The Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in MCI and Early AD

October 24, 2022 updated by: Cheng-Chang Yang, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Cognitive Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that is increasingly used for a growing number of research and clinical applications.Typically, this transient magnetic field is focally applied with a figure-of-eight coil that is carefully placed on the surface of the scalp over a targeted stimulation site. Patterned repetitive TMS (rTMS), such as theta burst stimulation (TBS) can produce long-lasting effects on neural activity and behavior beyond the stimulation period (Chou et al., 2015a; Fitzgerald et al., 2006). In general, high frequency (> 5 Hz) rTMS and its newer version, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), facilitate cortical excitability, whereas low frequency (about 1 Hz) rTMS and continuous theta burst stimulation contribute to opposite effects (Pascual-Leone et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2005; Wassermann and Zimmermann, 2012).Careful manipulation of the parameters comprising these patterned rTMS pulse trains can induce neuroplastic changes that resemble either long-term potentiation (LTP) or depression (Chen et al., 1997; Pascual-Leone et al., 1994). Early studies targeting the motor cortex helped elucidate which rTMS parameters promote particular responses and their neurophysiological underpinnings (Klomjai et al., 2015).

In recent years, rTMS has been closely investigated to evaluate its potential to modulate cognitive functions in Alzheimer'sdisease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). As compared to conventional excitatory rTMS protocols, iTBS leads to comparable effects with similar number of pulses but considerable shorter duration and lower intensity of stimulation (Bakker et al., 2015; Rossi, Hallett, Rossini, Pascual-Leone, & Safety, 2009). Recent literature also suggest that TBS has lower rates of reported adverse event (AE) compared to rTMS (Najib & Horvath, 2014). Therefore, iTBS is assumed to modulate cognitive function in people with cognitive impairments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Visit 1: Informed Consent, Brain MRI/Neuropsychological Battery

Visit 2-11: (up to a week after visit 1) iTBS - or Sham-Treatment (10 sessions, 80% Resting Motor Threshold, 2s stimulation 8s inter-stimulus interval per train, 20 trains per block, 3 blocks per session with a 5-min break, 1 session per day)

Visit 12: (1 day or same day after visit 11) Functional Brain MRI/Neuropsychological Battery

Visit 13: (4 weeks after visit 11) Functional Brain MRI/Neuropsychological Battery

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Shuang Ho Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • normal visual acuity
  • diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (CDR = 0.5) by neurologists

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (family) history of seizure attacks
  • in intensive care
  • history of drug/alcohol dependence
  • assistants or students of the PI
  • major systemic diseases concerning cognitive decline (e.g., cardiopulmonary failure, liver/renal failure, poor controlled DM, traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other neurodegenerative diseases)
  • claustrophobia
  • metal implants
  • taking medication lowering the threshold of seizure attacks
  • fear of using TMS
  • with specific allergens
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active iTBS
The patient is treated with iTBS stimulation according to protocol with an active coil.
active or Sham iTBS will be given to the AD/MCI patient
Other Names:
  • Magstim rapid 2
Sham Comparator: Sham iTBS
The patient is treated with Sham-iTBS stimulation according to protocol with an inactive coil.
active or Sham iTBS will be given to the AD/MCI patient
Other Names:
  • Magstim rapid 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in scores of any tests of the Neuropsychological Battery
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-iTBS, follow-up (4 weeks post-iTBS)
WAIS-IV short-form, Word Sequence Learning Test, Benton Visual Retention Test, Color Trial Tests, 3-D Dimensional Constructional Test, Visual Confrontation Naming, Semantic Verbal Fluency Test, Stroop Color-Word Test
Baseline, immediate post-iTBS, follow-up (4 weeks post-iTBS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain MRI
Time Frame: Baseline, immediate post-iTBS, follow-up (4 weeks post-iTBS)
Change in white matter and brain activities at resting state at baseline compared to after iTBS stimulation
Baseline, immediate post-iTBS, follow-up (4 weeks post-iTBS)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on intermittent theta burst stimulation

3
Subscribe