Use Test: Dermowas Body Lotion pH 4 vs. pH 5.8

September 2, 2020 updated by: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel
The objective of the study was to examine whether normalizing of the pH by acidification through topical treatment helps to strengthen the skin barrier, to induce epidermal differentiation and to reduce inflammation in healthy individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Previous studies have shown that an emollient adjusted to pH 4 has favorable effects to the skin of aged individuals. The objective of the study was to examine whether normalizing of the pH by acidification through topical treatment helps to strengthen the skin barrier, to induce epidermal differentiation and to reduce Inflammation. The effect of a cosmetic oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion adjusted to pH 4 in comparison to the same emulsion adjusted to pH 5.8 on the integrity of the skin barrier and the mechanical stability was examined in healthy volunteers from age 18 to 75 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • Universitäts-Hautklinik Kiel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female volunteers (75 % women and 25 % men)
  • Aged 18 - 75 years
  • Healthy skin
  • Informed consent was given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atopic diathesis, atopic dermatitis and other skin diseases with a disrupted skin barrier
  • Dermatitis and other skin diseases in the test site
  • Birthmarks, tattoos, scars and other abnormalities in the test site, which may influence the measurements
  • Women: pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Known contact sensitization
  • Severe systemic diseases
  • Regular use of sauna and solarium
  • Intensive UV exposure
  • Topical use of drugs in the test site four weeks before and during the study
  • Systemic administration of anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating and antibiotic drugs
  • Previous participation in other studies within the last month before the study
  • Alcohol and drug misuse
  • Missing awareness and inability to follow the instructions of the study staff
  • Other reasons which according to the study leader speak against the participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WO 5000
Body lotion pH 4 for topical application
WO 5000
Experimental: WO 5001
Body lotion pH 5.8 for topical application
WO 5001
No Intervention: No product use
Untreated control area

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of transepidermal water loss (TEWL)
Time Frame: Change from day 1 (before application) to day 30
Tewameter TM300, Courage & Khazaka, Köln
Change from day 1 (before application) to day 30
Change of skin hydration
Time Frame: Change from day 1 (before application) to day 30
Corneometer CM 825, Courage & Khazaka, Köln
Change from day 1 (before application) to day 30
Change of erythema
Time Frame: Change from Day 1 to day 30 + 2 hours (after tape-stripping), measured over 3 timepoints (Day 1, day 30 and day 30 +2 hours (after tape stripping)
Visible score adapted from Frosch and Kligman: 0 = no redness, 0.5 = very slight redness, 1 = slight patchy or diffuse redness, 2 = moderate even redness, 3 = profound redness
Change from Day 1 to day 30 + 2 hours (after tape-stripping), measured over 3 timepoints (Day 1, day 30 and day 30 +2 hours (after tape stripping)
Change of pH
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to day 31, measured over 5 time points (Day 1, day 30, day 30+3 hours, day 30+6 hours and day 31)
pH-Meter 910, Courage & Khazaka, Köln
Change from Baseline to day 31, measured over 5 time points (Day 1, day 30, day 30+3 hours, day 30+6 hours and day 31)
Tape-stripping
Time Frame: Day 31
Number of the tape-strips until a threefold increase in TEWL compared to unstripped baseline value is reached. (D-Squame® (DSQ), CuDerm Corporation, Dallas)
Day 31
Corneocyte size
Time Frame: Day 31
After staining with Nile Red by immunofluorescence microscopy and digital imaging
Day 31
Amount of the cytokine IL-1α
Time Frame: Day 31
Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Day 31
Amount of antimicrobial peptide hBD-2
Time Frame: Day 31
Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Day 31

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sören Merker, Dr., Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DK-01/2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on WO 5000

Subscribe