Superior Vena Cava Reconstruction in Patients on Hemodialysis (Hemodialysis)

March 19, 2026 updated by: Methodist Health System
The treatment objective for patients with SVC syndrome secondary to both malignant and benign etiologies is to reduce the elevated central venous pressures.1 However, the strategies are contingent upon the underlying disease process. Thus the management of SVC syndrome ranges from medical or supportive care to surgical bypass,3 and it is important for physicians to understand the varied treatment modalities of this potentially life-threatening disease.17 Fortunately, the overwhelming majority of patients with SVC syndrome secondary to benign causes develop a physiologic compensation for the obstruction that can be treated with anticoagulation and endovascular modalities. Intervention for symptomatic relief may not be required.1 An endovascular approach is the current standard of care to relieve SVC obstruction due to malignancy to obtain prompt relief of the rapidly emerging symptoms and improve quality of life,3 keeping in mind the short life expectancy of these patients. The role of endovascular therapy in SVC syndrome of nonmalignant etiology is undecided because the long-term durability of this treatment method remains to be assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This case study will retrospectively review all SVC syndrome and/or occlusion procedures since January 2009. All patients were given adequate informed consent about the procedure and its benefits and complications.

Definitions of clinical outcomes will adhere to the Subcommittee on Reporting Standards in Venous disease.27 Risk factors and outcomes of these procedures will be retrospectively analyzed. Data collected included preoperative patient demographics, clinical status, noninvasive and invasive imaging, operative procedural details, post-operative complications, post-procedural imaging surveillance, adjunctive/re-intervention procedures, clinical outcome during follow-up, and mortality. Primary endpoints will be clinical outcome and patency. Secondary endpoints will be re-intervention rate and death within 30 days.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75203
        • Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent SVC bypass procedures from January 2010 to June 2013 at Methodist Dallas Medical Center will be screened for participation in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presence of SVC syndrome or SVC occlusion
  • Presence of ESRD on hemodialysis
  • Presence of upper extremity or neck access, either catheter or surgical fistula
  • Patients who have received endovenous or open bypass reconstruction of the SVC secondary to SVC syndrome or SVC occlusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have not undergone endovenous or open bypass reconstruction of the SVC secondary to SVC syndrome or SVC occlusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcome and patency
Time Frame: Upto 30 days
To report findings in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis who underwent SVC reconstruction
Upto 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Feldtman, M.D., The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 13, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2013.00.642.A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Superior Vena Cava Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Superior vena cava reconstruction

Subscribe