ELICIT 2.0: Pilot Study of the Effect of Maternal Protein Supplementation During Lactation on Childhood Growth

February 23, 2021 updated by: Mark D. DeBoer, MD, MSc., MCR, University of Virginia

Haydom Global Health Research Center in north central Tanzania represents an important rural setting for performing high-quality medical research in sub-Saharan Africa. The region around Haydom is agricultural (predominantly maize-based), is resource-poor and has a high degree of stunting among local infants-with 70% stunting by 18 months in the MAL-ED study and 50% in the ELICIT study (for Early Life Interventions for Childhood Growth and Development In Tanzania). While the causes of this stunting are multifactorial, a potential contributor is early-life nutritional deficiencies, including inadequate dietary protein.

One likely source of low protein delivery to infants is from low intake among area mothers during lactation, with potential effects on breast milk protein content and child weight gain. The current study is a pilot study assessing our study team's ability to successfully deliver protein-containing food products (a balanced-energy protein supplement) to lactating mother is in the area and assessing whether consumption of these food products improves childhood growth in the 1st year of life. This is a pilot study because of the potential difficulties in distributing these products on a large scale for daily consumption. As such, we aim to demonstrate an effective distribution network, a means of assessing adherence, and measuring endpoints while gathering knowledge regarding community acceptance. The current pilot project will evaluate the effectiveness of distribution and adherence on approximately 100 mother/child dyads. If effective, a future project could involve a large enough sample to be powered to detect reasonable changes in linear growth. .

So, while the current proposal is not adequately powered to prove a hypothesis, the hypothesis underlying the study design is that daily protein supplementation delivered as a balanced protein product (Plumpy'mum) to lactating mothers for 3 months during the period from 0-6 months post-natal life will result in an increase in infant length-for-age Z-score (LAZ) by end of treatment. LAZ will be compared to controls from prior studies in the area.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In severely under-resourced areas of the world, such as the Haydom area in Tanzania (TZ), poor nutrition continues contributes to worsened health-related outcomes including growth and cognitive development. Haydom Global Health Research Center at Haydom Lutheran Hospital in north central Tanzania represents an important rural setting for performing high-quality medical research in sub-Saharan Africa. Through ongoing work in the area around Haydom in the MAL-ED and ELICIT studies, we have been attempting to improve outcomes for children in an area of severe poverty, where there is considerable malnutrition and potential sequelae:

1. Growth deficits: Poor weight gain and linear growth failure in childhood are often seen as surrogates for overall health status; persistently poor growth has implications for future work potential and lower human capital. There was a high degree of stunting in the Haydom site of Tanzanian in the multi-country observational MAL-ED study, which found that the Haydom site had the highest prevalence of stunting among all the MAL-ED sites. This degree of stunting is likely multi-factorial, though one contributor is food availability, as rates of key factors such as birthweight vary significantly according to food availability. An interim analysis of data from our ongoing ELICIT study (for Early Life Interventions for Childhood

Developmental delays: Perhaps there is no more important outcome (with the exception of mortality) than the cognitive, social and emotional development of a population, with clear extensions to human capital, economic productivity and quality of life in communities. Indeed, many observational and interventional studies (including the current study) follow growth as an outcome because of its overall association with cognitive development. In MAL-ED assessments, TZ children had fewer words than seen among US children. The reasons for potential developmental delays are multifactorial, but again malnutrition may play an important role. Studies in other developing areas have demonstrated improved cognitive development following delivery of nutrition support.

Nutritional Causes of Poor Growth

While the causes of the stunting and developmental delays are multifactorial, a potential contributor is early-life nutritional deficiencies, including inadequate dietary protein. One likely source of low protein delivery to infants is from low intake among area mothers during lactation, with potential effects on breast milk protein content and child weight gain. Indeed, the first six months of life represents a critical phase of nutrition for the developing infant, in which all (or nearly all) nutrition is delivered through the mother's breast milk. However, it is not known whether protein supplementation during lactation in this setting would improve childhood growth and reduce stunting-or whether any improvements in growth would continue beyond the period of maternal supplementation.

Assessing the potential effect of mothers receiving protein supplementation-using a balanced energy protein supplement-on childhood growth and development would require an approach that incorporates an effective distribution network, a means of assessing adherence, and a thorough knowledge of community acceptance, as well as accurate measures of endpoints on a large enough sample to be powered to detect reasonable changes in linear growth. In order to assess the feasibility of this type of approach on a smaller scale (which could be later be expanded), the current pilot project will evaluate the effectiveness of distribution and adherence on approximately 100 mother/child dyads. If this experimental approach is feasible and shows promise, it is our hope to follow it with a larger study that offers more definitive evidence of efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manyara
      • Mbulu, Manyara, Tanzania
        • Haydom Lutheran Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Maternal age >/= 18 years
  • Current pregnancy or infant </= 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Maternal inability to adhere to protocol
  • Multiple gestation
  • Significant birth defect
  • Maternal allergy to peanut, milk or soy
  • Lack of breast feeding at enrollment (and lack of intention to continue breast feeding at time of enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Plumpy'Mum
Mother/child dyads will be enrolled at child age 0-3 months and mothers will immediately begin consuming a packet of Plumpy'Mum (or similar protein food product) daily. Plumpy'Mum will be provided by the study team to the mother, who will consume this however she desires (i.e., alone or with other food). Intervention will continue for 3 months. The rational is that Plumpy'Mum consumption will improve the quality of the breast milk the child is consuming, contributing to improved growth over time. Growth will be compared to historical controls from prior studies in the area.
Mothers will consume Plumpy'Mum (one packet daily) from enrollment (child age 0-3 months) for 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Family perception of Plumpy'Mum
Time Frame: at 3 months after enrollment
Families will be queried about their impression of Plumpy'Mum
at 3 months after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use
Time Frame: 3 months
Child weight for WHO Z-score after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use compared to historical controls
3 months
Child head circumference-for-age Z-score (HCZ) after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use
Time Frame: 3 months
Child head circumference for WHO Z-score after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use compared to historical controls
3 months
Child mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-score (MUAC-Z) after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use
Time Frame: 3 months
Child mid-upper arm circumference Z-score after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use compared to historical controls
3 months
Child length-for-age Z-score (LAZ) after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use
Time Frame: 3 months
Child length for WHO Z-score after 3 months of Plumpy'Mum use compared to historical controls
3 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of adverse events in intervention arm, compared to historical controls
3 months
Maternal weight at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Maternal weight at 3 months compared to historical controls
3 months
Maternal mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-score (MUAC) at 3 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Maternal mid-upper arm circumference at 3 months compared to historical controls
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark D DeBoer, MD, MSc, MCR, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

We will assess platforms for sharing individual participant data following final data analysis.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 1 year after publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact PI to request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

3
Subscribe