Brain-controlled Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury (STIMO-BSI)

June 25, 2025 updated by: Jocelyne Bloch, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

In a current first-in-human study, called Stimulation Movement Overground (STIMO, NCT02936453), Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord is applied to enable individuals with chronic severe spinal cord injury (SCI) to complete intensive locomotor neurorehabilitation training. In this clinical feasibility study, it was demonstrated that EES results in an immediate enhancement of walking function, and that when applied repeatedly as part of a neurorehabilitation program, EES can improve leg motor control and trigger neurological recovery in individuals with severe SCI to a certain extent (Wagner et al. 2018).

Preclinical studies showed that linking brain activity to the onset and modulation of spinal cord stimulation protocols not only improves the usability of the stimulation, but also augments neurological recovery. Indeed, rats rapidly learned to modulate their cortical activity in order to adjust the amplitude of spinal cord stimulation protocols. This brain-spine interface allowed them to increase the amplitude of the movement of their otherwise paralyzed legs to climb up a staircase (Bonizzato et al. 2018). Moreover, gait rehabilitation enabled by this brain-spine interface (BSI) augmented plasticity and neurological recovery. When EES was correlated with cortical neuron activity during training, rats showed better recovery than when training was only supported by continuous stimulation (Bonizzato et al. 2018). This concept of brain spine-interface was validated in non-human primates (Capogrosso et al. 2016).

Clinatec (Grenoble, France) has developed a fully implantable electrocorticogram (ECoG) recording device with a 64-channel epidural electrode array capable of recording electrical signals from the motor cortex for an extended period of time and with a high signal to noise ratio the electrical signals from the motor cortex. This ECoG-based system allowed tetraplegic patients to control an exoskeleton (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550522) with up to 8 degrees of freedom for the upper limb control (Benabid et al. 2019). This device was implanted in 2 individuals so far; one of them has been using this system both at the hospital and at home for more than 3 years.

We hypothesize that ECoG-controlled EES in individuals with SCI will establish a direct bridge between the patient's motor intention and the spinal cord below the lesion, which will not only improve or restore voluntary control of leg movements, but will also boost neuroplasticity and neurological recovery when combined with neurorehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • CHUV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having completed the main phase of the STIMO study (NCT02936453).
  • SCI graded as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B, C & D
  • Level of lesion: T10 and above, based on AIS level determination by the PI, with preservation of conus function
  • The intact distance between the cone and the lesion must be at least 60 mm.
  • Focal spinal cord disorder caused by either trauma or epidural, subdural or intramedullary bleeding
  • Minimum 12 months post-injury
  • Completed in-patient rehabilitation program
  • Stable medical, physical and psychological condition as considered by Investigators
  • Able to understand and interact with the study team in French or English
  • Adequate care-giver support and access to appropriate medical care in patient's home community
  • Must agree to comply in good faith with all conditions of the study and to attend all required study training and visit
  • Must provide and sign the Informed Consent prior to any study related procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limitation of walking function based on accompanying (CNS) disorders (systemic malignant disorders, cardiovascular disorders restricting physical training, peripheral nerve disorders)
  • History of severe autonomic dysreflexia
  • Brain damage
  • Epilepsy
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Use of an intrathecal Baclofen pump.
  • Any active implanted cardiac device such as pacemaker or defibrillator.
  • Any indication that would require diathermy.
  • Any indication that would require MRI.
  • Increased risk for defibrillation.
  • Severe joint contractures disabling or restricting lower limb movements.
  • Haematological disorders with increased risk for surgical interventions (increased risk of haemorrhagic events).
  • Congenital or acquired lower limb abnormalities (affection of joints and bone).
  • Women who are pregnant (pregnancy test obligatory for women of childbearing potential) or breast feeding or not willing to take contraception.
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Spinal cord lesion due to either a neurodegenerative disease or a tumor.
  • Gastrointestinal ulcers in the last five years
  • Known or suspected eye disorders or diseases
  • Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.)
  • Any other anatomic or co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the study results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All participants
All participants receive the same intervention.
Participants are implanted bilaterally with epidural electrocorticography devices. The decoded motor intentions are driving the implanted spinal cord stimulation system. Brain-controlled spinal cord stimulation is used for training and rehabilitation to recover voluntary movements.
ARC-BSI Lumbar System for participants entering the optional extension with system upgrade: replacement of the neurostimulator, and upgrade of the WIMAGINE system and STIMO system wearable devices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Measure
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of Adverse Events possibly, probably or causally related to the procedure or device.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Safety Measure
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of device deficiencies
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WISCI II score
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 20, higher scores mean a better outcome
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
10mWT
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Weight bearing capacity
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
SCIM III score
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
6minWT
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Time Up and Go
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Maximum Voluntary Contraction
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
ASIA score
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 4, higher scores mean a worst outcome
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 56, higher scores mean a better outcome
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Gait Analysis
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Average step height, step length, amplitude of EMG activity during walking
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome
1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
BCI performance measures
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Decoding accuracy from 0-100% higher numbers mean a better outome
8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Upper Limb Neurobiomechanics
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Average range of movement, amplitude of EMG activity during upper limb movements
8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
ECoG signal stability
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Power density spectrum of the ECoG signal over each electrode
8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
SSEP
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Amplitude and latency of the cortically evoked potentials
8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jocelyne Bloch, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on STIMO-BSI system implantation

Subscribe