Role of Lung Ultrasonography in Prediction of the Seveity and the Need for Surfactant Administration in Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

November 1, 2020 updated by: Mohammed Elyan Ahmed, Assiut University
We aim to identify the diagnostic role of a lung ultrasonography (LUS) score to predict the severity and the need for surfactant therapy in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and to compare it with a chest X-ray score.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a common problem in preterm infants. This condition is caused by deficiency of pulmonary surfactant in an immature lung and is related to morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. The incidence of RDS increases with the decreasing of gestational age (GA). The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network reports a 93 percent incidence of RDS in a cohort of extremely preterm infants (GA 28 weeks or below)1. Although the risk is lower, RDS occurs even in a significant number of late preterm infants2. Diagnosis of RDS is based on clinical manifestations, arterial blood gas and chest X-ray findings. Chest X-ray is considered a first-line imaging test for diagnosis of RDS2. Chest X-ray findings, however, are not related to the respiratory prognosis3 .

Recently, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has been used in critically ill patient and it has become an important tool for neonatologists4. Specific LUS patterns have been described for typical neonatal respiratory conditions such as RDS5, transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN)6, meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS)7, and pneumothorax8,9.As reported in The Consensus Conference on lung ultrasound, both LUS and chest X-ray are accurate in the diagnosis of RDS and TTN in neonates10.

Surfactant replacement therapy is crucial in the management of RDS. Recent guidelines recommend to treat affected babies with early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and early selective surfactant administration10. The European Association of Perinatal Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics advise surfactant administration when oxygen requirement increases despite early nCPAP treatment11,12. Some studies have recently highlighted the usefulness of LUS in predicting neonatal intensive care unit admission or the need for mechanical ventilation13,14 or nCPAP failure15. Many scores based on LUS findings have proved their reliability in adult critical care16,17. In the neonatal field few studies presented chest X-ray derived scores18 or directly compared LUS with chest ray. There are no data, to our knowledge, that compare the accuracy of LUS with chest X-ray in predicting the need for surfactant administration in infants with RDS18-20.

Basically, each lung was divided into 3 areas (upper anterior, lower anterior, and lateral) and examined using a linear microprobe through both transverse and longitudinal scans. For each lung area, a 0- to 3-point score was given (total score ranging from 0-18). The LUS score encompassed signs typical of TTN and RDS21-22 . and described the total spectrum of possible conditions (a normal aerated lung, an interstitial pattern, an alveolar pattern, and consolidation). In details, the LUS score was assigned as follows:0 indicates A-pattern (defined by the presence of the only A-lines); 1, B-pattern (defined as the presence of ≥3 well-spaced B-lines); 2, severe B pattern (defined as the presence of crowded and coalescent B lines with or without consolidations limited to the subpleural space); and 3, extended consolidations. A-lines represent reflection of pleura due to ultrasound diffusing through an airfilled lung; B-lines are due to fluid filling the interstitium (and the alveolar space if they become confluent)23,24.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 hour to 1 month (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Gestational age < 28 weeks.

  • Birth weight <1000 grams.
  • Newborns diagnosed only with RDS clinically and by chest X-Ray findings

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Gestational age < 28 weeks.

    • Birth weight <1000 grams.
    • Newborns diagnosed only with RDS clinically and by chest X-Ray findings

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Gestational age ≤ 28 weeks.

    • Birth weight ≤ 1000 grams.
    • Newborns with congenital anomalies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity lung ultrasound examination in identifying the severity and need for surfactant administration in neonates with RDS
Time Frame: baseline
Sensitivity and specificity lung ultrasound examination in identifying the severity and need for surfactant administration in neonates with RDS
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare point-of-care lung ultrasound with chest x ray in the rate of detection of RDS in neonates.
Time Frame: baseline
Compare point-of-care lung ultrasound with chest x ray in the rate of detection of RDS in neonates.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: fatma ali, professor, Assiut university children hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 20, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Ultrasound

Clinical Trials on lung ultrasound

3
Subscribe