Clinical Evaluation of HPT Treated Rigid Contact Lenses Made From Hexafocon A

August 20, 2020 updated by: Contamac Ltd

Clinical Evaluation of Hydra-PEG (Polyethylene Glycol) Treatment (HPT) Treated Rigid Contact Lenses Made From Hexafocon A

This will be an up to six months, subject-masked, contralateral, parallel-group, randomised, daily wear study. All subjects will wear the Test lens in one eye and the Control lens in the other eye. Data from the first four weeks of Test and Control lens exposure will be used for the FDA 510 (k) submission.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kassel, Germany
        • Siehste
    • S-H
      • Heikendorf, S-H, Germany, 24226
        • Hartwig Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to sign the informed consent form
  • Aged ≥18 years old
  • Experienced wearer of rigid gas permeable contact lenses
  • Subject's habitual contact lenses must be made of Boston XO (hexafocon A) material
  • Subjects must have owned spectacles or contact lenses prior to enrolment for this trial
  • Spherical power between -10.00 D and +10.00 D (at vertex distance 0 mm)
  • Corneal astigmatism ≤2.00 D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eye injury or surgery within 3 months immediately prior to enrolment for this trial
  • Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting
  • Currently enrolled in an ophthalmic clinical trial
  • Evidence of systemic or ocular abnormality, infection or disease which is likely to affect successful wear of contact lenses or use of the accessory solutions, as determined by the investigator
  • Any use of medications for which contact lens wear could be contradicted, as determined by the investigator
  • Current extended-wear users (sleep-in overnight)
  • Current monovision lens wearers
  • Current wearers of multifocal contact lenses
  • Current wearers of toric contact lenses (front surface design)
  • Current wearers of astigmatic contact lenses (posterior surface design)
  • Has a reported "Strong" comfort or vision preference between each eye with their habitual RGP lenses
  • Unacceptable fit of habitual lenses
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • Best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/9 (LogMAR: +0.20; Snellen decimal: 0.63)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HPT treated
daily wear Hexafocon A rigid contact lens treated with Hydra PEG surface coating
Other Names:
  • Hydra-PEG (Polyethylene Glycol) Treatment
Experimental: untreated
daily wear Hexafocon A rigid contact lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
questionnaire addressing subjective comfort and wear time
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Subjects rated on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 was 'poor' and 10 was 'excellent'.
subjects will be followed-up for one month
limbal redness - ocular biomicroscopy
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Findings were graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
subjects will be followed-up for one month
corneal staining - ocular biomicroscopy
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Findings were graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
subjects will be followed-up for one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Hartwig, PhD, Hartwig Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CM-002-002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ametropia

Clinical Trials on HPT treatment

3
Subscribe