Pix2pix Networks for Scheimpflug Corneal Tomography Image Generation

October 15, 2020 updated by: Khaled Abdelazeem, Assiut University

Pix2pix Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Scheimpflug Camera Color-coded Corneal Tomography Image Generation

Computer-aided medical image analysis has advantages, but requires large amounts of training data, which are scarce and costly to obtain, are subject to privacy concerns, and are often highly imbalanced, with over-representation of common conditions and poor representation of rare conditions. Consequently, some methods have been proposed to generate artificial medical images using generative adversarial networks (GANs). Computer aided diagnosis of keratoconus is an emerging research field that may benefit greatly from medical image synthesis, which can affordably provide an arbitrary number of sufficiently diverse synthetic images that mimic real Pentacam images. A new conditional GAN, the pix2pix cGAN, has not been used in this context to date. Here, investigators will assess the efficacy of a cGAN implementing pix2pix image translation for image synthesis of color-coded Pentacam 4-map refractive displays of clinical and subclinical keratoconus as well as normal corneas.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

923

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Refractive surgery candidates with unilateral, bilateral, or forme fruste keratoconus, obtained between July 2014 and March 2019 at private eye center, Assiut, Egypt.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Keratoconus group:

    • Presence of a central protrusion of the cornea with Fleischer ring, Vogt striae, or both by slitlamp examination.
    • irregular cornea determined by distorted keratometry mires and distortion of retinoscopic red reflex or both in addition to the following topographic findings as summarized by Pińero and colleagues :
    • focal steepening located in a zone of protrusion surrounded by concentrically decreasing power zones
    • focal areas with dioptric (D) values >47.0D
    • inferior- superior(I-S) asymmetry measured to be > 1.4 D
    • Angling of the hemimeridians in an asymmetric or broken bowtie pattern with skewing of the steepest radial axis(SRAX) .

Suspicious group:

• Defined as subtle corneal tomographic changes as the aforementioned keratoconus abnormalities in the absence of slit- lamp or visual acuity changes typical of keratoconus (forme fruste keratoconus).

Normal group:

  • Refractive surgery candidates
  • Refractive error of less than 8.0 D sphere
  • Less than 3.0 D of astigmatism
  • without clinical, topographic or tomographic signs of keratoconus or suspect keratoconus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Systemic disease

    • Other corneal disease such as pellucid marginal degeneration
    • History of trauma
    • Corneal surgery such as corneal cross- linking for progressive keratoconus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Keratoconus

Those with a clinical diagnosis of keratoconus such as:

a) the presence of a central protrusion of the cornea with Fleischer ring, Vogt striae, or both by slitlamp examination.(b) an irregular cornea determined by distorted keratometry mires and distortion of retinoscopic red reflex or both in addition to the following topographic findings as summarized by Pińero and colleagues: focal steepening located in a zone of protrusion surrounded by concentrically decreasing power zones, focal areas with dioptric (D) values >47.0D, inferior- superior(I-S) asymmetry measured to be > 1.4 D or angling of the hemimeridians in an asymmetric or broken bowtie pattern with skewing of the steepest radial axis (SRAX) 2.

Pentacam Sheimpflug system(Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, software V.1.15r4 n7) is used for imaging of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea to obtain corneal tomographic maps.
Subclinical keratoconus
Defined as subtle corneal tomographic changes as the aforementioned keratoconus abnormalities in the absence of slit- lamp or visual acuity changes typical of keratoconus (subclinical keratoconus).
Pentacam Sheimpflug system(Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, software V.1.15r4 n7) is used for imaging of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea to obtain corneal tomographic maps.
Normal
This group comprised refractive surgery candidates and subjects applying for a contact lens fitting with a refractive error of less than 8.0 D sphere with less than 3.0 D of astigmatism and without clinical, topographic or tomographic signs of keratoconus nor suspected keratoconus.
Pentacam Sheimpflug system(Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, software V.1.15r4 n7) is used for imaging of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea to obtain corneal tomographic maps.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Scheimpflug camera color-coded corneal tomography images created by pix2pix conditional adversarial network (pix2pix cGAN)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17300483

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eye Diseases

Clinical Trials on Scheimpflug Camera Corneal Tomography

3
Subscribe