Evidence-Based Approach to Empower Asian American Women in Cervical Cancer Screening

January 24, 2024 updated by: Carolyn Fang, PhD, Fox Chase Cancer Center
This is a randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a community-based intervention on increasing cervical cancer screening rates in underserved Korean and Vietnamese American women. All women will receive an educational program and navigation assistance. Women in the intervention condition will also receive a self-sampling kit for self-collection of a cervical sample for HPV testing. The investigators will evaluate whether the inclusion of a self-sampling kit increases the proportion of Asian American women who participate in cervical cancer screening.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Compare rates of providing a self-collected sample vs. obtaining clinic-based screening among 800 Asian American women. It is hypothesized that the proportion of women in the HPV self-sampling program who provide a self-collected sample will be higher than the proportion of women in the clinic-based program who obtain clinic-based screening.

Aim 2: Examine mediators of participation. The investigators will examine both individual- and social/environmental-level factors associated with participation across both programs. It is hypothesized that higher levels of perceived self-efficacy, lower levels of embarrassment, and fewer barriers will be associated with higher rates of participation in both conditions. Further, it is hypothesized that women in the HPV self-sampling program will report greater self-efficacy, less embarrassment, and fewer barriers compared to women in the clinic-based program.

Aim 3: Assess the relative cost-effectiveness of HPV self-sampling vs. clinic-based screening. The investigators will conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective incorporating trial-based direct medical and participant-borne costs associated with HPV self-sampling vs. clinic-based screening. It is hypothesized that the self-sampling program will be less costly to implement and achieve a higher participation rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are of Asian race and self-identify as Korean or Vietnamese
  • are 30-65 years of age
  • are overdue for cervical cancer screening (e.g., no cytology-based screening within the past 3 years; no hrHPV testing either alone or in combination with cytology in the past 5 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a prior diagnosis of cervical cancer or cervical abnormality (e.g., dysplasia)
  • had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix
  • have a compromised immune system (e.g., known HIV)
  • unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Evidence-Based Intervention
Culturally appropriate educational intervention focused on cervical cancer screening, with navigation assistance provided.
A previously evaluated educational intervention delivered in community settings. Includes culturally- and linguistically-appropriate materials.
Community health educators provide navigation assistance to access clinic-based cervical cancer screening.
Experimental: HPV Self-Sampling
Previously tested evidence-based intervention (i.e. culturally appropriate educational intervention focused on cervical cancer screening, with navigation assistance provided). Participants will also receive a self-sampling kit.
A previously evaluated educational intervention delivered in community settings. Includes culturally- and linguistically-appropriate materials.
Community health educators provide navigation assistance to access clinic-based cervical cancer screening.
An HPV self-sampling kit will be provided for home-based collection of cervical samples. Samples will be sent for analysis of HPV subtypes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation in screening
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of women who obtain clinic-based screening or return a self-collected sample
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Program delivery cost
Time Frame: 6 months
The costs associated with delivering each program. This will include: (1) Participant costs (time spent participating in educational sessions and time required to complete screening; transportation costs, if incurred); (2) Screening costs (cost of clinic-based screening, or cost of the HPV self-sampling kit); (3) Program delivery costs (community health educator time for conducting the educational programs, time will be valued at wage rates including benefits; costs of educational materials [flyers, booklets] and reminder letters); (4) Navigation costs (time and labor involved in navigating women to the clinic for screening will be documented using a log of CHE time and expenses incurred).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carolyn Y Fang, PhD, Fox Chase Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data and associated documentation can be made available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. All procedures will be compliant with NIH regulations on the distribution of unique research resources.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Community-Based Education

3
Subscribe