Fusion Ultrasound for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Endometriosis Lesions (ENDOFUSION)

January 23, 2024 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Fusion Ultrasound for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Endometriosis Lesions ENDOFUSION

The aim of the study is evaluate the fusion ultrasound performance compared to MRI and coelioscopy diagnosis when a surgical intervention is performed.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The research is about diagnosis performance between fusion ultrasound and the gold standard (MRI coelioscopy ). Fusion ultrasound is a no-invasive scientific technical which allow with security to evaluate the progress of endometriosis lesions. During 39 months, 200 patients will be follow. In one arm, there is the control group with women without endometriosis. In the second arm, there is the patient with endometriosis. We will compare monitoring differences between gold standard and fusion ultrasound ( Cost assessment,exams duration, reproductibility, the link between symptoms and evolution of the lesion size).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • AP-HP, Bicêtre Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Any major patient with an indication for pelvic MRI and pelvic ultrasound outside a proven cancer indication (suspicion of endometriosis or other pathology for the control population).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients from 18 to 50 years old
  • Patient informed and who gave her non-opposition to participate in the research
  • Patient with an indication for pelvic MRI and pelvic ultrasound either for the exploration of endometriosis or pelvic pain, or for another gynaecological pathology (ovarian cyst, poly-myomatous uterus, uterine malformation) outside of a proven cancer indication.
  • Patient affiliated to a social security or entitled to a social security allowance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a proven cancerous pathology at the time of the prescription of the complementary examinations.
  • Virgin patient
  • Pregnant patient
  • Patients under protective measures
  • Contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, intracorporeal metallic foreign body)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient with endometriosis or suspicion of endometriosis
  • Information and collection of the non-objection before inclusion
  • Interrogation, clinical examination, EHP30 and SF36 form at inclusion
  • MRI, pelvic ultrasound (coupled with fusion ultrasound)
  • Laparoscopy if indicated after MRI, ultrasound and fusion ultrasound
  • Monitoring by form and fusion ultrasound at 6 months and then once a year for 3 years
Fusion ultrasound is a technique that allows a volume acquired in MRI to be coupled to an ultrasound scan with real-time image synchronisation.
Patient with other gynaecological pathology
  • Information and collection of the non-opposition before inclusion
  • Interrogation, clinical examination, EHP30 and SF36 form at inclusion
  • MRI, pelvic ultrasound (coupled with fusion ultrasound)
  • laparoscopy if indicated after MRI, ultrasound and fusion ultrasound
Fusion ultrasound is a technique that allows a volume acquired in MRI to be coupled to an ultrasound scan with real-time image synchronisation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (VPP) and negative predictive value (VPN) of fusion ultrasound compared to transvaginal ultrasound and MRI for the diagnosis of endometriosis lesions
Time Frame: 3 years and 3 months
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fusion ultrasound compared to transvaginal gynaecological ultrasound and MRI for the diagnosis of endometriosis lesions.
3 years and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the contribution of fusion ultrasound in the follow-up of patients suffering from endometriosis, in particular with an ultrasound follow-up in comparison with an initial reference MRI in the case of medical or surgical management.
Time Frame: 3 years and 3 months
Correlation between the evolution of clinical and quality of life symptoms (EHP30 form and Short Form 36) and the evolution of lesion size between initial MRI and follow-up ultrasounds at 6 months and one year
3 years and 3 months
Evaluation of the cost of imaging for 3 years between an annual fusion ultrasound surveillance in replacement of a annual MRI surveillance
Time Frame: 3 years and 3 months
Comparison of imaging costs will be carried out over 3 years between a conventional procedure with annual MRI and the procedure being evaluated
3 years and 3 months
Compare the duration of a standard ultrasound scan to an ultrasound scan with fusion
Time Frame: 3 years and 3 months
Comparison of the average examination time by a Student T-test between standard and fusion ultrasound.
3 years and 3 months
Evaluate the reproducibility of the conclusions of the fusion ultrasound between 2 operators.
Time Frame: 3 years and 3 months
Evaluation of the reproducibility by an intra-class correlation test for the conclusions of fusion ultrasound between two operators.
3 years and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Perrine CAPMAS, DR, APHP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP191069
  • 2019-A02828-49 (Other Identifier: IDRCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on Fusion ultrasound

3
Subscribe