Hybrid Robot+FES Stroke Rehablitation

November 8, 2023 updated by: Li-Qun Zhang, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Assessment Followed by Home-based Hybrid Robot + FES Rehabilitation Post-stroke

The investigators have developed a novel robot-guided stretching under intelligent control and combine it with active movement training, which helped increase joint ROM, reduce spasticity and joint stiffness, increase muscle force output, and improve locomotion. However, for stroke survivors with sensorimotor impairment, their peripheral muscle may not sufficiently be recruited. Functional electrical stimulation (FES), has been shown its advantage to activate the peripheral muscles for people with neurological conditions. The investigators thus make a hybrid robot-FES rehabilitation system, combining the advantage of robot and FES technologies for stroke motor recovery. The investigators further would like to translate the technologies from lab to home-based training. Thus, the investigators will conduct a randomized, controlled, primarily home-based clinical trial using an ankle robot alone or combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES) to treat sensorimotor and locomotion impairments post-stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Recruiting
        • University of Maryland School of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Li-Qun Zhang, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-85;
  • Able to ambulate at least 10 meters without human assistance, with or without an assistive device
  • ≥ 6 months post stroke;
  • having a caregiver to assist in training at home.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having expressive and receptive aphasia;
  • an inability to follow multi-step commands;
  • enrolled in another lower limb rehabilitation program;
  • having severe pain in the paralyzed lower-limb;
  • >30º ankle plantar flexion contracture;
  • Having implanted electronic device such as a pacemaker, spinal cord, or deep brain stimulator because FES may potentially interfere with their functions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FES+robot
Participants in this group will have FES during ankle robot training
Patients will use the ankle robot device as the ankle training group. Also, water-based FES electrodes positioned inside a soft garment will be secured over the DF and PF muscles by wrapping the garment around the leg just below the knee joint. Stimulation intensity will be increased to maximal tolerance of each participant. Electrically induced contraction timing will be triggered by the ankle robot in synchrony with the ankle dorsi and plantar flexion movements.
Active Comparator: Robot
Participants in this group will have ankle robot training only
Patients will be seated with the paretic foot strapped to the footplate the knee at full extension. The operator will set up and measure (using the robot) ankle passive DF and PF ROM limits. The robot training will include passive stretching, robot interactive game-based training, and cool-down stretching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity
Time Frame: Baseline
The assessment is a measure of lower extremity (LE) motor and sensory impairments post-stroke.
Baseline
Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The assessment is a measure of lower extremity (LE) motor and sensory impairments post-stroke.
6 weeks
Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The assessment is a measure of lower extremity (LE) motor and sensory impairments post-stroke.
12 weeks
Dorsiflexion active range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline
Joint ankle active range of motion measured by ankle robot.
Baseline
Dorsiflexion active range of motion
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Joint ankle active range of motion measured by ankle robot.
6 weeks
Dorsiflexion active range of motion
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Joint ankle active range of motion measured by ankle robot.
12 weeks
6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: Baseline
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
Baseline
6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
6 weeks
6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
12 weeks
Medical thickness of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle
Time Frame: Baseline
B-model ultrasound will be used to scan the muscle thickness, and the image will be further proceeded to measure the muscle thickness with unit in centimetres.
Baseline
Medical thickness of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle
Time Frame: 6 week
B-model ultrasound will be used to scan the muscle thickness, and the image will be further proceeded to measure the muscle thickness with unit in centimetres.
6 week
Medical thickness of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle
Time Frame: 12 week
B-model ultrasound will be used to scan the muscle thickness, and the image will be further proceeded to measure the muscle thickness with unit in centimetres.
12 week
Muscle fiber penation angle of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle
Time Frame: Baseline
B-model ultrasound will be used to scan the muscle and the image will be further proceeded to measure the muscle fiber penation angle with unit in degree.
Baseline
Muscle fiber penation angle of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle
Time Frame: 6 week
B-model ultrasound will be used to scan the muscle and the image will be further proceeded to measure the muscle fiber penation angle with unit in degree.
6 week
Muscle fiber penation angle of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle
Time Frame: 12 week
B-model ultrasound will be used to assess the muscle thickness, muscle fiber pennation angle. Elasticity will be measured using ultrasound elastography.
12 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed up-to-go
Time Frame: Baseline
The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Baseline
Timed up-to-go
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
6 weeks
Timed up-to-go
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
12 weeks
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM)
Time Frame: baseline
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure (STREAM) provides therapists with a quantitative measurement of motor functioning and basic mobility deficits among patients who had a stroke through the performance of 30 voluntary motor tasks of the upper extremities (UE) and lower extremities (LE).
baseline
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure (STREAM) provides therapists with a quantitative measurement of motor functioning and basic mobility deficits among patients who had a stroke through the performance of 30 voluntary motor tasks of the upper extremities (UE) and lower extremities (LE).
6 weeks
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure (STREAM) provides therapists with a quantitative measurement of motor functioning and basic mobility deficits among patients who had a stroke through the performance of 30 voluntary motor tasks of the upper extremities (UE) and lower extremities (LE).
12 weeks
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test(Brief-BESTest)
Time Frame: baseline
The Brief BESTest is a clinical balance assessment tool. It is an abbreviated version of Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), designed to assess 6 different aspects contributing to postural control in standing and walking.
baseline
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test(Brief-BESTest)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Brief BESTest is a clinical balance assessment tool. It is an abbreviated version of Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), designed to assess 6 different aspects contributing to postural control in standing and walking.
6 weeks
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test(Brief-BESTest)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Brief BESTest is a clinical balance assessment tool. It is an abbreviated version of Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), designed to assess 6 different aspects contributing to postural control in standing and walking.
12 weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: baseline
The Modified Ashworth Scale is the most widely used assessment tool to measure resistance to limb movement in a clinic setting. Scores range from 0-4, with 6 choices. 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone; 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of movement (ROM); 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved; 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult; 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
baseline
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Modified Ashworth Scale is the most widely used assessment tool to measure resistance to limb movement in a clinic setting. Scores range from 0-4, with 6 choices. 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone; 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of movement (ROM); 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved; 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult; 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
6 weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Modified Ashworth Scale is the most widely used assessment tool to measure resistance to limb movement in a clinic setting. Scores range from 0-4, with 6 choices. 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone; 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of movement (ROM); 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved; 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult; 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
12 weeks
10-meter walk test (10MWT)
Time Frame: baseline
The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function.
baseline
10-meter walk test (10MWT)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function.
6 weeks
10-meter walk test (10MWT)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function.
12 weeks
Stiffness of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle.
Time Frame: Baseline
Supersonic shear wave elastography will be used to estimate the shear wave speed(m/s) of the muscles.
Baseline
Stiffness of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Supersonic shear wave elastography will be used to estimate the shear wave speed(m/s) of the muscles.
6 weeks
Stiffness of medial gastrocnemius muscle and tibial anterior muscle.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Supersonic shear wave elastography will be used to estimate the shear wave speed(m/s) of the muscles.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Ankle robot training and functional electrical stimulation(FES) group

3
Subscribe