The Influence of Expectations on Post-needling Soreness and Pain Processing After Dry Needling Treatment

April 10, 2022 updated by: Eleuterio Atanasio Sánchez Romero, Universidad Europea de Madrid

The Influence of Expectations on Post-needling Soreness and Pain Processing After Dry Needling Treatment: an Experimental Study

The general objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness on local mechanical hypoalgesia, pain intensity, disability and psychological variables of the deep dry needling technique on a latent trigger point of the upper trapezius muscle.

The specific objective of the study is to observe the interaction between patient expectations and hypoalgesic effects in patients who will receive the same technique but with different explanations about it before punction and which could influence on the modulation of post-punction pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study design:

A randomized, longitudinal, experimental, prospective, parallel and double-blind clinical trial was conducted, where both the study subject and the researcher performing the measurements do not know which treatment group they belong to.

Participants The sample was composed of 42 healthy patients residing in the Community of Madrid, all of whom were recruited personally for the study. All of them will have 15 incisions by dry needling in latent trigger point of the upper trapezium localized by palpation. All patients will read the information sheet explaining what the study will consist, as well as the informed consent form, which they will sign voluntarily beforehand. Patients were randomly assigned using GraphPad Software's QuickCals application (La Joya, CA, USA) to one of the 3 study groups.

Each group will be given a different sentence: one group will be attempted to influence with positive expectation, another with neutral expectation, and yet another will be attempted to influence with negative expectation.

Measurement instruments

Measurement of the range of movement by means of an inclinometer. To measure the range of movement the patient will be seated in a chair; feet supported on the floor, triple flexion of lower limbs of 90º (hip, knee and foot), back well supported and straight, head straight and look at the horizon. The inclinometer will be positioned to measure flexion, extension, right and left tilt and right and left rotation. The inclinometer for CROM (cervical range of motion) is approved and validated in different studies.

Measurement of pain threshold to pressure

A digital algometer was used to measure mechanical hyperalgesia. The model used was the X® brand, consisting of a 1 cm2 cylindrical rubber attached to a pressure gauge. It is calibrated in kilograms (kg) and pounds. The scale expressed in kg/cm2 was used. All patients were familiarized with this test through a trial session. They were instructed to say STOP when the pressure sensation changed to painful. Three perpendicular measurements were made on an active or latent myofascial trigger point situated in upper trapezium muscle, the mean was calculated and the data were recorded for analysis. A rest period of 30 seconds was established between the measurements. A dermographic pencil was used to mark these points prior to measurement. The intra-assay reliability is high in the upper trapezius muscle (ICC = 0.94-0.97). The minimum detectable change (CMD) for considering the results as clinically relevant in the upper trapezius fibres has been shown to be between 0.45 kgf and 1.13 kgf.

Procedural protocol

Prior to the technique, the patient will be explained that the study seeks to observe if pain appears after the dry needling procedure. During the explanation, the desired expectation will be introduced:

  • Group with positive expectation: "it is a very effective technique that achieves excellent results in the improvement of the cervical musculature"
  • Group with neutral expectations: "It's a physical therapy technique used to treat neck pain and we're investigating its effects"
  • Group with negative expectation: "this is a technique that will cause discomfort in the area of intervention of the cervical muscles after applying it ".

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28670
        • Eleuterio A Sánchez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 62 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 18 and X years of age.
  • Presence of at least one latent myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle.
  • Patients who speak and understand Spanish correctly.
  • Subjects without previous experience in dry puncture treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If patients had neurological signs and symptoms.
  • Subjects with a history of trauma, fracture or previous spinal surgery.
  • Subjects with a history of musculoskeletal and/or rheumatological diseases.
  • Unsurpassed fear of needles
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Infiltration of corticosteroids or local anesthetics for one year prior to the study.
  • Taking analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication the week before the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo Effect

Group with positive expectation: "it is a very effective technique that achieves excellent results in the improvement of the cervical musculature"

Before the treatment, it will be explained to the patient that the study seeks to observe if pain appears after the dry needling. During the explanation, the desired expectation will be introduced.

Deep dry needling procedure

All subjects received a deep dry neddling technique on a latent myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius muscle by isolating it by a pincer grasp with the thumb and index finger. This myofascial trigger point was previously found following the diagnostic criteria described by Travell & Simons and Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., and the deep dry needling intervention applied was based on the technique described by Hong.

The patients were placed in a prone position. Prior to the technique, the area was disinfected with an antiseptic solution. Fifteen incisions were made with a 0.26x40mm monofilament needle. The number of local twitch response made were noted. After removing the needle, at the end a soft compression was made with a cotton to reduce the possible appearance of bleeding.

