Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Plasma Jet

October 24, 2020 updated by: Rossen Mihaylov Hazarbassanov, MD, PhD, Federal University of São Paulo

Plasma Jet Approach for Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients

PURPOSE: The investigators propose a new treatment for refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) patients with plasma jet to remove the hyperkeratinization layer from the lid margin to unblock terminal gland ducts and use thermal stimulation to enhance meibum delivery.

METHODS: A prospective, interventional clinical safety and efficacy trial with 25 patients from the Department of Ophthalmology at Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP) to determine the efficacy and safety of the treatment of refractory MGD patients with plasma jet on both upper and lower lids. Patients will be submitted to an ophthalmology workup with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (ETDRS chart) and dry eye questionnaires (DEQ-5 and OSDI). Bulbar redness, tear film meniscus height, noninvasive breakup time (NIKBUT), meibography under infrared light will be measured with Keratograph (Oculus®). Following, tear film osmolarity (i-PenTM), meibomian gland expression, and Marx line assessment. All exams were performed at the baseline, 30 days, and 90 days after the plasma jet application.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most prevalent conditions at an ophthalmology office that may reach 15 to 40% of prevalence in the population. It is didactically classified as two forms that exist as a continuum: aqueous deficient dry eye (ADDE) and evaporative dry eye (EDE). In EDE patients Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) is the major etiology in which the insufficient meibum secretion can be decreased by cicatricial (trachoma, ocular pemphigoid, erythema multiforme) and non-cicatricial causes (skin disorders such as acne rosacea and atopic dermatitis, blepharitis).

MGD pathophysiology can be explained by hyposecretion or ducts obstruction, resulting in low delivery of phospholipids and cholesterol that grant stability to the tear film. Hyposecretion of the sebaceous glands can result from intrinsic (age, ethnicity, hormonal profile) and extrinsic factors (chronic blepharitis, Demodex folliculorum infestation, contact lens wear, topical drops). Furthermore, the duct obstruction occurs in a consequence to cicatricial rearrangement of the terminal ducts or by non-cicatricial hyperkeratinization of the lid margins, leading to increased duct pressure, dilatation, and disuse atrophy of the glands.

Questionnaires such as Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Dry Eye Questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5) that evaluate the grade of severity of DED and assessment of MGD by noninvasive tear breakup time (BUT) evaluation that measures tear film stability and by meibography under infrared light that analyses gland vitality are central when dealing with any EDE patient.

The treatment of MGD can be very challenging in cases where a clinical approach with non-preserved ocular lubricants, lid hygiene, and warm compresses are not sufficient. Oral tetracyclines can be a good alternative in cases of evident lid inflammation to reduce bacterial colonization and inhibit collagenase action although long-term use intolerance limits its use.

Thermodynamic treatment with a device that performs controlled local heating and massage of the ducts showed clinical improvement and symptoms reduction whereas multiple sessions are necessary. Mechanical debridement of gland ducts terminals with scalpel blade also improved ocular symptoms and gland function of patients with EDE with MGD. A combination of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and gland expression has been shown to be an effective treatment to MGD with increases in BUT and improvement of ocular symptoms related to DED.

Plasma jet has been successfully used in Dermatology and is an increasingly popular method for smoothing wrinkles, blunt blepharoplasty, as well as performing thermal ablation for superficial skin layers.

The investigators propose a new treatment for refractory MGD patients with plasma jet with a device used in Dermatology to remove the hyperkeratinization layer from the lid margin to unblock terminal gland ducts and use thermal stimulation to enhance meibum delivery.

METHODS A prospective, interventional clinical safety and efficacy trial to determine the efficacy and safety of the treatment of refractory MGD patients with plasma jet will be conducted at Ophthalmology Department at Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP) with 25 Caucasian patients.

All patients will be instructed about the study design and will be given full access to the results at any time of the protocol. All will sign an informed consent form and have their identity protected in accordance with patient medical confidentiality. This case series is in accordance with Good Clinical Practices and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patients will be submitted to an ophthalmology workup with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (ETDRS chart), dry eye questionnaires (DEQ-5 and OSDI), corneal topography, bulbar redness, tear meniscus height, noninvasive breakup time (NBUT), tear film osmolarity, meibography under infrared light, meibomian gland expression and Marx line assessment. All exams will be performed before and 30 days after the plasma jet application.

Patients will be instructed about the procedure by the ophthalmologist and a nurse and the procedure will be performed after topical anesthesia with lidocaine 2.0%. The plasma jet will be applied 3 times on both superior and inferior terminal gland ducts in the lid margins with a 14.4mm tip and intensity of 5 on the device (0,9W) reaching only the superficial epidermis. Patients will receive topical antibiotics and corticosteroids after the procedure. During all periods (90 days) patients will use sodium hyaluronate 0,15% and actinoquinol at the recommended dosage of twice a day.

