Diet and Immune Effects Trial: DIET- A Randomized Double Blinded Dietary Intervention Study in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy (DIET)

January 28, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
This is a randomized, double-blind, fully controlled feeding study that will enroll melanoma patients starting standard-of-care ICB in three settings: adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and unresectable. Patients are randomized to the high fiber or healthy control diet. The goal of the study is to establish the effects of dietary intervention on the structure and function of the gut microbiome in patients with melanoma treated with SOC immunotherapies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

To establish the effects of dietary intervention on the structure and function of the gut microbiome.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Assess the effects of dietary intervention on gut metabolic output and systemic metabolism.
  2. Assess the effects of dietary intervention on systemic and tumor immunity
  3. Determine the safety (AEs) and tolerability (GSRS-IBS) of the dietary intervention
  4. Assess the rate of immune related adverse events in patients on immunotherapy receiving dietary interventions
  5. Determine the maximum daily fiber content that 70% of participants are able to tolerate
  6. Assess the adherence to the dietary interventions as defined by 70% of calories consumed over the duration of the study being derived from provided diets (as measured by food records)
  7. Assess the effects of dietary interventions on quality of life and other patient reported outcomes (PROs)

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Assess the association of dietary interventions with clinical outcomes (objective response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS] rate in unresectable cohort and recurrence rate [RR] in adjuvant cohort).
  2. Explore predictors of biological response to dietary interventions.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I (ISOCALORIC HIGH-FIBER DIET): Patients receive a whole foods diet that follows the recommended American Cancer Society guidelines but is higher in fiber for 11 weeks.

ARM II (ISOCALORIC CONTROL DIET): Patients receive a standard whole foods diet of recommended by the American Cancer Society for 11 weeks.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 12 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old.
  2. Body mass index (BMI) 18.5-40 kg/m^2
  3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  4. English-speaking
  5. Self-reported willingness to exclusively eat the provided diets
  6. Self-reported willingness to comply with scheduled visits, undergo venipuncture, and provide stool samples
  7. Cohort-specific:

    • 1 Adjuvant Melanoma: i. Resected Stage II-IV melanoma with planned initiation of adjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 or anti-LAG3
    • 2 Unresectable Melanoma: i. Histologically confirmed unresectable stage III or Stage IV melanoma with planned initiation of standard of care anti-PD1 +/- CTLA4 or anti-PD1 +/- LAG3 immunotherapy and no prior immunotherapy in the metastatic setting.
    • 3 Neoadjuvant Melanoma: i. Histologically confirmed stage III/IV melanoma with planned initiation of neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 or anti-LAG3 1. Participants must have archival tissue block available or be willing to undergo a newly-obtained core needle or incisional biopsy at baseline. Fine needle aspiration is not acceptable.
    • 4 Unresectable RCC: i. Unresectable clear-cell renal cell carcinoma with planned initiation of standard of care anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of >= grade II colitis or diarrhea on immunotherapy or any ongoing colitis or diarrhea of any grade
  2. Unresolved >= grade III immune-related adverse event on immunotherapy (other than endocrinopathy requiring hormone replacement)
  3. History of active inflammatory bowel disease or major gastrointestinal surgery (not including appendectomy or cholecystectomy) within 3 months of enrollment or any history of total colectomy, or bariatric surgery (bariatric surgery which does not disrupt the gastrointestinal lumen, i.e. restrictive procedures such as banding, are permitted).
  4. Medical contraindications to intervention diet as determined by the treating physician
  5. Self-reported major dietary restrictions related to the intervention
  6. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type I or type II that requires medical treatment or random glucose > 200 mg/dL
  7. Antibiotic use within 21 days of planned start of equilibration diet (self-reported and/or noted by the treating physician)
  8. Has a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of study intervention administration. Inhaled or topical steroids, and adrenal replacement doses > 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease
  9. Regularly taking probiotics, fiber supplements, or any other medication or supplement that could affect study outcome as determined by the principal investigator and unable/unwilling to discontinue for the purpose of the study. These agents must be discontinued at least 14 days prior to start of diet
  10. Currently consuming an average estimated daily fiber intake exceeding 20 grams based on the results of the preliminary dietary assessment; vegetarian or vegan
  11. Current smoker or heavy drinker (defined as > 14 drinks per week) or current self reported illicit drug use
  12. Uncontrolled concurrent illness or infection or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  13. Unable or unwilling to undergo study procedures
  14. Plan for travel during the study that would preclude adherence to prescribed diets
  15. Cognitively impaired adults

