The Effects of Cannabidiol on the Driving Ability of Healthy Adults

August 21, 2022 updated by: Toni Marie Rudisill, West Virginia University

The Effects of Cannabidiol on the Driving Ability of Healthy Adults: a Clinical Trial

A randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, exploratory two-arm trial to assess the effects of CBD on driving ability along with changes in psychological status (i.e. mood, drowsiness, sedation) and cognitive function. Forty healthy West Virginia University (WVU) students will be allocated and randomized to receive: (1) 300 mg of pure CBD oil or (N=20) (2) placebo matched in appearance and taste (N=20). After consuming the study drug, each individual will participate in a 25-35-minute driving simulation and their driving performance measured. To assess changes in psychological status (i.e. mood, drowsiness, sedation) and drug impairment-related cognitive function, the Visual Analog Mood Scale, Stanford Sleepiness Scale , Digital Symbol Substitution Test, Trail Making Test Part A and B, Psychomotor Vigilance Test, and Simple Reaction Time test will also be administered to participants at baseline (prior to study drug consumption) and following completion of the driving simulation test. The entire protocol will be completed in one day and should take 4-4.5 hours to complete for each participant.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
        • West Virginia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1) the participant must be currently enrolled as a WVU student, 2) be 18-30 years of age at time of study, 3) have a current drivers' license issued from any state in the United States, 4) has driven at least once in the past 30 days 5) is able to speak and read English, 6) is willing to be randomized and comply with study requirements including a urine drug test on the day they consent to participate in the experiment and complete a test drive to ensure the absence of simulation sickness, 7) not currently taking any daily prescription medications other than birth control, 8) have not been diagnosed with any serious chronic disease by a licensed healthcare provider (including but not limited to Alzheimer's and related dementias, Parkinson's disease or other neurodegenerative disorder, major depressive or anxiety disorder, schizophrenia or other serious mental illness, arrhythmias, cataracts, glaucoma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, epilepsy, sleep apnea, and fibromyalgia), and 9) has an individual able to drive them home after testing or is willing to be driven home by study staff after testing completion.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if they 1) currently smoke or use tobacco products, 2) have used illegal drugs (including cocaine/crack, heroin, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, inhalants, phencyclidine, lysergic acid, mushrooms, or marijuana) in the past 30 days, 3) has consumed CBD in the past 7 days, or 4) is currently pregnant or lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Participant will either be given a placebo . After consumption of the study drug, the participant will wait for 120 minutes to allow for digestion and for CBD to begin taking effect. Next, individuals will undergo a driving simulation and all participants will drive the same course. The simulator presents the individual with real life driving scenarios and is equipped with screens, a steering wheel, signals, and pedals. The participant will be instructed to drive the course for 25-35 minutes. They will be instructed to follow normal driving rules. The simulation will include highway, suburban, rural, and urban driving scenarios which will incorporate turns, changes in speed, and avoidance of cars/pedestrians.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 300 mg Cannabidiol (CBD) oil
Participant will either be given a 300mg dosage of CBD oil. After consumption of the study drug, the participant will wait for 120 minutes to allow for digestion and for CBD to begin taking effect. Next, individuals will undergo a driving simulation and all participants will drive the same course. The simulator presents the individual with real life driving scenarios and is equipped with screens, a steering wheel, signals, and pedals. The participant will be instructed to drive the course for 25-35 minutes. They will be instructed to follow normal driving rules. The simulation will include highway, suburban, rural, and urban driving scenarios which will incorporate turns, changes in speed, and avoidance of cars/pedestrians.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Driving Performance - Percent of Time Spent Out of Lane
Time Frame: 1.5 hour post intervention
From driving simulation. A greater percentage of time spent driving out of lane indicates worse performance. Min=0 max=100%
1.5 hour post intervention
Driving Performance - Number of Collisions.
Time Frame: 1.5 hour post intervention
From driving simulation. A greater number of collisions indicate worse performance. Min=0 max=infinity
1.5 hour post intervention
Driving Performance - Brake Reaction Time
Time Frame: 1.5 hour post intervention
Mean reaction time to stimuli from driving simulation. Longer reaction times indicate worst performance. Min=0 max=infinity
1.5 hour post intervention
Driving Performance - Lateral Position in Lane
Time Frame: 1.5 hour post intervention
Mean standard deviation of lateral position in lane under consistent speed from driving simulation. Larger standard deviations in lane position indicate worse performance. Min=0 max=infinity
1.5 hour post intervention
Driving Performance-percent of Time Spent Driving Above Speed Limit
Time Frame: 1.5 hour post intervention
From driving simulation. This is the percent of drive time that the driver spent driving above the speed limit. Greater percentage indicates worse performance.
1.5 hour post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Baseline VAMS for Mental Sedation
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Visual Analog Mood Scale (VAMS). Mental sedation: sum of scores from questions 1, 4, 11, 13 on VAMS - higher scores indicate more mental sedation. Total min=0 Total max=400
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline VAMS--Physical Sedation
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Visual Analog Mood Scale (VAMS). Physical sedation: sum of scores from questions 3, 5, 6, 16 on VAMS - higher scores indicate more physical sedation. Total min=0 Total max=400
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline SSS
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS). Self-reported sleepiness, The SSS is a Likert-type scale which assess mental and physical sedation and sleepiness, respectively, at that moment and time. SSS only consists of 1 question that is scaled from 1 to 7, with 7 being a higher or worse score (i.e. more sleepy and sedated)
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline TMT Part A
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Trail Making Test (TMT). Time to accurately complete Part A . The TMT measures executive function and consists of two parts; the first part requires participants to connect numbers in ascending order, while the second part requires individuals to connect numbers and letters in sequence. The test is scored by the time it takes to accurately complete each test. Increases in time correlate with greater impairment.
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline TMT Part B
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Trail Making Test (TMT). Time to accurately complete Part B. The TMT measures executive function and consists of two parts; the first part requires participants to connect numbers in ascending order, while the second part requires individuals to connect numbers and letters in sequence. The test is scored by the time it takes to accurately complete each test. Increases in time correlate with greater impairment.
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline DSST
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Number of correct symbols completed within 60 seconds. The test is scored by the degree of completion and accuracy over a timed 60 second period. More accurate completion (i.e. higher the score) indicates better cognitive functioning. Min=0 Max=90
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline PVT
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT). Mean reaction time (in milliseconds) when responding to a stimuli that appears on a computer screen. Longer reaction time means worse vigilance. Min=0 max=infinity
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline SRT for Sound #1
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Simple Reaction Time test (SRT). Mean reaction time to stimuli that appears on a computer screen. Longer reaction times mean a decrease in reaction time. Min=0 max=infinity. Two separate sounds were emitted. Data were obtained for participants reaction to each separate sound
4 hours after baseline
Change in Baseline SRT--sound #2
Time Frame: 4 hours after baseline
Simple Reaction Time test (SRT). Mean reaction time to stimuli that appears on a computer screen. Longer reaction times mean a decrease in reaction time. Min=0 max=infinity. Two separate sounds were emitted. Data were obtained for participants reaction to each separate sound
4 hours after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Toni Marie Rudisill, MS, PhD, West Virginia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2007073792

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We do not plan to share these data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on 300 mg Cannabidiol (CBD) oil

Subscribe