Rapid Turnaround, Home-based Saliva Testing for COVID-19

December 18, 2023 updated by: Stanford University

The aim of the study is to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of a saliva based home surveillance monitoring test for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Participants will be asked to carry out as many tests as are included in the bag they are provided, on a daily basis until they are used up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1277

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pleasanton, California, United States, 94566
        • SHC Valley Care
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized patients

    • Hospitalized at Stanford Health Care for COVID-related complications and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with a PCR-based test
    • Able to understand and consent to study and with a clinical trajectory likely to be consistent with multi-day participation
  • High-risk/positive population

    • Seeking testing for suspected COVID or a participant in a study of COVID-positive outpatients
    • Own an internet-enabled phone or device capable of loading web pages, receiving text messages, and taking/uploading photos.
    • Willing to participate in the study for 6 months
  • Low-risk population

    • Own an internet-enabled phone or device capable of loading web pages, receiving text messages, and taking/uploading photos.
    • Willing to participate in the study for 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All participants:

    • Participants with salivary gland dysfunction (including patients with Sjogren's disease or those with xerostomia associated with lupus or rheumatoid arthritis)
    • Participants will not be eligible if they identify any reason they are unable to participate in the study
  • High-risk/positive population

    • Participants who have color blindness
    • Participants unable to operate the SnapDx device
  • Low-risk population

    • Participants with prior confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
    • Participants who have color blindness
    • Participants unable to operate the SnapDx device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Saliva test
Participants perform each test assay, noting the results for comparison by technician, and completing survey questionnaires.
Kit including tube with closed reagents using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Other Names:
  • SnapDx

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Feasibility Outcome. Discrepancy in interpretation of colormetric readout by participant versus by technician via photo. Passed test = void of manufacturing or user error.
Up to 5 days per participant
Number of Positive Home Saliva Tests as Determined by the Patient
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Validity Outcome.
Up to 5 days per participant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Validity Outcome (ease of interpretation). Number of participants responding by category when asked to provide a rating on being "Confident in Interpreting Results."
Up to 5 days per participant
Participant-rated Ease of Use
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Validity Outcome (ease of use). Number of participants responding by category when asked to provide a rating on SnapDx being "Easy to Learn to Use."
Up to 5 days per participant
Number of Participants That Called Technical Support
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Feasibility Outcome (ease of use). Number of participants that called technical support, by reason (e.g., processing was not possible due to broken part).
Up to 5 days per participant
Sample Integrity
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Feasibility Outcome. The participants were asked to determine whether the saliva sample filled up to the indicated line, and if there were bubbles present as a measure of sample integrity.
Up to 5 days per participant
Sensitivity of Sample Test Kit
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Validity Outcome. Analysis of saliva samples provided by participants and run through sample test kit by study lab. Sensitivity = number of true positives out of the positive tests run. Samples may have been split and run through more than one test.
Up to 5 days per participant
Specificity of Sample Test Kit
Time Frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Validity Outcome. Analysis of saliva samples provided by participants and run through sample test kit by study lab. Specificity = number of true negatives out of negative tests run. Samples may have been split and run through more than one test.
Up to 5 days per participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manisha Desai, PhD, Stanford University
  • Principal Investigator: Manu Prakash, PhD, Stanford University
  • Principal Investigator: Euan A Ashley, MRCP, DPhil, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Saliva test kit

3
Subscribe