The Effect of Emotional Intelligence in Reducing Job Stress (EI)

August 18, 2021 updated by: Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

The Effect of Training on the Promotion of Emotional Intelligence and Its Indirect Role in Reducing Job Stress in the Emergency Department

Abstract Background: Emergency Medicine Wards (EMWs) are among the most stressful wards of hospitals. Emotional Intelligence (EI) seems to be one of the factors that can aid individuals in overcoming environmental stresses. Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the role of training in improving EI skills and addressing its indirect effect on reducing job stress of emergency medical assistants in the emergency department.

Materials and Methods: In the present study, 20 emergency medical assistants were trained in EI skills while 22 assistants received no training. Then, all participants' EI level and job stress were assessed and compared before and after the intervention using the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory(EQ-i) and the Osipow job stress questionnaire, respectively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Individuals in the control group did not receive any training while individuals in the intervention group received the pertinent training. The duration of the training for the intervention group was 16 hours (four four-hour sessions). The whole training process lasted for one month. EI training sessions were held and managed by two experienced instructors selected from medical education specialists with sufficient experience in conducting EI training. Both instructors attended the sessions, presented the content, videos, slides, and brochures with the help of each other, and managed related scenarios in each session.

It should be noted that the instructors as well as the participants had no information about the initial scores of EI and job stress recorded before the training intervention.

At the beginning of the first session, the basic definitions and concepts of EI were discussed, and the common environmental stressors were described from the perspective of emergency medical assistants. Moreover, a succinct description of the benefits of EI training and practice was provided. After the initial introduction, a number of EI skills were taught in each session by presenting videos, slides, and brochures. Then, participants were engaged in discussions by presenting scenarios related to EI skills in the concluding hours of each session to offer more content load. These scenarios recounted the situation of an individual facing a problem and encompassed a list of suggested reactions including the reasons behind each reaction that an observer was supposed to indicate. Scenarios were generally implemented in smaller groups in such a way that some scenarios were distributed and discussed among all participants. The assistants were questioned about identifying the source of the concern, the cause of the concern, potential environmental factors, and how a personal perspective affects their response to the situation. Other scenarios were distributed among the smaller groups and discussed by each groups' representative. Each group presented their analysis and argumentation of the scenario, and then the relevant questions were answered by providing the reasons. The sessions ended with the instructor summarizing different opinions on each of the scenarios (19).

It should be mentioned that to prevent fatigue and obtain better efficiency, participants (emergency medical assistants) were served twice during each session. Moreover, considering the possibility of the interference of emergency medical assistants' work shifts, it was planned in coordination with the Deputy Minister of Education that the emergency medical assistants would not have any work shifts and would not even be on duty over the four days of training.

Outcomes At the end of the last training session, two questionnaires of EQ-I and Osipow were filled out by the participants of the intervention group. In addition, the participants of the control group were contacted and asked to fill out these two questionnaires by visiting them in person (on the last day of the training session related to the intervention group). If the participant in the control group did not meet the conditions for the face-to-face visit, the questions were read to them on the phone and their choice was recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency Medicine Residents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refraining to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EI skills training
Individuals in the intervention group received the pertinent training. The duration of the training for the intervention group was 16 hours (four four-hour sessions). The whole training process lasted for one month. EI training sessions were held and managed by two experienced instructors selected from medical education specialists with sufficient experience in conducting EI training. Both instructors attended the sessions, presented the content, videos, slides, and brochures with the help of each other, and managed related scenarios in each session.
EI training sessions were held and managed by two experienced instructors selected from medical education specialists with sufficient experience in conducting EI training. Both instructors attended the sessions, presented the content, videos, slides, and brochures with the help of each other, and managed related scenarios in each session.
No Intervention: Control
Individuals in the control group did not receive any training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EQ-I Bar-On Questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
The EQ-I was first developed by Bar-On in 1980 and consists of 90 items, each of which is answered based on a 5-point Likert scale from 5: strongly agree to 1: strongly disagree
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Osipow job stress Questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
The Osipow job stress questionnaire was first developed by Osipow and Spokane in 1987 and consists of 60 items, each of which is answered based on a 5-point Likert scale from 4: most of the time to 0: never.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 960235

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotional Intelligence

Clinical Trials on EI skills training

Subscribe