- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04531670
Testing of the Integrated Rapid Access to HIV Prevention Program for People Who Inject Drugs Program (iRaPID)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A Hybrid type 1 implementation science design,will be used to pilot test the APN-led iRaPID program while exploring information on its implementation at multiple time points through the study. The hybrid type 1 pilot trial provides an implementation heuristic to assess potential research questions, perhaps more comprehensively, accurately and certainly earlier than could be achieved in a sequential 'intervention-then-preliminary-pilot study' strategy. In this hybrid type 1 pilot trial, the RCT will be utilized to:
- Examine feasibility and acceptability among PWID and clinical stakeholders for an adapted APN-delivered, rapid HIV prevention program for PWID (iRaPID) that integrates same-day PrEP and OAT.
- Estimate the preliminary efficacy of PrEP and OAT uptake in a pilot randomized controlled trial of the iRaPID vs. treatment as usual strategy in PWID without HIV.
To assess future scale-up factors, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be utilized with the nominal group technique (NGT). It is a conceptual framework developed to guide the assessment of multilevel implementation contexts. The CFIR framework was selected because it provides a structured menu of constructs associated with effective implementation. It consists of 5 domains with 39 underlying constructs. As recommended by Damschroder, in this study 8 CFIR constructs based on the relevancy will be measured.
During the NGT, participants will be asked questions related to the multi-level implementation factors that will be based on the sample guide available on http://cfirguide.org but tailored for PWID. After posing each question, participants silently generate individual ideas. Then, using a round-robin elicitation process, each person contributes ideas that are recorded visually. They then engage in group discussion to clarify and evaluate the ideas. Items are then grouped by consensus with duplicate items removed. Then, each participant casts three votes on items as they deem them important. Votes are immediately tallied, ranked based on total number of votes, and the facilitator leads a final discussion to review the results. Sessions will take 60 minutes and be audio-recorded and transcribed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
- Yale Clinical and Community Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
PWID
- Age ≥18 years
- HIV-negative
- Reporting injection drug use (past 3 months)
- Substantial ongoing risk for HIV acquisition
- OUD based on the DSM-V criteria
Stakeholders
- Age ≥18 years
- APNs, patient navigators, counselors, and administrators who reflect the range of characteristics of staff members that are involved in HIV care to PWID
Exclusion Criteria:
PWID and stakeholders
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to read and understand English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: iRaPID
Participants randomized to the iRaPID program will receive: a) same-day access to PrEP and OAT and educational counseling by the APN; b) safety-check phone calls/SMS; c) follow-up phone call/SMS; and d) clinical visit at Day 30
|
Participants randomized to the iRaPID program will receive: a) same-day access to PrEP and OAT and educational counseling by the APN; b) safety-check phone calls/SMS; c) follow-up phone call/SMS; and d) clinical visit at Day 30
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
PWID participants randomized to the training as usual (TAU) will follow the existing clinical guidelines to receive PrEP, OAT, or both.
|
PWID participants randomized to the training as usual (TAU) will follow the existing clinical guidelines to receive PrEP, OAT, or both.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility - participants screened
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The number of participants screened will be used as a measure of feasibility
|
6 months
|
|
Feasibility - participants recruited
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The number of participants recruited will be used as a measurement of feasibility
|
6 months
|
|
Feasibility - participants randomized
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The number of participants randomized will be used as a measurement of feasibility
|
6 months
|
|
Feasibility - participants retained
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The number of participants retained will be used as a measurement of feasibility
|
6 months
|
|
Feasibility - treatment adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The number of participants that adhere to treatment will be used as a measurement of feasibility
|
6 months
|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Acceptability will be measured using a 10-item acceptability rating profile.
Acceptability will be based on descriptive statistics from the acceptability measures (score ≥70) and analysis of qualitative data, which will be done using thematic analysis
|
6 months
|
|
Uptake of PrEP and OAT
Time Frame: 6 month
|
PrEP uptake proportion at 6-month follow-up will be estimated and compared using linear contrast statement in SAS.
|
6 month
|
|
Adherence to PrEP
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Adherence to PrEP will be measured using the visual analogue scale and dried blood spots
|
6 months
|
|
Persistence on PrEP
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Persistence on PrEP will be measured by collecting information on refilled within 30 days after exhausting PrEP from previous fill data
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
- Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
- Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.
- Khati A, Altice FL, Vlahov D, Eger WH, Lee J, Bohonnon T, Wickersham JA, Maviglia F, Copenhaver N, Shrestha R. Nurse Practitioner-Led Integrated Rapid Access to HIV Prevention for People Who Inject Drugs (iRaPID): Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 11;11(10):e42585. doi: 10.2196/42585.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- E20-0596
- 1R21DA051934-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Opioid-use Disorder
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity of Chicago; Rogers Behavioral Health; University of California Santa...RecruitingSubstance Use | Methamphetamine-dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid-use Disorder | Cocaine Use Disorder | Cocaine Use | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance Use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder | Heroin Use DisorderUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Georgia Institute of Technology; CUNYCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Substance Abuse, Intravenous | Substance Use Disorders | Opioid Use | Substance Abuse | Opioid-use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder, Severe | Substance WithdrawalUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedOpioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Center for Progressive Recovery, LLCNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Yale UniversityCompletedCriminal Behavior | Opioid Use Disorder, Moderate | Opioid Use Disorder, SevereUnited States
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Pfizer; National Institutes of Health...CompletedTobacco Use Disorder | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Indivior Inc.CompletedOpioid Use Disorder, Moderate | Opioid Use Disorder, SevereUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedOpioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalOhio State UniversityActive, not recruitingOpioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Columbia University; Weill Medical College... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationOpioid Use | Opioid Court Model | Medication to Treat Opioid Use DisorderUnited States