- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04643210
Management of my Bipolarity Intervention in Bipolar Disorder Patients (MoB)
The Management of My Bipolarity Intervention on the Combined Use of Technology and Face to Face Education on the Empowerment of Ill Health Self-management Skills in Adults With a Bipolar Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of the study is to develop and test an educational intervention for patients with bipolar disorder (BD). The objectives include:
- A literature review on BD educational programs.
- Exploration of the educational needs of adults with BD.
- Development of the MoB educational intervention (MoB EI), encompassing a face to face (F2F) intervention and a technology-based intervention via a Digital platform (MoB DP).
- Exploration of the effectiveness of the MoB EI in BD patients regarding i) their knowledge on BD, and ii) empowerment of ill health self-management skills in relation to the improvement of impulse control, adherence to pharmacotherapy, relapse frequency, quality of life and adaptive attitudes towards substance use.
Design This study uses a mixed-method design and consists of four stages.
Stage 1: (a) To conduct a literature review on BD educational programs, and (b) define the educational needs of adults with BD via empirical exploration of their living experience (a focus group and content analysis will be implemented for this qualitative assessment), aiming to integrate both data in the MoB EI.
Stage 2: Design of the MoB F2F EI & the MoB Digital Platform (MoB DP). ΜoΒ F2F EI:The design of this intervention will rely on the Colom & Vieta model, Cognitive- Behavioural techniques and the results of the 1st stage (all relevant literature and data acquired in the qualitative research of educational needs). A textbook will be devised explaining in detail the step-by-step process and the techniques of the experimental educational method of the MoB F2F EI.
MoB DP: The structure of the MoB DP has been designed by the researchers of the present study and a web developer, partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in Stage 1); its goal is to create an ecosystem where people with BD will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile. The MoB DP will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information. A responsive design has been applied, i.e. accessible by all types of devices. The platform is accessible to the participants in the current study, as well as to any interested person, e.g., family members of people with BP, or care givers providing updated information related to BD (platform users). The platform administrator is the main researcher (AH), while the owner is the Nursing Department of the Cyprus University of Technology (CUT). The participants of the proposed study will have the opportunity to access the platform both during and after the completion of the study.
The informative part of the platform is live (www.mob.com.cy), while the interactive part is under development. The informative part, so far, includes the following functionalities: self-management action plan, home-work exercises, self-assessment tools, scientific articles relevant to BD. Entry into the platform functionalities (scientific articles excluded) is password protected.
Specifically, the users of the platform will have the opportunity to register by filling in their personal profile and revisit when they wish. Regarding self-management functionalities, the platform will contain subject units where personal relapse symptoms may be registered, a life events table, personal risk factors for relapse and a weekly program of activities. Input of relevant information will be through open-ended questions and check lists. Participants of the MoB F2F EI who visit the platform, will find that these subject units (chapters) are topics on which they will be educated on. Additional features will be incorporated according to development of 1st stage, e.g., new training needs, as described by participants in the focus groups.
Another subject unit will be the personal therapy file, where users will have the chance to keep tabulated notes related to their therapy, including information about the dose and type of medication treatment, as well as pending medical test, e.g., blood test, and other relevant information. The therapeutic team of the user will have the possibility to register in the platform under the approval of the user with the aim to support continuity and sharing of information.
Stage 3: Implementation and evaluation of the effectiveness of the MoB EI. All eligible participants will be assigned into the intervention group and the control group. Based on power analysis the intervention group will be constituted of 40 participants and the control (waiting) group of 40 participants.
The criteria for discontinuing participation in intervention group are disorder relapse and non-adherence to pharmacotherapy (discontinuation of medication).
Intervention description. The intervention group will receive the MoB F2F EI on group or personal form according to the participant's choice. Also the participants of the intervention group will have access to the MoB DP.
The implementation methodology of the MoB F2F EI will include videos and power point presentations, as well as interactive learning methods such as role-playing, empowerment exercises, live discussions.
The MoB F2F EI will comprise a total of 12 educational F2F sessions. Each session will have a duration of 1.5 hours and the maximum number of participants in the groups will be 12 patients. At the beginning of each session, the participants will be given the opportunity to record their feedback for the previous session and the impact of the training program, so far, on them and their families / significant others. The location where the MoB F2F EI will be conducted is the CUT. The main researcher (AH) will implement the MoB F2F EI. Participation in the educational intervention is free of charge. Also, no economic outcomes are expected to emerge through this or any stage of the study.
