Emergency Echocardiography in Sepsis (GENESIS)

December 4, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Limoges

Impact of Early Haemodynamic Assessment by Echocardiography on Organ Dysfunction of Patients Admitted in the Emergency Department for Sepsis or Septic Shock

Acute circulatory failure that combines hypovolemia, vasoplegia and cardiac dysfunction plays a major role in the development of sepsis-related organ dysfunction. Pathophysiological mechanisms are multiple and complex. The objective of the GENESIS study is to determine the impact of early haemodynamic assessment using echocardiography in association with a therapeutic algorithm (intervention arm), when compared with standard of care based on the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommendations (control arm), on the development of organ dysfunctions in patients admitted to the Emergency Department for sepsis or septic shock.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sepsis is currently defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction secondary to a dysregulated host response to infection (Sepsis-3). Septic shock is a subgroup of patients who also have sustained arterial hypotension requiring vasopressors and tissue dysoxia. The mortality varies from 10 to 40% depending on the severity. The latest "bundles" of the SSC request to perform within the first hour of sepsis identification a fluid loading of 30 mL/kg of crystalloids in the presence of hypotension, and to initiate a vasopressor support in case of persistent hypotension to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg. However, early fluid resuscitation is not necessarily associated with an improvement of sepsis prognosis and may even be deleterious when leading to excessive positive fluid balance. Accordingly, the SSC recommends investigating a personalized approach to define for each patient the appropriate volume of fluids to be administered according to the initial mechanism of sepsis-induced cardiovascular failure. Echocardiography is currently recommended as a first-line modality to identify the origin of acute circulatory failure, sepsis remaining the leading cause. It has been shown to alter ongoing treatment based on the sole SSC recommendations in the intensive care unit. In contrast, the impact of hemodynamic assessment using echocardiography at the early stage of sepsis in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) is unknown.

In this randomized trial, patients will be either assessed hemodynamically using transthoracic echocardiography to guide early therapeutic management (intervention arm) or managed according to standards of care based on current SSC recommendations (control arm). Early echocardiography will be performed after 500 mL of fluid loading initiated upon identification of septic patients based on the qSOFA score (hemodynamic criterion required: systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg). This will allow identifying the hemodynamic profile at the origin of sepsis-induced circulatory failure and to monitor both the efficacy and tolerance of fluid resuscitation, or of any other therapeutic intervention (e.g., inotropic support) according to a predefined therapeutic algorithm. Patients allocated to the control arm will be managed conventionally according to current SSC recommendations, including a standardized fluid loading of 30 mL/kg.

Organ dysfunctions will be assessed in the two study arms by the SOFA score 24 hours after randomization and patient will be followed up until hospital discharge to determine outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

312

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Albi, France, 81000
        • Recruiting
        • CH d'Albi
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Arthur BAISSE, MD
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Withdrawn
        • Bordeaux university hospital
      • Eaubonne, France, 95600
        • Recruiting
        • CH d'Eaubonne - Montmorency
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maxime GAUTIER, MD
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Recruiting
        • Grenoble University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • DAMIEN VIGLINO, MD
      • Le Chesnay, France, 78150
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital de Versailles
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ludovic DALLE, MD
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Recruiting
        • Limgoes university hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • LAFON Thomas, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • BAISSE Arthur, MD
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Recruiting
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cécile DELAHAYE, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Recruiting
        • Nantes university hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Philippe LE CONTE, MD
      • Nice, France, 06600
        • Recruiting
        • Nice University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Lariboisière
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anthony CHAUVIN, MD
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Recruiting
        • Poitiers university hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolas MARJANOVIC, MD
        • Contact:
      • Saint-Pierre, France, 97410
        • Recruiting
        • La réunion university hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adrien VAGUE, MD
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • Toulouse University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frédéric BALEN, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to the ED
  • Age ≥ 18 years and affiliation to Social Security
  • With sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition):

Clinically suspected or documented acute infection

AND a quick score Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) ≥ 2 points with:

  • Systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg (1 point) requiring fluid loading
  • AND encephalopathy (1 point) OR respiratory rate ≥ 22 cpm (1 point) AND a systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg after 500 mL of crystalloid vascular filling - Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decision to limit care or moribund status
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Subject under juridical protection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm
Assessment using an early transthoracic echocardiography (after 500 mL of fluids) to identify the hemodynamic profile responsible for the acute circulatory failure associated with sepsis / septic shock and to guide ongoing treatment (therapeutic algorithm) and monitor its efficacy and tolerance.
In the intervention arm, echocardiography will be performed immediately and potentially repeated to confirm the need for additional fluid resuscitation up to 30 mL/kg in the presence of persisting hypovolemia, or not (e.g., severe ventricular dysfunction). A therapeutic algorithm will allow standardized impact on ongoing management according to the hemodynamic profile identified by early echocardiography. After the completion of initial fluid resuscitation up to 30 mL/kg if required, a new echocardiographic assessment will be systematically performed by the same operator to stop or not fluid resuscitation, and to potentially initiate another treatment according to both the hemodynamic profile and clinical context.
Other: Control arm
Conventional management according to current standards of care based on SSC recommendations, including a standardized fluid resuscitation of 30 mL/kg.
In the control arm, patients will be treated according to standards of care based on current SSC recommendations, including a fluid resuscitation of 30 mL/kg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: change from Hour 0 at Day 1
Crude variation of the SOFA score between inclusion and 24h following randomization.
change from Hour 0 at Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interruption of fluid resuscitation
Time Frame: Hour 3
Number and proportion of patients in whom echocardiography performed in the ED (intervention arm) modified ongoing therapy based on SSC recommendations (standard of care) according to the hemodynamic profile. Interruption of fluid resuscitation before having administrated 30 mL/kg
Hour 3
Maintains of fluid resuscitation
Time Frame: Hour 3
Number and proportion of patients in whom echocardiography performed in the ED (intervention arm) modified ongoing therapy based on SSC recommendations (standard of care) according to the hemodynamic profile. Fluid resuscitation maintained beyond 30 mL/kg
Hour 3
Initiation of inotropes
Time Frame: Hour 3
Number and proportion of patients in whom echocardiography performed in the ED (intervention arm) modified ongoing therapy based on SSC recommendations (standard of care) according to the hemodynamic profile. Initiation of inotropes
Hour 3
Initiation of vasopressor support
Time Frame: Hour 3
Number and proportion of patients in whom echocardiography performed in the ED (intervention arm) modified ongoing therapy based on SSC recommendations (standard of care) according to the hemodynamic profile. Initiation of vasopressor support
Hour 3
Therapeutic modification
Time Frame: Hour 3
Number and proportion of patients in whom echocardiography performed in the ED (intervention arm) modified ongoing therapy based on SSC recommendations (standard of care) according to the hemodynamic profile. Therapeutic modification directly related to the echocardiographic examination
Hour 3
Persisting hypovolemia
Time Frame: Hour 0
Number and proportion of patients presenting at the time of early hemodynamic assessment using echocardiography (intervention arm)
Hour 0
Left ventricular failure
Time Frame: Hour 0
Number and proportion of patients presenting at the time of early hemodynamic assessment using echocardiography (intervention arm)
Hour 0
Vasoplegia with left ventricular hyperkinesia
Time Frame: Hour 0
Number and proportion of patients presenting at the time of early hemodynamic assessment using echocardiography (intervention arm)
Hour 0
Right ventricular failure
Time Frame: Hour 0
Number and proportion of patients presenting at the time of early hemodynamic assessment using echocardiography (intervention arm)
Hour 0
Stabilized hemodynamic status
Time Frame: Hour 0
Number and proportion of patients presenting at the time of early hemodynamic assessment using echocardiography (intervention arm). Stabilized hemodynamic status (none of above-mentioned abnormalities) due to adequate management of acute circulatory failure (avoid any deleterious therapeutic change).
Hour 0
Hydrostatic pulmonary edema
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Number of Hydrostatic pulmonary edema (cardiogenic or volume overload) since potentially related to excessive fluid loading
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Supraventricular arrhythmias
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Number of Supraventricular arrhythmias since potentially related to the initiation of positive inotropes
through study completion, an average of 1 month
ventricular arrhythmias
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Number of ventricular arrhythmias since potentially related to the initiation of positive inotropes
through study completion, an average of 1 month
acute coronary syndrome,
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Number of acute coronary syndrome since potentially related to the initiation of positive inotropes
through study completion, an average of 1 month
ischemic stroke
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Number of ischemic stroke since potentially related to the initiation of positive inotropes
through study completion, an average of 1 month
hemorrhagic stroke
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Number of hemorrhagic stroke since potentially related to the initiation of positive inotropes
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Lactate clearance
Time Frame: Hour 0 to Hour 6
Lactate clearance (lactate 6h after randomization compared to lactate at baseline)
Hour 0 to Hour 6
septic shock
Time Frame: Hour 24
Number and proportion of patients who developed septic shock 24 h after inclusion
Hour 24
Patient course
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Patient course after emergency department discharge: hospitalization in regular ward (medicine / surgery), stepdown unit or intensive care unit.
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 7 and through study completion, an average of 1 month
Mortality (all-cause and sepsis-related) at Day 7 and at hospital discharge
Day 7 and through study completion, an average of 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 23, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on early transthoracic echocardiography

3
Subscribe