Efficacy of Philips Sonicare Flexcare Platinum Toothbrush® Compared to Manual Brushing in Healthy Patients: a 1 Year Follow up (SONIMAN)

Professional oral hygiene has become a customary procedure in everyday dentistry. Both manual and sonic brushes are part of normal oral hygiene education practice. Compared with manual toothbrushes, ergonomic instruments, such as sonic toothbrushes, can be a more practical and less demanding mean to remove biofilm and plaque efficiently. Studies in literature investigate the efficacy of toothbrushes in plaque removal, but the investiagator's study would validate efficacy of toothbrushes post-causal therapy, towards lower plaque accumulation, and reduction in bleeding.

The objective of this study is to compare two methods (manual VS sonic) of tooth brushing in terms of impact on the gingival index and plaque index after one session of Full Mouth-Erythritol Powder Air Polishing Therapy (FM-EPAPT) in healthy patients.

The hypothesis of the present randomized controlled trial is that sonic tooth brushing accumulates less plaque (-10%) than manual tooth brushing.

To test this hypothesis, the patients, upon initial evaluation, will be divided in 2 study groups and, after a session of professional oral hygiene, will be instructed to use:

  • CONTROL: manual toothbrush
  • TEST: sonic toothbrush. Gingival index and plaque score will be evaluated at 2, 4, 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Everyone's goal to have a healthy mouth is the removal of biofilm, plaque and calculus from the dental surface everyday. Moreover routine recalls ensure a better oral health and greater protection against caries, gingivitis and periodontitis. Regular attendance to oral hygiene sessions plays an important role but has to be accompanied by the compliance with home oral care instructions. The patients should be adequately instructed to take care of their oral health.

TRIAL DESIGN: Monocetric, pragmatic, single blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of parallel design.The trial will have one-year duration.

STUDY POPULATION: Healthy subject affected by gingivitis are included in the study. Presence of gingivitis is defined as bleeding on probing (BOP) > 25%.

PRIMARY OUTCOME: Change in Plaque Index (PI): change in 10% less of the site in test group.

SECONDARY OUTCOME:

  • Change in Gingival Index (GI): change in presence or absence of bleeding after gently run on the surface of the marginal gingiva.
  • Change in Recession (REC): change in gingival reduction.
  • Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL): change in clinical attachment level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lombardia
      • Brescia, Lombardia, Italy, 25123
        • Magda Mensi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients affected by gingivitis is defined as bleeding on probing (BOP) > 25%.
  • Healthy young patients (18-40 years)
  • Patients with almost 5 teeth per quadrant
  • Patients smoking less than 10 cigarettes a day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of periodontitis (pocket depth - PPD > 4 mm)
  • Patient with BOP and/or plaque index < 25%
  • Patient with any systemic disease
  • Orthodontic or prosthesis patient
  • Patient with split
  • Impossibility to come to the recall appointments
  • Not willing to follow the agreed protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sonic toothbrush
  • All patients receive full periodontal charting, a session of professional oral hygiene and OHI (oral hygiene instruction).
  • Each patient is instructed by the hygienist in the correct use of the sonic toothbrush
Sonic Toothbrush (Philips Sonicare Flexcare Platinum Toothbrush®)
Active Comparator: Manual toothbrush
  • All patients receive full periodontal charting, a session of professional oral hygiene and OHI (oral hygiene instruction).
  • Each patient is instructed by the hygienist in the correct use of the manual toothbrush
Manual brushing (Technique Pro - GUM® Sunstar Italiana SRL)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Plaque Index (PI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 6, 12 months
Change in percentage of site with plaque. Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits. Change in 10% of the site in test group. 10% site modification in favor of the test group.
Baseline, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 6, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Gingival Index (GI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 6, 12 months
Change in percentage of site with bleeding after gently run on the surface of the marginal gingiva. Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Baseline, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 6, 12 months
Change in REC (Clinical Gingival Recession)
Time Frame: Baseline 6, 12 months
Change in mean of REC value for each patient should be calculated. Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Baseline 6, 12 months
Change in CAL (Clinical Attachment Level)
Time Frame: Baseline 6, 12 months
Change in mean of CAL value for each patient should be calculated. Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Baseline 6, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Magda Mensi, Asst Spedali Civili Di Brescia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingivitis

Clinical Trials on Sonic Toothbrush

3
Subscribe