Those who will wish to withdraw before completion of the intervention, will be able to continue to receive information/knowledge about their illness through the digital platform.
The control group will have access only to the MoB DP.
Effectiveness evaluation. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the MoB F2F EI will be based on the degree of improvement on the following parameters:
- Self-perceived quality of life level
- Ability to control impulses
- Psychoactive substances use attitudes
- Adherence to pharmacotherapy
- Frequency of relapses
- BD Knowledge level
There will be four evaluation timepoints. The 1st evaluation timepoint will be prior to the implementation of the MoB F2F EI, the 2nd will take place immediately after the completion of the MoB F2F EI, while the 3rd and 4th ones will be applied six and twelve months, respectively, after the completion of the MoB EI. These timepoints have been determined according to relevant literature.
The control group will be assessed via the same evaluation tools as the intervention group, and at the same time periods.
This will verify the hypothesis that patients who receive only pharmacotherapy and have access to the MoB DP do not have the same improvement as intervention group in important aspects of their lives, i.e., quality of life, cognitive functioning, impulse control, adherence to pharmacotherapy, relapse prevention.
Data analysis. Mean and standard deviation will be assessed for the scale numeric scores (WHOQOL, DUDIT, MoCa, DAI-30, relapse frequency) and frequencies will be tested for categorical variables (gender, age groups, group years in illness). Parametric tests (ANOVA, t-test) will be applied for comparisons between groups. For all statistical tests, p values of 0.05 or lower will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analysed through the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL version 25.00). To test the relationship between two or more variables logistic and linear regression analysis will be used. Regarding missing data, multiple imputation method will be applied.
Stage 4: Assessment of the applicability of the Digital platform. The assessment of the applicability of the digital platform will be based on qualitative (users' feedback) and quantitative testing (data analysis). Regarding users' qualitative feedback, there will be an exploration of the experience of the users with the platform and the degree to which they were positively affected by its use. This process will take place via focus groups discussions. The focus of the interviews will be on the impact of the platform on their everyday life, as well as on enhancement of ill health self-management skills. It is intended to deliver 2 focus groups with 8-12 participants each. The participants will be among those who (a) attended the F2F EI and at the same time had used the platform, (b) only had access to the MoB DP.
The evaluation of the platform will also take place through anonymous questionnaires by asking the users of the platform to answer predefined questions regarding satisfaction parameters relevant to the platform. The technology which will be applied for this process is Google Forms. This part of the assessment is expected to take place during the second half of 2021.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Limassol, Cyprus, 3041
- Cyprus University of Technology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis based on DSM-5 for BD type I and II.
- Age between 18 and 65.
- Signed informed consent.
- Stabilized mood status at the beginning of the MoB F2F intervention based on clinical assessment, conducted by the primary investigator (AH).
- Experience of the illness of at least one year based on reported medical record.
- Adequate awareness of the illness, based on the following guide: (a) are you aware of the reason(s) you are using mental health services/ under medication? and (b) are you aware of the aim of the educational intervention in which you may participate?
Exclusion criteria:
- Intellectual disability (IQ<70), based on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS).
- Brain damage (e.g, following a stroke), based on diagnostic tests.
- Acute phase of the illness which requires hospitalization.
- Acute phase of the illness, based on clinical assessment, as well as the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and/or Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) tools.
- Substance use problems at the beginning of this stage according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) tools.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: F2F MoB EI and access to MoB Digital Platform (MoB DP) group
The design of the face-to-face Management of my Bipolarity educational intervention (F2F MoB EI) will rely on the Colom & Vieta model, Cognitive- Behavioural techniques and the results of the relevant literature review and data acquired in the qualitative research of bipolar disease patients' educational needs. A textbook will be devised explaining in detail the step-by-step process and the techniques of the experimental educational method of the MoB F2F EI. This group will also receive the technology-based intervetion, which regards access to the MoB DP. This is an ecosystem where the participants will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile. |
The MoB F2F EI will comprise a total of 12 educational F2F sessions. Each session will have a duration of 1.5 hours and the maximum number of participants in the groups will be 12 patients. The intervention group will receive the MoB F2F EI on group or personal form according to the participant's choice. The implementation methodology of the MoB F2F EI will include videos and power point presentations, as well as interactive learning methods such as role-playing, empowerment exercises, live discussions.
