The Association of Visceral Adiposity Index With Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

October 12, 2020 updated by: Zelal Adibelli, Uşak University
The visceral adiposity index (VAI) has been developed, an indicator for the metabolic function of VAT. Previous studies have confirmed the association between the VAI and CKD prevalence. In this study, we attempted to investigate the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and visceral adiposity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Data were collected from patients with stage 2-5 CKD aged 18 and 80 years and were not on dialysis. These patients were followed up in the Nephrology Department of the Usak University Research and Training Hospital for at least 1 year between December 2017 and November 2018. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Usak University School of Medicine. Of 218 patients with stage 2-5 CKD, only 129 were eligible for the study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: missing data, patients older than 80 years, patients taking cholesterol and lipid lowering drugs and steroids. Demographic data (age, gender, and medical history such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, medications) were collected from the electronic records of the patients, and physical examinations such as blood pressure measurement after 5 minutes of rest, height, weight, waist circumference (WC) measured at the level midway from the lower rib margin and the iliac crest in the midaxillary line while the patients were standing with their feet 25-30 cm apart were performed. Laboratory samples were collected from the patients, transported to the laboratory, and stored at -80°C until analysis. HbA1c levels were measured using the cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography system (Variant II Turbo HbA1c analyzer, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). TG, HDL, uric acid, calcium, phosphorus, bicarbonate, urine protein, and creatinine levels were analyzed with the spectrophotometric method using Architect c8000 automated analyzer and original Abbott kits (Abbott Diagnostics Inc, Park City, IL, USA). Two milliliters of blood was added to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (1 mg/ml blood) and mixed thoroughly to perform complete blood count by Mindray BC 6800 (Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China). Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was analyzed with the electrochemiluminescence method using the ADVIA Centaur analyzer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Munich, Germany). Serum creatinine levels were measured over a 1-year interval. The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. The stages of CKD were defined according to eGFR as stage 2 mild CKD (eGFR = 89-60 mL/min/1.73m2), stage 3a moderate CKD (eGFR = 45-59 mL/min/1.73m2), stage 3b moderate CKD (eGFR = 30-44 mL/min/1.73m2), stage 4 severe CKD (eGFR = 15-29 mL/min/1.73m2), and stage 5 end-stage CKD (eGFR = <15 mL/min/1.73m2). The eGFR change was calculated as the percentage of change in eGFR in 1 year to baseline eGFR. VAI was calculated using the formula (WC/36.8+(1.89xBMI))x(TG/0.81)x(1.52/HDL) for women and (WC/39.68+(1.88xBMI))x(TG/1.03)x(1.31/HDL) for men. BMI was calculated by dividing weight to square of height.

Data were analyzed with the IBM SPSS 22 statistical program. Descriptive statistics were used to define the main characteristics of the patients. Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnoff statistical tests were used to assess the normality of the data. All parameters except parathyroid hormone levels were normally distributed. The correlation between the eGFR difference, VAI values, and other parameters was tested with the Pearson correlation test. The difference between the patients with different CKD stages according to the eGFR change and VAI values were tested by the one-way ANOVA test. The independent samples t-test was used to investigate the difference between patients with and without DM and hypertension according to VAI values and eGFR change. Partial Correlation is used for to investigate the correlation between the two variables, where the effect of other variables is kept constant and controlled for both variables. A p value of less than 0.05 was defined as significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

129

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Select One
      • Usak, Select One, Turkey, 64200
        • Uşak University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic kidney disease patients who were followed up in the Nephrology Department of the Usak University Research and Training Hospital for at least 1 year between December 2017 and November 2018.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with stage 2-5 CKD
  • aged 18 and 80 years
  • were not on dialysis
  • patients were followed up in the Nephrology Department of the Usak University Research and Training Hospital for at least 1 year between December 2017 and November 2018.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria were as follows:

missing data, patients older than 80 years, patients taking cholesterol and lipid lowering drugs and/or steroids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
progression of chronic kidney disease
Time Frame: one year
increase in eGFR of chronic kidney disease patients in one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 12, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on eGFR

Subscribe