Testing of the Integrated Rapid Access to HIV Prevention Program for People Who Inject Drugs Program (iRaPID)

September 20, 2023 updated by: Roman Shrestha, University of Connecticut
This is a pilot study of an integrated rapid access HIV prevention program for People who inject drugs (PWID) called iRaPID. The program incorporates same-day access to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A Hybrid type 1 implementation science design,will be used to pilot test the APN-led iRaPID program while exploring information on its implementation at multiple time points through the study. The hybrid type 1 pilot trial provides an implementation heuristic to assess potential research questions, perhaps more comprehensively, accurately and certainly earlier than could be achieved in a sequential 'intervention-then-preliminary-pilot study' strategy. In this hybrid type 1 pilot trial, the RCT will be utilized to:

  • Examine feasibility and acceptability among PWID and clinical stakeholders for an adapted APN-delivered, rapid HIV prevention program for PWID (iRaPID) that integrates same-day PrEP and OAT.
  • Estimate the preliminary efficacy of PrEP and OAT uptake in a pilot randomized controlled trial of the iRaPID vs. treatment as usual strategy in PWID without HIV.

To assess future scale-up factors, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be utilized with the nominal group technique (NGT). It is a conceptual framework developed to guide the assessment of multilevel implementation contexts. The CFIR framework was selected because it provides a structured menu of constructs associated with effective implementation. It consists of 5 domains with 39 underlying constructs. As recommended by Damschroder, in this study 8 CFIR constructs based on the relevancy will be measured.

During the NGT, participants will be asked questions related to the multi-level implementation factors that will be based on the sample guide available on http://cfirguide.org but tailored for PWID. After posing each question, participants silently generate individual ideas. Then, using a round-robin elicitation process, each person contributes ideas that are recorded visually. They then engage in group discussion to clarify and evaluate the ideas. Items are then grouped by consensus with duplicate items removed. Then, each participant casts three votes on items as they deem them important. Votes are immediately tallied, ranked based on total number of votes, and the facilitator leads a final discussion to review the results. Sessions will take 60 minutes and be audio-recorded and transcribed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale Clinical and Community Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

PWID

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. HIV-negative
  3. Reporting injection drug use (past 3 months)
  4. Substantial ongoing risk for HIV acquisition
  5. OUD based on the DSM-V criteria

Stakeholders

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. APNs, patient navigators, counselors, and administrators who reflect the range of characteristics of staff members that are involved in HIV care to PWID

Exclusion Criteria:

PWID and stakeholders

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Unable to provide informed consent
  2. Unable to read and understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iRaPID
Participants randomized to the iRaPID program will receive: a) same-day access to PrEP and OAT and educational counseling by the APN; b) safety-check phone calls/SMS; c) follow-up phone call/SMS; and d) clinical visit at Day 30
Participants randomized to the iRaPID program will receive: a) same-day access to PrEP and OAT and educational counseling by the APN; b) safety-check phone calls/SMS; c) follow-up phone call/SMS; and d) clinical visit at Day 30
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
PWID participants randomized to the training as usual (TAU) will follow the existing clinical guidelines to receive PrEP, OAT, or both.
PWID participants randomized to the training as usual (TAU) will follow the existing clinical guidelines to receive PrEP, OAT, or both.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - participants screened
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of participants screened will be used as a measure of feasibility
6 months
Feasibility - participants recruited
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of participants recruited will be used as a measurement of feasibility
6 months
Feasibility - participants randomized
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of participants randomized will be used as a measurement of feasibility
6 months
Feasibility - participants retained
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of participants retained will be used as a measurement of feasibility
6 months
Feasibility - treatment adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of participants that adhere to treatment will be used as a measurement of feasibility
6 months
Acceptability
Time Frame: 6 months
Acceptability will be measured using a 10-item acceptability rating profile. Acceptability will be based on descriptive statistics from the acceptability measures (score ≥70) and analysis of qualitative data, which will be done using thematic analysis
6 months
Uptake of PrEP and OAT
Time Frame: 6 month
PrEP uptake proportion at 6-month follow-up will be estimated and compared using linear contrast statement in SAS.
6 month
Adherence to PrEP
Time Frame: 6 months
Adherence to PrEP will be measured using the visual analogue scale and dried blood spots
6 months
Persistence on PrEP
Time Frame: 6 months
Persistence on PrEP will be measured by collecting information on refilled within 30 days after exhausting PrEP from previous fill data
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E20-0596
  • 1R21DA051934-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid-use Disorder

Subscribe