The Smartphone and Wearable Detected Atrial Arrhythmia in Older Adults Case Finding Study (Smart in OAC - AFNET 9) (Smart in OAC)

July 4, 2022 updated by: Atrial Fibrillation Network

Multicentre, Intern., Inv.-Initiated, Single-arm Case-finding Study of a Cloud Based Analytic Service as Screening Tool to Detect and Quantify Episodes of Absolute Arrhythmia Using an Automated, Wearable PPG-based Monitoring System

This feasibility study will develop and evaluate pathways to identify participants with wearable-detected absoulute Arrhythmia (AA) and to enable local study teams to contact them regarding participation in a controlled trial of oral anticoagulation in this population, which will be conducted after the feasibility study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, the feasibility of evaluating the efficacy of a cloud based analytic service in combination with a PPG-wearable in detecting AA will be assessed and the number of cases found. The design aims to provide simple, low-threshold access to this screening technology targeting at-risk populations. This study will not cause any restrictions on the usual care of the study participants. Access to the screening will be provided close to home and free of charge. The app will also be used to validate and enhance the clinical information about the participants captured during the study. This information will be used to define and refine target groups with highest screening efficiency and, in the long-term, outcome benefits. The study will describe the prevalence of AA in an unselected population that can be reached by a low-threshold screening procedure. The study will also generate important information on the different possible screening environments in different countries (e.g. pharmacies, GP practices, etc). Structures of work-up and continuous patient management in screen-positive individuals will be described and may help to design screening pathways in the main trial. By verifying the wearable-diagnoses by ECG in all screen-positive and a random selection of screen-negative participants, the diagnostic accuracy of the wearable in combination of cloud based analytic service can be estimated. Cost effectiveness assessment will evaluate the cost of low-threshold remote screening per patient identified and help guide to target high risk groups with optimal screening yield in the future. The collected data will provide the sound basis for the design and conduct of a large outcome trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

882

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum UKE Hamburg
      • Markkleeberg, Germany, 04416
        • Kardiologische Praxis, Dr. med. Jens Taggeselle
      • Kraków, Poland, 31-514
        • Krakowskie Centrum Diagnostyczno-Kliniczne (KCDK)
    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clínic Unitat d'Arrítmies, Institut Cardiovascular

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

61 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • 65 years or older
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Owning mobile phone compatible with the PPG-wearable

Exclusion criteria:

  • Known AF
  • Known current or planned oral anticoagulation treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: only control group
To investigate the specificity of the wearable and to gather more information on ECG abnormalities in the population studied, a randomly selected group of participants without wearable-detected AA within 8 weeks of screening (same number as screen-positives and verified by Telecare) will also be invited to obtain a 14day Tele ECG (patch).
CE certified devices

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants with newly detected AA within 4 weeks of device use of all participants included in the study
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks
Proportion of participants with newly detected AA within 4 weeks of device use of all participants included in the study
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Propotion of participants with AA detected at any time, including those with AA detected within the full time of recording
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Propotion of participants with AA detected at any time, including those with AA detected within the full time of recording
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Time from completed enrolment to the first positive screening, taking death as compeeting risk into account
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Time from completed enrolment to the first positive screening, taking death as compeeting risk into account
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Regional differences of AA prevalance (diagnostic yield)
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Regional differences of AA prevalance (diagnostic yield)
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Differences by rout fo invitation and enrolment
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Differences by rout fo invitation and enrolment
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Duration of atrial arrhythmia episodes
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Duration of atrial arrhythmia episodes will be reported descriptively by mean, sd, range, median and IQR
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Follow-up EQ-5DL-5L viscual analogue scale of participants with positve PPG
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Follow-up EQ-5DL-5L viscual analogue scale of participants with positve PPG
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Detection of AF: Number of participants with clinically confirmed arrhythmias during Holter ECG
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Detection of AF: Number of participants with clinically confirmed arrhythmias during Holter ECG, documented clinically or by event-recorder
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Compliance: The compliance of participants with protocol with regards to the measurement procedure of the app and wearable
Time Frame: Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months
Compliance: The compliance of participants with protocol with regards to the measurement procedure of the app and wearable will be presented descriptively
Screening per participant: 4-8 weeks ECG screening: 2 weeks Overall study duration: 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Larissa Fabritz, Professor, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Smart in OAC - AFNET 9

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Arrhythmia

Clinical Trials on Preventicus heartbeat app in combination with wearables

Subscribe