A Retrospective Analysis of the Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Using the "MedicBK" Digital Platform in Patients With Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation (INTELLECT)

A Retrospective Analysis of the Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Using the "MedicBK" Digital Platform in Patients With Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation (the INTELLECT Trial)

The Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) based on real clinical data and its own algorithms can help to make the right choice. This trial is designed to assess the difference between retrospective electronic medical cards (EMC) therapy prescriptions and MedicBK prescriptions based on key patient characteristics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is a lot of data from registries about poor adherence to guidelines. It is connected with a problem that patients usually have a lot of comorbidities and physicians need to know сonsequently the huge number of medications and combinations. It is very difficult to decide quickly according to available data from libraries like PubMed. The Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) based on real clinical data and its own Artificial Intelligence algorithms can help to make the right choice. This trial is designed to assess the difference between retrospective electronic medical cards (EMC) therapy prescriptions and MedicBK prescriptions based on key patient characteristics.

Two groups of experts (cardiologists with clinical practice for more than 5 years) will be participating in the trial.

Using main characteristics from EMC the first group of experts will put this data into MedicBK platform and assess retrospective treatment. The next blinded group of experts will perform prescriptions using MedicBK algorithms based on current guidelines and data from available clinical trials. The main hypothesis is the use Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) better than current clinical practice. This option can help to make the right choice of medical combination based on main patient's clinical characteristics

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

191

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and essential hypertension having indications for therapy according to European guidelines

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years old
  2. Patients diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and essential hypertension having indications for therapy according to European guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Valvular cause of atrial fibrillation
  2. GFR less than 30 ml / min
  3. Active liver disease
  4. Acute coronary syndrome
  5. The presence of thyroid diseases as a cause of atrial fibrillation
  6. Secondary arterial hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group 1
retrospective data on treatment from EMC
analysis of treatment assigned by physicians within routine clinical practice
Group 2
Treatment assignment using medicBC CDSS platform in the same cohort of patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of AF/AH treatment guidelines compliance
Time Frame: 1 MONTH
Number of electronic medical records not compliant to the AF/AH clinical practice guidelines
1 MONTH

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of MedicBK programme
Time Frame: 1 MONTH
Number of prescriptions from electronic medical records appropriate or inappropriate according to the AF/hypertension clinical practice guidelines in comparison with the treatment's choice of CDSS platform
1 MONTH

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Retrospective analysis of assigned treatment

3
Subscribe