- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04599296
Postoperative Hip Bracing After Hip Arthroscopy
December 7, 2023 updated by: Mia Hagen, University of Washington
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Postoperative Hip Bracing After Arthroscopic Osteoplasty and Labral Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
Hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) involves reshaping of the osseous sources of impingement ("osteoplasty") and treatment of impingement-associated labral tears with labral repair.
Postoperative hip braces are advocated to decrease postoperative pain by offloading hip musculature.
However there are no studies looking at efficacy of hip braces after hip arthroscopy, and on average 50% of high-volume hip arthroscopists use bracing.
The objective of this study is to use a randomized controlled trial to test the cited benefits of postoperative hip bracing on short term patient reported pain scores, validated hip-specific pain scores, and physical exam findings of hip flexor tendonitis.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) involves reshaping of the osseous sources of impingement ("osteoplasty") and treatment of impingement-associated labral tears with labral repair.
The hip joint is subluxated with traction to accomplish this procedure.
The diagnoses of FAIS and the incidence of hip arthroscopy have both increased dramatically in the last 20 years in the US -- in a recent study using IBM Marketscan to evaluate rates of hip arthroscopic treatment of FAIS, the investigators found this incidence doubled from 1.2 to 2.1 per 100,000 person-years in just a 3-year period.
Despite the increasing incidence of hip arthroscopy in the US, on a recent review the investigators have found few evidence-based studies on postoperative care.
A particular area of debate is the use of postoperative hip braces.
Postoperative hip braces are advocated to decrease postoperative pain by offloading hip musculature.
They may also prevent overuse of the hip flexors by supporting the hip during gait.
However there are no studies looking at efficacy of hip braces after hip arthroscopy, and on average 50% of high-volume hip arthroscopists use bracing.
The utility of bracing is important because hip braces are expensive (averaging $350-$600): if there are over 7000 hip arthroscopies performed nationwide and 50% of surgeons use hip braces, this amounts to over $2,000,000.
The investigator's overall objective is to use a randomized controlled trial to test the cited benefits of postoperative hip bracing on short term patient reported pain scores, validated hip-specific pain scores, and physical exam findings of hip flexor tendonitis.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
72
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Kimberlee E Moomey
- Phone Number: 206-520-8436
- Email: kmoomey@uw.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- University of Washington
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years to 58 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age 14-60 on date of surgery
- Patient seen at the institution for the study
- Patient scheduled to undergo arthroscopic osteoplasty and labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any patient anyone who cannot follow up in person in clinic for the 6-week postoperative visit.
- Any patient with planned iliopsoas tendon release for tendonitis at the time of surgery, or who undergoes iliopsoas tendon release on the day of surgery (this may be a confounding variable as this is study looking at ability of the hip brace to prevent hip flexor tendonitis after surgery).
- Non-English speaking patients (due to limited validation of the patient reported outcome measures in non-English speaking populations).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Hip Brace
This group will be assigned to wear a hip brace post surgery.
|
Hip brace
|
No Intervention: No Intervention
This group will not be assigned a hip brace after surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
patient numerical pain ranking scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery date
|
Validated pain scale, subject reported.
Min 0, Max 10, Higher score means worse outcome.
|
6 weeks after surgery date
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
HOOS - Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: at 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
questionnaire used to assess the patient's opinion about their hip and associated problems and to evaluate symptoms and functional limitations related to the hip during a therapeutic process.
Min 0, Max 100.
Lower score means worse outcome.
|
at 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
VR12 - Veteran RAND 12 item health survey
Time Frame: at 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
general health outcome survey.
The results of the VR-12 are summarized as two scores - a Mental Component Score (MCS) and a Physical Component Score (PCS).
The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations).
The United States population average PCS and MCS are both 50 points.
The United States population standard deviation is 10 points.
Therefore, each increment of 10 points above or below 50 corresponds to one standard deviation away from the population average.
|
at 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
Patient using non-steroidal medication
Time Frame: 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
yes / no
|
6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
Patient received cortisone injection to hip flexor sheath or bursa
Time Frame: 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
yes / no
|
6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
Patient using opioid medication
Time Frame: 6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
yes / no
|
6 week and 6 month after surgery date
|
NPRS - numerical pain ranking scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks and 6 months after surgery date
|
Validated pain scale, subject reported.
