that will allow patients to complete PR at home. The program involves upper and lower extremity exercises, self-report of symptoms (fatigue, breathlessness, physical activity and overall well-being).
No Intervention: Control- Choice
This arm receives the standard of care which includes the choice of PR at a facility or through telehealth. Center based PR involves attending a medical center gym where they can do exercises and receive disease specific education. Telehealth PR is delivered virtually through the computer or telephone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months
Percentage of Patients completing PR
baseline to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Related Quality of Life as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ).
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months
The CRQ will be completed by participants several times during the study. The questionnaire measures health related quality of life and is a validated tool. This questionnaire measures both physical and emotional aspects of chronic respiratory disease. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life. (numerical, 1-7 point Likert Scale, emotional and physical summary scores will be reported )
baseline to 3 months
Self Management
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months
The Self-Management Ability Scale (30) item questionnaire that measures ability and function. A higher score indicates more ability and function in everyday life. Scores on the subscales and the total score are transformed into scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher number is best). Each question has a range from 1-5.
baseline to 3 months
Daily Physical Activity
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months
Actigraph Activity Monitor will be worn for one week to measure daily steps, and time in sedentary mode, mild to moderate and vigorous physical activity.
baseline to 3 months
Health Care Utilization
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months
Number of ER and Hospital visits/days
baseline to 3 months
Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire (FSSQ)
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months
8 item questionnaire that measures the amount of social support and availability of help from family and friends. The answers range from 1 "Much less than I would like" to 5 " As much as I would like". The scores from all 8 questions are summed (maximum 40) and then divided by 8 to get an average score. The higher the average score, the greater the perceived social support.
baseline to 3 months
Qualitative interviews
Time Frame: After intervention (3 months)
Investigate barriers and facilitators to PR adherence
After intervention (3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberto P Benzo, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-002453
  • R61HL142933-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • Study 2/R33 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD Exacerbation

Clinical Trials on Intervention- Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation

3
Subscribe