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (isocaloric high-fiber diet)
Patients receive a whole foods diet that follows the recommended American Cancer Society guidelines but is higher in fiber for 11 weeks.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Consume isocaloric whole foods diet higher in fiber
Other Names:
  • Dietary Modification
  • intervention, dietary
  • Nutrition Intervention
  • Nutrition Interventions
  • Nutritional Interventions
Whole foods diet
Other Names:
  • Dietary Modification
  • intervention, dietary
  • Nutrition Intervention
  • Nutrition Interventions
  • Nutritional Interventions
Active Comparator: Arm II (isocaloric diet)
Patients receive a standard whole foods diet recommended by the American Cancer Society for 11 weeks.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Consume isocaloric whole foods diet higher in fiber
Other Names:
  • Dietary Modification
  • intervention, dietary
  • Nutrition Intervention
  • Nutrition Interventions
  • Nutritional Interventions
Whole foods diet
Other Names:
  • Dietary Modification
  • intervention, dietary
  • Nutrition Intervention
  • Nutrition Interventions
  • Nutritional Interventions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the gut microbiome
Time Frame: Baseline up to 11 weeks
Changes of alpha-diversity (e.g., Shannon index) and abundance/relative abundance of different taxon levels (e.g., genus, family), from baseline to end of intervention, will be estimated. The outcomes will be compared. between two arms using t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Linear mixed effects models will be used for assessing the longitudinal data. Similarity in microbiome community structure will be assessed using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and compared using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
Baseline up to 11 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in systemic and tumor immunity
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Percent change in CD8 T cells using flow cytometry will be compared between two arms using t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient will be used to assess the correlation between the outcome at baseline and end of intervention.
Up to 12 weeks
Change in metabolic profile
Time Frame: Baseline up to 11 weeks
Change in relative concentration (ion intensity determined as area under the curve) measured by mass spectrometry-based analysis of blood and fecal specimens from baseline to end of intervention will be compared between two arms using t-test or Mann-Whitney test.
Baseline up to 11 weeks
Change in quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 11 weeks
Change in quality of life between baseline and end of intervention using a validated, 30 question scoring instrument (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Each question is scored in from 1 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much") in a Likert format. Linear mixed effects models will be used for assessing the longitudinal data. Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient will be used to assess the correlation between measures for quality of life at baseline and end of intervention.
Baseline up to 11 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
AEs attributed to diet as well as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) attributed to immunotherapy will be assessed using frequency counts and percentages.
Up to 12 weeks
Symptom profile
Time Frame: Up to 12-week follow-up
To assess gastrointestinal symptoms related to the dietary interventions, the GSRS-IBS will be used. The GSRS-IBS is a 13-item validated instrument with subscales for each item ranging from 0 ("no discomfort at all") to 7 ("very severe discomfort"). The gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS-IBS) will be summarized using frequency counts and percentages.
Up to 12-week follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate (ORR) (unresectable cohort)
Time Frame: At 12-week follow-up
Response will be assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The ORR will be estimated along with 95% confidence interval, and compared between two diet groups using Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate.
At 12-week follow-up
Progression-free survival (PFS) (unresectable cohort)
Time Frame: Up to 12-week follow-up
Response will be assessed by RECIST 1.1. PFS will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between two diet groups using log-rank test.
Up to 12-week follow-up
Recurrence rate (RR) (adjuvant cohort)
Time Frame: Up to 12-week follow-up
Response will be assessed by RECIST 1.1. The RR will be estimated along with 95% confidence interval, and compared between two diet groups using Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate.
Up to 12-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erez Baruch, MD,PHD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Melanoma

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

Subscribe