Duloxetine and Neurofeedback Training for the Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

December 29, 2025 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Optimizing Neurofeedback to Treat Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

This phase II trial investigates how well duloxetine and neurofeedback training work in treating patients with chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy. Duloxetine is a type of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that increases the amount of certain chemicals in the brain that help relieve depression and peripheral neuropathy. Neurofeedback training is a type of therapy that uses an electroencephalograph (EEG) and a computer software program to measure brain wave activity and may help teach patients with peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage) how to change their own brain waves to lower their feelings of neuropathy and help improve their overall quality of life. Giving duloxetine and neurofeedback training may work better in treating peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy compared to duloxetine or neurofeedback training alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Determine if the combination of duloxetine (DL) and neurofeedback (NFB) is superior to DL or NFB alone in treating chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the optimal number of neurofeedback sessions needed to result in long-term relief of CIPN in a large cohort of cancer survivors and across socioeconomic groups.

II. Examine baseline brain signatures as a predictor of response to neurofeedback (NFB) and to duloxetine and determine who will require more sessions of NFB to achieve relief of symptoms.

III. Examine if the combination of DL + NFB (than those getting DL or NFB alone) or a larger number of NFB sessions results in better improvements in cancer-related symptoms, physical functioning, and quality of life (QOL).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive neurofeedback training over 1 hour each 3-5 times weekly for up to 5 weeks. Patients also receive duloxetine orally (PO) once daily (QD) for 5 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

GROUP II: Patients receive neurofeedback training session over 1 hour 3-5 times weekly for up to 5 weeks.

GROUP III: Patients receive duloxetine PO QD for 5 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 6 and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

380

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Sarah Prinsloo
          • Phone Number: 713-563-9627
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sarah Prinsloo
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77026
        • Recruiting
        • Harris Health System (LBJ)
        • Contact:
          • HILARY Y. MA
          • Phone Number: 713-792-4171
        • Principal Investigator:
          • HILARY Y. MA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have the ability to understand and read English, sign a written informed consent, and be willing to follow protocol requirements
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  • Pain score >= 4 on a 0-10 numeric pain scale and/or grade 1-4 neuropathic pain according to the National Cancer Institute's 4 point grading scale
  • Neuropathic symptoms must be related to chemotherapy (in the opinion of the treating physician)
  • Patients must have had neuropathic symptoms for a minimum of 3 months
  • No plans to change pain medication regimen during the course of the study
  • Off active chemotherapy treatment for minimum of 3 months
  • Hormonal (e.g., tamoxifen or Arimidex, etc.) and targeted (Tarceva and Avastin, etc.) therapies allowed as long as they will be continued during the course of the study
  • Willing to come to one of the participating cancer centers for the therapy sessions; or willing to participate in the therapy sessions at their homes and live within a 45 minute drive of the main campuses; or can participate in the therapy sessions from MD Anderson regional care centers
  • If participants agree to the Remote Training Option, participants should be willing to receive equipment at their homes and to return the equipment to MDA in case of malfunction or completion of the study
  • If participants agree to the Remote Training Option, participants should be willing to download necessary software to their home computer
  • If participants agree to the Remote Training Option, participants should be willing to allow research staff remote access to their computer to run the neurofeedback program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are taking any antipsychotic medications
  • Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) disease, such as clinically-evident metastases or leptomeningeal disease, dementia, or encephalopathy
  • Patients who have ever been diagnosed with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia
  • Patients with known, previously diagnosed peripheral neuropathy from causes other than chemotherapy
  • Patients who have a history of head injury or who have known seizure activity
  • Patients for whom any contraindications of DL are known
  • Patients with suicidal ideation
  • Patients who are already taking duloxetine for peripheral neuropathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (neurofeedback training, duloxetine)
Patients receive neurofeedback training over 1 hour 3-5 times weekly for up to 5 weeks. Patients also receive duloxetine PO QD for 5 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Given PO
Receive neurofeedback training
Other Names:
  • EEG biofeedback
Experimental: Group II (neurofeedback training)
Patients receive neurofeedback training over 1 hour 3-5 times weekly for up to 5 weeks.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Receive neurofeedback training
Other Names:
  • EEG biofeedback
Experimental: Group III (duloxetine)
Patients receive duloxetine PO QD for 5 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Given PO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) unpleasantness score
Time Frame: Baseline 5 up to week 10
The primary analysis will be a linear model comparing the mean difference in the change of the unpleasantness subscale of the (PQAS)Pain Quality Assessment Scale from baseline to the end of treatment (5 weeks) between the combination arm, the duloxetine (DL), and the neurofeedback (NFB) arm while adjusting for the stratification factor. Pain Quality Assessment Scale (0-10) 0-No pain-10 Most Intense Pain Imaginable.
Baseline 5 up to week 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PQAS unpleasantness score
Time Frame: Baseline 5 up to week 10
Will use analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to evaluate whether chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) differs across the three subgroups with 0, 10 or 15 additional sessions of NFB, among the participants from the NFB + DL group who report at least 1-point clinical improvement in CIPN at week 5. The analysis will adjust for the baseline outcome (at week 5), time with CIPN symptoms (minimization factor), and other covariates such as age, sex, cancer stage, time since diagnosis, and cancer type, as appropriate. Pain Quality Assessment Scale (0-10) 0-No pain-10 Most Intense Pain Imaginable.
Baseline 5 up to week 10
Baseline brain signatures as predictors of response to NFB and to DL
Time Frame: Up to week 5
Will perform ANCOVA with the change of the unpleasantness subscale from baseline to week 5 (i.e., end of the first 15 sessions of NFB) as the outcome, intervention (NFB, DL or combo), the brain signature (one at a time) and its interaction with intervention as the independent variables of interest. Pain Quality Assessment Scale (0-10) 0-No pain-10 Most Intense Pain Imaginable.
Up to week 5
Evaluation of patients who will require more sessions of NFB to achieve relief of symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post-treatment
Linear mixed model (LMM) analyses will be performed using data measured at end of treatment, months 6 and 12 only on patients who report clinical improvement at week 5.
Up to 12 months post-treatment
Change in cancer-related symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline up to 12 months post-treatment
ANCOVA and LMM analyses will be performed to evaluate the effect of the number of additional NFB sessions on cancer-related symptoms.
Baseline up to 12 months post-treatment
Change in physical functioning
Time Frame: Baseline up to 12 months post-treatment
ANCOVA and LMM analyses will be performed to evaluate the effect of the number of additional NFB sessions on physical functioning.
Baseline up to 12 months post-treatment
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline up to 12 months post-treatment
ANCOVA and LMM analyses will be performed to evaluate the effect of the number of additional NFB sessions on quality of life.
Baseline up to 12 months post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Prinsloo, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

Subscribe