This is a technology-based intervention, which regards access to a dfigital platform, the MoB DP.
The structure of the Digital platform has been partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in the qualitative part of the study) and its goal is to create an ecosystem where users will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile.
The Digital platform will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information.
|
Active Comparator: The MoB DP group
This group will receive the technology-based intervention, which regards access to the MoB DP.
The structure of the MoB DP has been partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in the qualitative part of the study) and its goal is to create an ecosystem where users will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile.
The Digital platform will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information.
|
This is a technology-based intervention, which regards access to a dfigital platform, the MoB DP.
The structure of the Digital platform has been partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in the qualitative part of the study) and its goal is to create an ecosystem where users will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile.
The Digital platform will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Bipolar disease patients educational needs
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Qualitative measures: 1. Knowledge/ mental health literacy on present medical condition (measurement tool [MT]/ Open-ended question: Please tell us, what do you know about your mental health condition/ BD?) 2. Knowledge gap regarding BD (MT/ Open ended question: Please describe what you would like to know about bipolar disorders). 3. Topics to be covered (MT/ Open ended question: Please describe in what way/topics you would like to be educated on bipolar disorders/to increase your knowledge about bipolar disorders? 4. Educational and feasibility expectations (MT/ Open-ended questions: a. Please describe your expectations from an educational program regarding the impact on your everyday living b. How you would like this program to be implemented one on one or in a group? C. How long would you like the program to last? 5. e-Health literacy (MT/ Open ended question: What is your level of engagement with the Internet?) |
6 months
|
Degree of self-perceived quality of life as measured by the total score in the scale "World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment".
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The scale "World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment" is a 1-5 Likert type scale including 26 items. The minimum score in the scale is 26 and the maximun is 130. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. |
18 months
|
Level of knowledge regarding BD, as measured by the total score in the scale "Bipolar Disorder Knowledge Scale".
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The "Bipolar Disorder Knowledge Scale" is a 25-item true-false scale.
The scale assesses knowledge of BD with items targeting diagnosis, etiology, disease course, symptoms, treatment, and life impact.
The ration of "true" to "false" responses is assessed.
Higher percentage values indicate a better outcome.
|
18 months
|
Degree of ability to control impulses, as measured by the total score in the scale "YOUNG MANIA RATING SCALE " (YMRS) .
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The "YMRS" is a 0-4 likert scale, including 11 items.
The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 44.
The lower the total score the better the outcome.
|
18 months
|
Degree of adherence to pharmacotherapy, as measured by the total score in the scale "Drug Attitude Inventory" (DAI).
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The "DAI" is a 30 item "true-false" scale.The ration of "true" to "false" responses is assessed.
Higher percentage values indicate a better outcome.
|
18 months
|
Degree of dysfunctional attitudes towards substance use as measured by the total score in the scale "Drug Use Disorders Identification Test" (DUDIT).
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The scale DUDIT is a 1-5 Likert, 11-item scale (scale total score range: 1-55) . The lower the total score the better the outcome. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. |
18 months
|
Degree of dysfunctional attitudes towards alcohol as measured by the total score in the scale "Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test" (AUDIT).
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The AUDIT scale is a 0-4 Likert, 10-item scale (scale total score range: 0-40) . Lower scores indicate a better outcome. |
18 months
|
Frequency of relapses, as measured by the number of hospitalizations after the completion of the face to face intervention.
Time Frame: Two years following the end of the face tot face educational intervention.
|
The number of hospitalizations will be measured as the sum of the individual hospitalizations in a high security psychaitric hospital. The lower the number of the frequency the better the outcome. |
Two years following the end of the face tot face educational intervention.
|
Reduced duration of relapses, as measured by the duration of inpatient hospitalizations in days after the completion of the face to face intervention.
Time Frame: Two years following the end of the face to face educational intervention.
|
The duration of inpatient hospitalizations will be measured as the sum of the days of hospitalization in high security psychaitric hospitals. The lower the duration in days of the hospitalization the better the outcome. |
Two years following the end of the face to face educational intervention.
|
Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, as measured by users' qualitative feedback on the following open-ended question: "Please tell us, what was your experience with the MoB DP use?
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The more positive the described experience the better the outcome.
|
6 months
|
Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, as measured by the users' qualitative feedback on the impact of the MoB DP on their life based on the following open-ended question: "Please tell us, what was the impact of the MoB DP use on your life?"
