Relationship of Patient-Specific Functional Scale With Shoulder Functions: A Prospective Study

September 4, 2020 updated by: Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Relationship of Patient-Specific Functional Scale With Shoulder Functions in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program Applied to Patients With Shoulder Problems

The aim of the study is to examine the relationship between the Patient- Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and shoulder functions in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation program applied to patients with shoulder problems.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with shoulder problems

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a shoulder pathology
  • being volunteer
  • having shoulder pain at least 3 months
  • being literate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having more than one upper extremity pathology
  • having an upper extremity pathology involving the neck and trunk
  • having a neurological finding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient with a shoulder problem
Patients with shoulder problems between 18-65 years of age and being volunteered

Shoulder disability was evaluated with Patient-specific functional scale, the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire, and the upper extremity functional index.

First assessment was applied when patients came to physical therapy clinic at first.

Second assessment was repeated after 6 weeks.

Shoulder range of motion was evaluated with universal goniometer. First assessment was applied when patients came to physical therapy clinic at first.

Second assessment was repeated after 6 weeks.

Pain intensity was evaluated with Numeric Pain Rating Scale. First assessment was applied when patients came to physical therapy clinic at first.

Second assessment was repeated after 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Disability was evaluated with Patient-Specific Functional Scale.Patients nominate 3 to 5 activities that they are unable to do or having difficulty doing because of their injury or problem. These activities are rated on an 11-point scale, where 0 is unable to perform the activity and 10 is able to perform the activity at preinjury level.
6 weeks
Activity Limitation
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Activity limitation was evaluated with The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Scale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
6 weeks
Functional Disorder
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Disability was evaluated with Upper-Extremity Functional Index.Twenty prescribed upper extremity activities are rated by patients according to a 5-point scale, where 0 is extreme difficulty or unable to perform the activity, and 4 is no difficulty. Higher scores mean better outcome scores.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Pain was evaluated with Numeric Pain Rating Scale. It requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
6 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Shoulder range of motion was evaluated with universal goniometer
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hidayet Cuha, MSc, Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 5, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 25, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Trials on Shoulder disability

Subscribe