Experimental: Nocebo Effect

Group with negative expectation: "this is a technique that will cause discomfort in the area of intervention of the cervical muscles after applying it ".

Before the treatment, it will be explained to the patient that the study seeks to observe if pain appears after the dry needling. During the explanation, the desired expectation will be introduced.

Deep dry needling procedure

All subjects received a deep dry neddling technique on a latent myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius muscle by isolating it by a pincer grasp with the thumb and index finger. This myofascial trigger point was previously found following the diagnostic criteria described by Travell & Simons and Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., and the deep dry needling intervention applied was based on the technique described by Hong.

The patients were placed in a prone position. Prior to the technique, the area was disinfected with an antiseptic solution. Fifteen incisions were made with a 0.26x40mm monofilament needle. The number of local twitch response made were noted. After removing the needle, at the end a soft compression was made with a cotton to reduce the possible appearance of bleeding.

Experimental: Neutral Effect

Group with neutral expectations: "It's a physical therapy technique used to treat neck pain and we're investigating its effects"

Before the treatment, it will be explained to the patient that the study seeks to observe if pain appears after the dry needling. During the explanation, the desired expectation will be introduced.

Deep dry needling procedure

All subjects received a deep dry neddling technique on a latent myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius muscle by isolating it by a pincer grasp with the thumb and index finger. This myofascial trigger point was previously found following the diagnostic criteria described by Travell & Simons and Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al., and the deep dry needling intervention applied was based on the technique described by Hong.

The patients were placed in a prone position. Prior to the technique, the area was disinfected with an antiseptic solution. Fifteen incisions were made with a 0.26x40mm monofilament needle. The number of local twitch response made were noted. After removing the needle, at the end a soft compression was made with a cotton to reduce the possible appearance of bleeding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
To evaluate the pain that the patient has, we use the VAS (Appendix 1). This is a 100 mm line that measures pain intensity. The left end of the line represents the absence of pain, while the right end represents the worst pain imaginable. The numerical pain intensity scale adds a numerical graduation where 1 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. The confidence and reliability of this scale has been approved and validated in different studies. This scale will be used accompanying each CROM measurement as well as in pre-treatment measurements.
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
It will be used to measure the level of disability perceived by the patient as a result of their neck pain, after performing the technique and to check whether it appears during the control measurements. It is a questionnaire composed of 10 sections on different activities of daily living (ADLs); self-care, reading, lifting weights, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, work, concentration, pain intensity and headache. Each section scores from 0 to 5, with zero being no pain and five being the worst pain imaginable. (Maximum 50 points). Therefore, in order of appearance, of the 6 options, the first option of each item represents 0 and the last one 5. The higher the score obtained, the greater the patient's disability.
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
STAI (State-Trait Anxiety)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
Questionnaire composed of 20 items with 4 points each that evaluate "state anxiety" (transitory emotional condition influenced by environmental factors that decrease or increase anxiety) and another 20 that evaluate "trait anxiety" (personality factor that predisposes to suffer or not suffer anxiety). The 2-part score ranks patients at a percentile to the general population. The higher the score, the greater the anxiety. It is one of the most widely used tools in research to measure levels of general anxiety.
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
Beck II (Depression)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
A 21-item scale used to assess the severity of depression. The patient has to select for each item the response alternative that best reflects his/her state during the last week. The total score is obtained by adding up the values of the selected items, which range from 0 to 3. The commonly accepted cut-off points for grading intensity/severity are as follows: 0 to 9, no depression; 10 to 18, mild depression; 19 to 29, moderate depression, and ≥ 30 points, severe depression.
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
PCS (Pain Catastrophizing Scale)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
It consists of 14 items valued on a 5-point scale. It evaluates the degree to which they have thoughts and feelings when they experience pain.
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
TSK (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
17 items, 4 points each where higher scores indicate higher levels of fear of movement.
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
PASS-20 (Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
It has four 5-item subscales that measure avoidance, fearful thoughts, cognitive and physiological anxiety, and pain responses. Participants rate each item on a 6-point scale ranging from never (0) to always (5).
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
FPQ-III (Fear of Pain Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling
It consists of 30 items, each with 5 points that measure fear over specific situations that normally produce pain
Change from base line, immediately after the intervention with dry needling; and 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 1 of week follow-up after the intervention with dry needling

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Josué Fernández Carnero, PhD, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • Principal Investigator: Eleuterio A Sánchez Romero, PhD, Universidad Europea de Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Expectative Influence

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disability

Clinical Trials on Dry Needling

3
Subscribe