Pneumatic Technology for Powered Mobility Devices (PTPMD)

December 26, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Clinical Evaluation of Pneumatic Technology for Powered Mobility Devices

Over 240,000 Veterans with disabilities use mobility devices such as manual and power wheelchairs and scooters, and this number continues to grow. Mobility devices have been described as the most enabling technology a clinician can provide to a person with a disability. Yet, the batteries used to power scooters and wheelchairs have many drawbacks. Batteries are hazardous to humans and the environment, heavy (which limits transportability), and incompatible with wet or highly humid environments. Repairs to electrical systems and replacement of batteries are frequently needed. These are costly and adversely affect the Veteran. Compressed air is a power source that overcomes many of these disadvantages. The investigators have developed a scooter and a wheelchair that are powered solely by compressed air. The purpose of this study is to clinically evaluate the impact of these new devices on Veterans living in long-term care facilities, and to obtain feedback from nurses, therapists, and engineers regarding their design and feasibility of use in long-term care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over 240,000 Veterans with disabilities use mobility devices such as manual and power wheelchairs and scooters, and this number continues to grow. Mobility devices have been described as the most enabling technology a clinician can provide to a person with a disability. Appropriate mobility devices improve function, independence, home and community integration; activity and participation; comfort; and quality of life. Yet, battery-powered mobility devices (BPMDs) have many drawbacks. Despite advances in technology, batteries are still hazardous to humans and the environment, heavy (which limits transportability), and incompatible with wet or highly humid environments. Repairs to electrical systems and replacement of batteries are frequently needed. These are costly and result in being stranded, missing medical appointments, missing work or school, injury, increased pain, lower self-perceived health, skin breakdown, higher hospitalization rates, and reduced community participation. Surveys conducted by the VA Center on Wheelchairs and Associated Rehabilitation Engineering (WARE) identified alternative power sources as a top research priority of Veterans and providers.

Compressed air is a power source that has many advantages over batteries, including safety to both humans and the environment, lighter weight, waterproof nature, and lack of any electrical components which can reduce the frequency of repairs. Two novel pneumatically-powered mobility devices (PPMDs), a scooter and wheelchair, were developed and tested for feasibility with 107 users. The devices were lighter and had sufficient driving range per charge for the average user. There were no safety or repair issues encountered in the 11-week field test. Filling air tanks was also much faster than charging a typical battery. With pilot funds, the investigators then built two new scooters and two new power wheelchairs with longer driving ranges. The investigators also developed a portable backup tank system that allows us to refill or replace the tanks easily in the community.

The purpose of this study is to clinically evaluate the impact of PPMDs on Veterans living in long-term care facilities, and to obtain feedback from key stakeholders regarding the design and feasibility of use of PPMDs in long-term care. Long-term care was chosen because it is an ideal setting for technology that is water-proof (e.g., compatible with inclement weather, ease of cleaning, and resistant to incontinence and requires less maintenance and upkeep. In Phase 1 (Technical), the investigators will build 8 pneumatically-powered scooters, 8 pneumatically-powered wheelchairs, 2 air filling stations with flow switches that measure air filling time, 20 dataloggers that will measure battery charging time, and 20 dataloggers that will monitor activity levels. Phase 2 (clinical evaluation) will comprise two aims. First, the investigators will enroll 50 Veterans into a cross-over trial in which they use a BPMD provided to them that is the same make and model as their own BPMD, and its PPMD counterpart in random order, each for 6 months. The investigators will compare pneumatically-powered and battery-powered scooters and wheelchairs with respect to functional mobility, satisfaction, psychosocial impact, "charging time," maintenance and repairs. The investigators hypothesize that Veterans will have higher levels of mobility, satisfaction, and psychosocial impact when using PPMDs compared to when using BPMDs. The investigators also hypothesize that PPMDs will be faster to "charge" and have fewer maintenance and repair issues than BPMDs. Second, the investigators will conduct qualitative interviews of the 50 participants in the clinical evaluation and an additional 54 key stakeholders involved in PPMD and BPMD use (e.g., family members/caregivers, clinicians, and technical support personnel). The investigators will assess patient, facility, VA healthcare system, and other factors that may be barriers or facilitators to use of PPMDs and identify modifiable factors that may further improve the design.

Results of the proposed study will pave the way for potential adoption of this technology within the VA. Such adoption could have a direct and positive impact on Veterans' lives. This research has the potential for national impact on the wheelchair provision process and services within the VA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • Recruiting
        • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brad E. Dicianno, MD MS
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Aim 2A

  • Participant must be 18 years or older
  • Participant must use or be in the process of obtaining a scooter or Group 2 power wheelchair without power seat functions
  • Participant must be able to speak and understand English in order to provide informed consent

Aim 2B Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants must be 18 years or older
  • Participants must be either a participant in Aim 2A, a family member/caregiver of a participant, or an employee of a participating long-term care facility
  • Participants who are employees must have some experience with charging, storing, transporting, cleaning, or maintaining BPMDs, e.g.:

    • nurse
    • physical therapist
    • occupational therapist
    • engineer, etc.
  • Participants who are employees must be willing to assist at least three Aim 1 participants in the charging, storing, transporting, cleaning, or maintaining of their PPMDs for at least 3 months
  • Participants must be able to speak and understand English in order to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria for Aim 2A

  • Open pressure injuries of skin on sitting surface that could worsen with prolonged sitting

Exclusion Criteria for Aim 2B

  • There are no exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: pneumatically powered wheelchair or scooter
participants will use pneumatic powered wheelchair or scooter
a wheelchair or scooter powered by compressed air will be used for 6 months. Compressed air is a novel power source and no batteries are used in these devices.
Active Comparator: battery powered wheelchair or scooter
participants will use battery powered wheelchair or scooter
a wheelchair or scooter powered by a battery will be used for 6 months. These are conventional mobility devices that the participants are using or in the process of obtaining

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Mobility Assessment
Time Frame: Month 1, 3 and 6 within the first 6 months and repeated in the second 6 months."
Functional measure of mobility; change of 10 points is considered clinically significant. The FMA contains 10 items that measure the extent to which a mobility device aids a user in completing functional tasks like reaching, personal care tasks, indoor mobility, outdoor mobility and transferring. Ten items are scored individually on a 7- point Likert scale (6 = completely agree, 5 = mostly agree, 4 = slightly agree, 3 = slightly disagree, 2 = mostly disagree, 1 = completely disagree and 0 = does not apply to me). A total mobility score is then calculated from summing the individual item scores and an adjusted total score is expressed as a percentage of total score divided by sum of relevant items. The FMA is the most widely used measure to assess function in mobility device users. The change in FMA will be assessed 3 times over a 6 month period in each arm of the trial. Assessments will occur in month 1, 3 and 6 within the first 6 months and repeated in the second 6 months.
Month 1, 3 and 6 within the first 6 months and repeated in the second 6 months."

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brad E. Dicianno, MD MS, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A2753-R

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disability

Clinical Trials on pneumatically powered wheelchair or scooter

3
Subscribe