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The more positive the described impact of the MoB DP on users' life the better the outcome.
|
6 months
|
Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, measured by users' feedback on the impact of the platform on their self-management skills based on the question "What was the impact of the platform on your ill health self-management skills?"
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The more positive the described impact of the digital platform on users' ill health self-management skills the better the outcome.
|
6 months
|
Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, as measured by users' self-reported degree of satisfaction on MoB DP by the total score on the scale "Users' Satisfaction Scale" (USS).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The USS is 1-3 Likert scale (low;moderate/accepted; high), which includes 6 items, assessing users' perceptions about overall experienced satisfaction (item1); utility according to their present medical condition (item 2); feasibility on daily usage (item 3); technical difficulties experienced (item 4); improvement of BD self-management skills (item 5); improvement of BD knowledge (item 6). The total score of the USS ranges between 6- 18. The higher the total score the better the outcome. |
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Description of the topics of the MoB educational intervention through a qualitative measure.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measurement tool: Open-ended question "Please describe on which topics you would like to be aducated or increase your knowledge on BD with focus on therapeutic issues, pathophysiology, well-being and patients' rights."
|
6 months
|
Description of the mode of the MoB educational intervention through a qualitative measure.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measurement tool: Open-ended question "Please describe the mode through which you would like to recieve information with special focus on the duration, number of sessions and duration of each session of the intervention"
|
6 months
|
Description of the different modes of the MoB educational intervention through a qualitative measure.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measurement tool: Open-ended question "Please describe the mode through which you would like to recieve information with focus on personal or group sessions, face-to-face or via internet sessions "
|
6 months
|
Description of the MoB DP technology-based intervention through a qualitative measure.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measurement tool: Open-ended question "What is your preferences regarding a technology-based educational intervention on BD with focus on the topics to be included, on the information provision mode (interactive or not), and access modes (tablet, mobile, personal computer)?"
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Maria NK Karanikola, Cyprus University of Technology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- 21. Hatzioannou A, Papastavrou E, Chatzittofis A, Karanikola M. Exploration of the effectiveness of structured education in empowering people with Bipolar Disorder. Nursing Care & Research 2020;55:246-274.
- Hatzioannou A, Chatzittofis A, Koutroubas VS, Papastavrou E, Karanikola M. Combined Use of Web-Based and In-Person Education on Ill Health Self-management Skills in Adults With Bipolar Disorder: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 8;10(9):e25168. doi: 10.2196/25168. Erratum In: JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 15;10(9):e33506.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5.34.01.7.6Ε/0490/2018
- EEBK/EΠ/2018/27 (Other Identifier: CYPRUS NATIONAL BIOETHICS COMMITTEE)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder
-
ProgenaBiomeRecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Type I Disorder | Bipolar Disorder Mild | Bipolar Disorder Moderate | Bipolar Disorder SevereUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterThe Ryan Licht Sang Bipolar FoundationCompletedBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar Disorder I | Bipolar Affective DisorderUnited States
-
University of PittsburghNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionCompletedBipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Disorder NOSUnited States
-
Region StockholmKarolinska InstitutetRecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Affective Disorder; Remission in | Bipolar Affective Disorder, Currently Depressed, ModerateSweden
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Hospital Moinhos de VentoActive, not recruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Major Depressive Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Affective Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderBrazil
-
Medical University of South CarolinaMilken InstituteCompletedBipolar Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedMajor Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I and Bipolar IIUnited States
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceUnknownBipolar Disorder I | Bipolar Disorder II | Rapid Cycling Bipolar Disorder(DSM-IV-TR)France
-
Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.University of MinnesotaCompletedMajor Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I and Bipolar IIUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity Health Network, TorontoNot yet recruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Treatment- Resistant Bipolar Disorder | Type 2 Bipolar DisorderCanada
Clinical Trials on F2F MoB EI
-
The University of Hong KongChinese University of Hong Kong; University College, London; London School of... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Rockfield Medical DevicesHorizon 2020 - European CommissionEnrolling by invitationEnteral FeedingUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
Elixiron Immunotherapeutics Inc.ParexelCompletedHealthy VolunteersUnited States
-
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesCompletedEmotional IntelligenceIran, Islamic Republic of
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterCompletedPreterm BirthUnited States
-
University of ArizonaCompleted
-
Winthrop University HospitalWithdrawn
-
University of MichiganAmerican Academy of Sleep MedicineCompleted
-
Walsh UniversityCompleted