- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04561713
Virtual Reality and Diagnostic of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (PADA1) (PADA1)
May 19, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
Development of a Virtual Reality Application for the Diagnosis of Childhood ADHD: an Exploratory Study
The aim of this study is to develop an application in order to identify the most relevant cognitive and behavioral parameters for the diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in conditions closer to reality
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder in school-aged children.
This disorder is characterized by a symptomatic triad associating, inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity.
Cognitive, emotional and behavioral dysfunctions have a strong impact on the school, family and social domains of the child.
The clinical diagnosis of ADHD is all the more difficult because there are currently no biological, clinical or psychological markers that accurately measure the symptoms of ADHD.
The diagnosis is made during interviews with specialist doctors allowing the collection of information from parents and the child.
Virtual reality technology is most recognized as a tool for assessment, rehabilitation of cognitive processes and functional skills.
In addition to traditional diagnostic assessment methods, a virtual reality application in an immersive room (CAVE) in three dimensions could objectively assess the child in a dynamic environment that is as close as possible to everyday situations
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33 076
- CHU de Bordeaux
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
8 years to 12 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Group of children with ADHD :
- Children aged 8 to 12 diagnosed with ADHD (according to DSM-V criteria)
- Positive ADHD diagnosis with standardized maintenance of Kiddie-Sads
- Naïve drug treatment for ADHD
- Schooled in a classic environment
- Intellectual Quotient> 80 (4 subtests of WASI, or WISC IV-R / WISC-V less than 2 years old)
- Having French as mother tongue
- Children benefiting from a social security scheme
- Signing of free, informed and written consent by the child and the holders of parental authority Group of children controls
Children aged 8 to 12 years undiagnosed ADHD (according to DSM-V criteria) :
- Not presenting with ADHD at standardized maintenance Kiddie-Sads
- Schooled in a classic environment
- Intellectual Quotient> 80 (4 subtests of WASI)
- Having French as mother tongue
- Children benefiting from a social security scheme
- Signing of free, informed and written consent by the child and the holders of parental authority
Exclusion Criteria:
- Positive diagnosis with standardized maintenance of Kiddie-Sads for the following disorders: mood disorders, psychotic disorders, autism spectrum disorders, severe anxiety disorders and severe tic disorders
- Presenting a hearing or vision diagnosis diagnosed that does not allow the task to be performed in virtual reality
- Neurological disorders
- Photosensitive Epilepsy (contraindication to immersion in virtual reality)
- Treatment with psychostimulants or other psychotropic drugs
- Unable to complete the virtual reality task during the familiarization session
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Children aged 8 to 12 diagnosed with ADHD
|
Virtual reality application in an immersive room (CAVE) in three dimensions to assess child's sustained attention in a dynamic environment that is as close as possible to everyday situations.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Control
Control group of healthy ADHD children matched in age, gender and laterality to children in ADHD group
|
Virtual reality application in an immersive room (CAVE) in three dimensions to assess child's sustained attention in a dynamic environment that is as close as possible to everyday situations.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average number of commission errors
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Average number of commission errors to the virtual reality task
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average reaction time (ms)
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
The average reaction time (ms) to the virtual reality task
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Average number of omission errors
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Average number of omission errors to the virtual reality task
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Average number of head movement
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
The average amount of head movement to the virtual reality task
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Average number of foot movement
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
The average amount of foot movement to the virtual reality task
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Percentage
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
The percentage of periods with emotions during the virtual reality task
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Percentage of period with presence of Emotion
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Percentage of period with presence of Emotion (Engagement > 50) during the task of virtual reality (range from 0 to 100).
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Mean Emotion intensity (Engagement)
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Mean Emotion intensity (Engagement) during the task of virtual reality (range from 0 to 100).
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Mean Emotion valence
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Mean Emotion valence (negative or positive emotion) during the task of virtual reality (range from -100 to 100).
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Average reaction time (ms)
Time Frame: Day 0
|
The average reaction time (ms) to the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) wich is a neuropsychological assessment test of sustained attention
|
Day 0
|
|
Average number of commission errors
Time Frame: Day 0
|
The average number of commission errors to the CPT neuropsychological task
|
Day 0
|
|
Average number of omission errors
Time Frame: Day 0
|
The average number of omission errors to the CPT neuropsychological task
|
Day 0
|
|
Total score with the Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale.
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Scale to assess the severity of the 18 symptoms of DSM related to ADHD, the higher score mean a worse outcome.
Max value : 54
|
Day 0
|
|
Inattention score with the Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Inattention score with the Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale.
With inattention (items impairs) max value = 27, the higher score mean a worse outcome
|
Day 0
|
|
Hyperactivity score with the Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Hyperactivity score with the Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale.
Hyperactivity (items pairs) max value=27, the higher score mean a worse outcome
|
Day 0
|
|
Executive Performance Inventory Score
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Executive Performance Inventory Score with Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire.
Min value=30 and max value=100 the higher score mean a worse outcome.
|
Day 0
|
|
Quality of life (VSPA-e) score
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Quality of life score with VSPA-e questionnaire.
Min value= 0 and max value=100 the higher score mean a worse outcome
|
Day 0
|
|
Quality of life (KIDSCREEN) score
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Quality of life with KIDSCREEN questionnaire.
Min value= 0 and max value=100 the higher score mean a better outcome.
|
Day 0
|
|
Acceptability score of virtual reality tool
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Acceptability score of virtual reality tool.
Min value= 6 and max value=30 the higher score mean a better outcome.
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Acceptability score of classic neuropsychological test
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Acceptability score of classic neuropsychological test.
Min value= 6 and max value=30 the higher score mean a better outcome.
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Simulator Sickness score
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Score on the "Simulator Sickness" questionnaire.
Min value= 0 and max value=63 the higher score mean a worse outcome.
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
|
Feeling of presence score
Time Frame: From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Score at the "feeling of presence" scale.
Min value= -42 and max value=+42 The higher score mean a better immersion.
|
From one day to 8 weeks after day 0
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jean-Arthur MICOULAUD-FRANCHI, University Hospital, Bordeaux
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 21, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 4, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
May 5, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 19, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 24, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 20, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 19, 2026
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018/33
- 2019-A02603-54 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.