Min 0, Max 10, Higher score means worse outcome.
|
3 weeks and 6 months after surgery date
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mia Hagen, MD, University of Washington
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Shin JJ, McCrum CL, Mauro CS, Vyas D. Pain Management After Hip Arthroscopy: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3288-3298. doi: 10.1177/0363546517734518. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
- Adib F, Johnson AJ, Hennrikus WL, Nasreddine A, Kocher M, Yen YM. Iliopsoas tendonitis after hip arthroscopy: prevalence, risk factors and treatment algorithm. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Dec 24;5(4):362-369. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny049. eCollection 2018 Dec.
- Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F, Lyman S, Mayman D. Use of Hip Arthroscopy and Risk of Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Population-Based Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016 Apr;32(4):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
- Bozic KJ, Chan V, Valone FH 3rd, Feeley BT, Vail TP. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):140-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.039. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
- Yao JJ, Cook SB, Gee AO, Kweon CY, Hagen MS. What Is the Survivorship After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Large-database Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2266-2273. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001370.
- Philippon MJ, Decker MJ, Giphart JE, Torry MR, Wahoff MS, LaPrade RF. Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas tendinitis: an in vivo electromyography study. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1777-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546511406848. Epub 2011 May 12.
- Domb BG, Sgroi TA, VanDevender JC. Physical Therapy Protocol After Hip Arthroscopy: Clinical Guidelines Supported by 2-Year Outcomes. Sports Health. 2016 Jul;8(4):347-54. doi: 10.1177/1941738116647920. Epub 2016 May 12.
- Gupta A, Suarez-Ahedo C, Redmond JM, Gerhardt MB, Hanypsiak B, Stake CE, Finch NA, Domb BG. Best Practices During Hip Arthroscopy: Aggregate Recommendations of High-Volume Surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep;31(9):1722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 May 14.
- Cvetanovich GL, Lizzio V, Meta F, Chan D, Zaltz I, Nho SJ, Makhni EC. Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;33(11):1998-2005. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.045. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
- Bolia IK, Briggs KK, Matheny L, Philippon MJ. Survey results from an international hip course: comparison between experts and non-experts on hip arthroscopy clinical practice and post-operative rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1270-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5289-4. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
- Truntzer JN, Shapiro LM, Hoppe DJ, Abrams GD, Safran MR. Hip arthroscopy in the United States: an update following coding changes in 2011. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Mar 23;4(3):250-257. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnx004. eCollection 2017 Aug.
- Hagen M, Westermann R, Lynch T, Rosneck J. Rehabilitation for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Conservative Care and Postoperative Practice. J Hip Surg. 2018;02(04):189-193. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676448
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2023
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 16, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
October 22, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 11, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 7, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00010038
- 5P30AR072572-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acetabular Labral Tear
-
University of PittsburghEnrolling by invitationAcetabular Labral Tear | Hip Impingement SyndromeUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruitingHip Injuries | Femoro Acetabular Impingement | Acetabular Labral TearEgypt
-
Peking University Third HospitalEnrolling by invitationFemoroacetabular Impingement | Acetabular Labral TearChina
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Active, not recruitingAcetabular Labrum Tear | SLAP Lesion | Bankart Lesions | Rotator Cuff Tears | Labral Tear, Glenoid | Anterior Shoulder InstabilityUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterRecruitingLabral Tear, Glenoid | Femoral Acetabular ImpingementUnited States
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedPain, Postoperative | Femoro Acetabular Impingement | Hip Labral TearUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterRecruitingPain | Opioid Use | Labral Tear, Glenoid | Femoral Acetabular ImpingementUnited States
-
University of OxfordArthritis Research UK; The Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandUnknownAcetabular Labrum TearUnited Kingdom
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompletedAcetabular Labrum TearChina
-
Revalesio CorporationWithdrawn
Clinical Trials on Hip brace
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesPediatric Orthopaedic Society of North AmericaActive, not recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted
-
St. Justine's HospitalActive, not recruitingScoliosis | Idiopathic ScoliosisCanada
-
University of California, Los AngelesRecruitingSpinal Fusion | Chronic Lower Back PainUnited States
-
Barbara ŁysońCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedNeuromuscular ScoliosisKorea, Republic of
-
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.CompletedHip Dislocation, Congenital | Congenital Deformity of Hip JointUnited States
-
St. Justine's HospitalNot yet recruitingScoliosis | Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisCanada
-
University Hospital, GrenobleClinical Investigation Centre for Innovative Technology Network; University...RecruitingIdiopathic ScoliosisFrance
-
Laval UniversityFonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec; Natural Sciences and Engineering... and other collaboratorsCompleted