Fluorescence Molecular Endoscopy and Molecular Fluorescence-guided Surgery in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TRACT-II)

April 14, 2024 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

Fluorescence Molecular Endoscopy and Molecular Fluorescence-guided Surgery of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Cetuximab-IRDye800CW: a Single-center Feasibility and Safety Study

Treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is multidisciplinary and consists of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgical removal of the rectal tumor and potentially tumor positive lymph nodes.

  1. After surgery, in 15 to 27% of patients that received nCRT no tumor cells can be detected during histopathological examination. In today's clinical practice, all of these patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) are operated upon, with substantial morbidity and mortality. The 5-year survival is 83.3% for patients with a pCR, and 65.6% for those without pCR. Response after nCRT is currently evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, as MRI cannot differentiate between molecular characteristics of tissue, prediction of treatment response can be inaccurate. In patients with a potential cCR on MRI, additionally a high-definition white-light (HD-WL) endoscopy is performed with biopsies of the previous tumor location. If both MRI and HD-WL endoscopy confirm a potential cCR, patients can also be treated with a watch-and-wait approach, including frequent follow-up with HD-WL endoscopy and MRI. This potentially prevents extensive surgical procedures for patients in which this is not required. However, MRI and HD-WL endoscopy often remain insufficient for identification of cCR. Therefore, novel imaging methods are needed for accurate prediction of treatment response in order to select patients. The investigators believe fluorescence molecular endoscopy (FME) could be a promising technique for evaluation of treatment response.
  2. During surgery, tumor-negative resection margins are of great prognostic value. Currently, surgeons rely on visual and tactile inspection for differentiation between malignant and healthy tissue. When in doubt, a frozen section can be obtained, which is time consuming and poses a high risk of sampling error. However, 14.7% of patients still have tumor-positive resection margins, increasing the risk of local recurrence and worsening outcome. Therefore, there is a need for novel imaging techniques that can be used intraoperatively to improve margin assessment. The investigators believe molecular fluorescence-guided surgery (MFGS) could be a promising technique for evaluation of resection margins.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Locally advanced rectal cancer, in multi-disciplinary colorectal oncology meeting agreed on long course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgical removal of the primary tumor;
  • Clinical suspicion of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent;
  • Concurrent uncontrolled medical conditions;
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding. A negative pregnancy test must be available for women of childbearing potential (i.e. premenopausal women with intact reproductive organs and women less than two years after menopause);
  • Received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to the dose of cetuximab- IRDye800CW;
  • History of infusion reactions to cetuximab or other monoclonal antibodies;
  • Had within 6 months prior to enrollment: myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, uncontrolled cardiac heart failure, significant liver disease, unstable angina pectoris;
  • Patients receiving Class IA (quinidine, procainamide) or Class III (dofetilide, amiodarone, sotalol) antiarrhythmic agents;
  • Evidence of QT prolongation on an ECG made within three months prior to inclusion (greater than 440 ms in males or greater than 450 ms in females);
  • Magnesium, potassium and calcium deviations that might lead to cardiac rhythm (grade II or higher deviations by CTCAE), determined within three months prior to inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NIR endoscopy and surgery with cetuximab-IRDye800CW
In this non-randomized, non-blinded, prospective, feasibility study, cetuximab-IRDye800CW will be administered to a total of 15 patients with proven locally advanced rectal cancer
Intravenous administration of a pre-dose of 75 mg unlabeled Cetuximab followed by 15 mg Cetuximab-IRDye800 prior to the study procedures
Other Names:
  • Tracer administration
A flexible fluorescence fiber-bundle is attached to a fluorescence camera platform to enable the detection of fluorescence signals. The fluorescence fiber-probe can be inserted through the standard working channel of the standard clinical endoscope for fluorescent endoscopy. Fluorescence imaging will be performed post the chemoradiotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of molecular fluorescence endoscopy using Cetuximab-800CW
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Number of participants with treatment-related (serious) adverse events
up to 3 months
Safety of molecular fluorescence-guided surgery using Cetuximab-800CW
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Number of participants with treatment-related (serious) adverse events
up to 3 months
Feasibility of molecular fluorescence endoscopy using Cetuximab-800CW
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Feasibility will be evaluated by assessing real-time during endoscopy whether fluorescence can be visualized and by taking images during fluorescence molecular endoscopy. Thereafter the fluorescence intensity using the raw data will be measured and a tumor-to-background ratio will be calculated.
up to 3 months
Feasibility of molecular fluorescence-guided surgery using Cetuximab-800CW
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Feasibility will be evaluated by assessing whether fluorescence can be detected in the resection margins and on the specimen. Thereafter the fluorescence intensity using the raw data will be measured and a tumor-to-background ratio will be calculated.
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantifcation of the fluorescent signals
Time Frame: up to 3 months
To quantify fluorescence signals in vivo and ex vivo using multi-diameter single-fiber reflectance, single-fiber fluorescence (MDSFR/SFF) spectroscopy measurements
up to 3 months
Correlation of the fluorescent signal to histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Time Frame: up to 3 months
To correlate and validate fluorescence signals detected in vivo with ex vivo histopathology and immunohistochemistry
up to 3 months
Evaluation of the distribution of Cetuximab-IRDye800CW
Time Frame: up to 3 months
To evaluate the distribution of cetuximab-IRDye800CW on a microscopic level using fluorescence microscopy
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cetuximab-IRDye800

Subscribe