Ustekinumab for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease After Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

December 30, 2025 updated by: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial Examining Ustekinumab for Prevention of Graft Vs. Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

This phase II trial studies how well ustekinumab works in preventing acute graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can attack the body's normal tissues (called graft-versus-host disease). Giving ustekinumab after the transplant may help prevent acute graft-versus-host disease by controlling the body's immune response. Funding Source- FDA OOPD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Between 4 and 72 hours prior to start of HCT conditioning therapy, patients receive ustekinumab intravenously (IV). Beginning 8 weeks after receiving IV ustekinumab, patients receive ustekinumab subcutaneously (SC) on days 50 (+/- 5 days), 100 (+/- 7 days), and 160 (+/- 7 days) post-HCT in the absence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, disease relapse or unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: HCT infusion takes place on day 0.

ARM II: Between 4 and 72 hours prior to start of HCT conditioning therapy, patients receive a placebo IV. Beginning 8 weeks after IV placebo, patients receive a placebo SC on days 50 (+/- 5 days), 100 (+/- 7 days), and 160 (+/- 7 days) post-HCT in the absence grade III-IV acute GVHD, of disease relapse, or unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: HCT infusion takes place on day 0.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-HCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center,
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 - 70
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Hematologic malignancy or disorder requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
  • Adequate vital organ function:

    1. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%
    2. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥ 50% of predicted values on pulmonary function tests
    3. Transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], aspartate aminotransferase [ALT]) < 3 times upper limit of normal values
    4. Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 cc/min.
  • Performance status: Karnofsky Performance Status Score ≥ 70%.
  • HCT donor is at least 8/8 (matched at HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1) matched with the recipient
  • PBSC (peripheral blood mobilized stem cells) as graft source
  • Fully myeloablative, reduced-toxicity ablative, or reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. If melphalan is part of the conditioning regimen, dose must be at least 75mg/m^2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection not controlled with appropriate antimicrobial therapy
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection
  • Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of the conditioning regimen or GVHD prophylaxis
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Subjects of childbearing age unwilling to use an effective birth control method or refrain from sexual intercourse until 15 weeks after last dose of study drug
  • Non-myeloablative conditioning regimens or conditioning regimens that use less than 75mg/m^2 of melphalan
  • Prior allogeneic transplant
  • Non-malignant blood disorders (e.g. sickle cell disease, aplastic anemia)
  • Positive screening test for tuberculosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (ustekinumab)
Between 4 and 72 hours prior to start of HCT conditioning therapy, patients receive ustekinumab IV. Beginning 8 weeks after receiving IV ustekinumab, patients receive ustekinumab SC on days 50 (+/- 5 days), 100 (+/- 7 days), and 160 (+/- 7 days) post-HCT in the absence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, disease relapse or unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: HCT infusion takes place on day 0.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Given IV and SC
Other Names:
  • CNTO1275
  • Stelara
  • CNTO 1275
  • Immunoglobulin G1, Anti-(Human Interleukin-12 Subunit beta (IL-12B, CLMF p40, NKSF2)) (Human Monoclonal CNTO 1275 gamma1-chain), Disulfide with Human Monoclonal CNTO 1275 kappa-chain, Dimer
Placebo Comparator: Arm II (placebo)
Between 4 and 72 hours prior to start of HCT conditioning therapy, patients receive a placebo IV. Beginning 8 weeks after IV placebo, patients receive a placebo SC on days 50 (+/- 5 days), 100 (+/- 7 days), and 160 (+/- 7 days) post-HCT in the absence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, disease relapse, or unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: HCT infusion takes place on day 0.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Given IV and SC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) survival
Time Frame: At 6 months post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)
Will be treated as a binary outcome, and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test will be used to compare the two groups based on the stratification factors.
At 6 months post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD
Time Frame: At 100 days post-HCT
At 100 days post-HCT
Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD
Time Frame: At 6 months post-HCT
At 6 months post-HCT
Acute GVHD organ staging, overall grading, and classification
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to day 100 post-HCT
Minnesota risk criteria will be used to assess organ involvement, individual organ staging, and overall acute GVHD grade. Risk classification will be performed per MacMillan et al.
From time of HCT, assessed up to day 100 post-HCT
Incidence of overall chronic GVHD
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Will be assessed at serial study visits, and scored according to National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria.
From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Will be assessed at serial study visits, and scored according to National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria.
From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Incidence of post-HCT relapse
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Relapse is defined as hematologic relapse or any unplanned intervention (including withdrawal of immune suppression) to prevent progression of disease in patients with evidence (molecular, cytogenetic, flow cytometric, radiographic) of malignant disease. Will be compared using either the log-rank test (if no competing risks) or Gray's test (if competing risks are present). For time-to-event endpoints with competing risks, the log-rank test will also be used for exploratory purposes.
From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Incidence of non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Non-relapse mortality indicates death with primary malignancy that served as HCT indication in remission. Will be compared using either the log-rank test (if no competing risks) or Gray's test (if competing risks are present). For time-to-event endpoints with competing risks, the log-rank test will also be used for exploratory purposes.
From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Relapse-free survival
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Relapse is defined as hematologic relapse or any unplanned intervention (including withdrawal of immune suppression) to prevent progression of disease in patients with evidence (molecular, cytogenetic, flow cytometric, radiographic) of malignant disease. Will be compared using either the log-rank test (if no competing risks) or Gray's test (if competing risks are present). For time-to-event endpoints with competing risks, the log-rank test will also be used for exploratory purposes.
From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Overall survival
Time Frame: From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT
Will be compared using either the log-rank test (if no competing risks) or Gray's test (if competing risks are present). For time-to-event endpoints with competing risks, the log-rank test will also be used for exploratory purposes.
From time of HCT, assessed up to 2 years post-HCT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie J. Lee, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

Subscribe