The software program GraphPad Prism version 7.0 will be used to conduct the statistical analyses. Continuous data distribution will be verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test. Data will be analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Wilcoxon test considering 2-time points for nonparametric variables and paired t-test for parametric variables. All p values of < 0.05 will indicate statistically significant differences.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023 062
        • Departamento de Oftalmologia da Escola Paulista de Medicina - UNIFESP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
        • Department of Ophthalmology, UNIFESP&EPM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Refractory meibomian gland dysfunction;
  • Previous eyelid hygiene with warm compress in the last 6 months;
  • Previous oral intake of antibiotics and antiinflammatories in the last 6 months;
  • Previous oral tetracycline treatment for at least one month in the last 6 months;
  • DEQ-5 score greater than 6;
  • OSDI score greater than 13;
  • Tear film osmolarity greater than 308mOsm or a difference between eyes greater than 8 mOsm;
  • Meibomian gland expression greater than 8;
  • Meibomian gland expression grades 2 or 3 [Nelson 1930];

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac pacemaker or ECG Holter;
  • Other electromagnetic device implanted;
  • Epilepsy;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Metal implants in the periocular area;
  • Skin diseases in the periocular area;
  • Systemic inflammatory diseases;
  • Oncological diseases;
  • Allergy to local anesthetics;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Jett Plasma Medical Lift Application
In the study group, the plasma jet will be applied to the superior and inferior eyelid margin in both eyes.
Plasma Application versus Mechanical Debridement in refractory meibomian gland dysfunction
Active Comparator: Mechanical Debridement
In the control group, the mechanical debridement of the superior and inferior eyelid margin with a scalpel blade will be performed.
Plasma Application versus Mechanical Debridement in refractory meibomian gland dysfunction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5)
Time Frame: 30 days
Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) comprises of 5 quick questions and its score ranges from 0 to 22, with lower scores indicating a less severe disease (improvement).
30 days
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: 30 days
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) comprises of 12 questions, each one scored from 0 to 4, and the final score, on a scale from 0 to 100, result from the sum of all values divided by the number of questions answered. Lower scores indicate a less severe disease (improvement).
30 days
Bulbar redness
Time Frame: 30 days
Conjunctival hyperemia will be measured with Keratograph (Oculus®, Inc). This software grades de hyperemia in both nasal and temporal bulbar regions and in the limbal area, with a final score indicating overall ocular surface redness. Greater scores indicate greater hyperemia.
30 days
Tear film meniscus height
Time Frame: 30 days
Tear film meniscus height will be measured with Keratograph (Oculus®, Inc). This software allows individual measurente of the tear film meniscus height (in milimeters) that will be performed in three regions (nasal, central and temporal tear meniscus) and the arithmetic average will be considered to evaluate treatment outcomes, with increased heights indicanting more tear volume.
30 days
Non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT)
Time Frame: 30 days
Non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) will be assessed first with Keratograph (Oculus®, Inc). The NITBUT evaluate the tear film stability by registering the time lapse for the first rupture in the tear film to appear. Greater values indicates a more stable tear film.
30 days
Tear film osmolarity
Time Frame: 30 days
Tear film osmolarity will be measured by collecting a micro drop from the tear meniscus with i-Pen (i-Med Pharma, Inc). The tear osmolarity is used to indirect assess occular surface inflammation, with tear osmolalities greater than 308 mOsm or a difference between eyes greater than 8 mOsm indicating tear film disturbance (Dry Eye WorkShop II - DEWS II 2017).
30 days
Meibomian gland expression
Time Frame: 30 days
Meibomian gland expression will be performed using Meibomian Gland Evaluator (MGE), a special devide with precise pression, that will allow to assess meibomian glands in the slit lamp. This devices acts on five glands at a time, so meibum deliverance can be judged in quantity (is there any gland duct obstructed?) and quality (is meibum clear, cloudy or opaque?).
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5)
Time Frame: 90 days
Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) comprises of 5 quick questions and its score ranges from 0 to 22, with lower scores indicating a less severe disease (improvement).
90 days
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: 90 days
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) comprises of 12 questions, each one scored from 0 to 4, and the final score, on a scale from 0 to 100, result from the sum of all values divided by the number of questions answered. Lower scores indicate a less severe disease (improvement).
90 days
Bulbar redness
Time Frame: 90 days
Conjunctival hyperemia will be measured with Keratograph (Oculus®, Inc). This software grades de hyperemia in both nasal and temporal bulbar regions and in the limbal area, with a final score indicating overall ocular surface redness. Greater scores indicate greater hyperemia.
90 days
Tear film meniscus height
Time Frame: 90 days
Tear film meniscus height will be measured with Keratograph (Oculus®, Inc). This software allows individual measurente of the tear film meniscus height (in milimeters) that will be performed in three regions (nasal, central and temporal tear meniscus) and the arithmetic average will be considered to evaluate treatment outcomes, with increased heights indicanting more tear volume.
90 days
Non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT)
Time Frame: 90 days
Non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) will be assessed first with Keratograph (Oculus®, Inc) and then with florescein dye. The NITBUT evaluate the tear film stability by registering the time lapse for the first rupture in the tear film to appear. Greater values indicates a more stable tear film.
90 days
Tear film osmolarity
Time Frame: 90 days
Tear film osmolarity will be measured by collecting a micro drop from the tear meniscus with i-Pen (i-Med Pharma, Inc). The tear osmolarity is used to indirect assess occular surface inflammation, with tear osmolalities greater than 308 mOsm or a difference between eyes greater than 8 mOsm indicating tear film disturbance (Dry Eye WorkShop II - DEWS II 2017).
90 days
Meibomian gland expression
Time Frame: 90 days
Meibomian gland expression will be performed using Meibomian Gland Evaluator (MGE), a special devide with precise pression, that will allow to assess meibomian glands in the slit lamp. This devices acts on five glands at a time, so meibum deliverance can be judged in quantity (is there any gland duct obstructed?) and quality (is meibum clear, cloudy or opaque?).
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rossen M Hazarbassanov, MD PhD, Associate Professor in Ophthalmology (Federal University of Sao Paulo - UNIFESP)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation

Clinical Trials on Jett Plasma Medical Lift

Subscribe