Depth of Maximal Ileal Insertion During Retrograde Enteroscopy With TTS Balloon (NaviAid2)

June 13, 2025 updated by: Marc Zuckerman, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Depth of Maximal Insertion During Retrograde Enteroscopy Using Colonoscopy With Through-the-scope Balloon Enteroscopy (NaviAid) Compared With Using the Standard Colonoscope Alone

Diagnostic modalities for the evaluation of small bowel pathology include video capsule endoscopy (VCE), antegrade and retrograde device-assisted enteroscopy, CT and MR enterography (1). Despite VCE being the first-line evaluation modality, it lacks interventional capability. Deep enteroscopy (DE) allows tissue sampling and other therapeutic interventions with real-time endoscopic assessment. DE is usually performed with specific endoscopes (balloon-assisted device or spiral overtube) making it time consuming and there is limited availability since special instruments and accessories are required.(1,2) The through-the-scope (TTS) balloon system consists of a balloon catheter designed for anchoring in the small bowel, inserted through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope.(3) The catheter is advanced, the balloon is inflated and anchored in the small intestine and the endoscope slides over the guiding catheter to the inflated balloon. The most common indications for DE are obscure GI bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, abnormal capsule endoscopy and chronic diarrhea. As compared to spiral, single-or double-balloon enteroscopy, TTS (NaviAid, SMART Medical Systems Ltd, Ra'anana, Israel) is a simpler technique, which requires less investment in infrastructure. The balloon catheter is advanced blindly in front of a standard adult colonoscope as it bends around the curves of the small bowel. To prevent perforation/trauma the catheter is fitted with a soft silicone tip which easily bends under pressure.

Insertion depth can be calculated during the withdrawal of the enteroscope. The Aim of the study: To compare the depth of maximal ileal insertion between through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) with enteroscopy using the adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone, in the same patient, in a prospective cohort at University Medical Center of El Paso, Texas.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Aim of the study: To compare the depth of maximal ileal insertion between through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) with enteroscopy using the adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone, in the same patient, in a prospective cohort from August 1, 2020 to July 31, 2023 at University Medical Center of El Paso, Texas.

Depth of insertion is correlated with diagnostic yield, meaning that we would like to ascertain if the use of the colonoscope with NaviAid will result in greater depth of insertion and potentially more findings of small bowel abnormalities than using a colonoscope alone.

It is assumed that this is the case, but we want to show it and quantify it.

HYPOTHESIS:

The depth of ileal insertion is greater with the use of through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) when compared with enteroscopy using the standard adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the depth of maximal ileal insertion between through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) with the adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone, in the same patient, in a prospective cohort at University Medical Center of El Paso, Texas.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79905
        • Recruiting
        • Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marc Zuckerman, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Luis Chavez, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sherif Elhanafi, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients referred for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding with nondiagnostic upper and lower endoscopy with suspicion of distal small bowel source based on either abnormal videocapsule endoscopy or imaging study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Sign Informed Consent Form
  2. Patients age between 18-90 years
  3. Patients in which retrograde enteroscopy is indicated for any of the following:

abnormal video capsule endoscopy non-diagnostic upper and lower endoscopy obscure gastrointestinal bleeding iron deficiency anemia non-diagnostic upper endoscopy and abnormal CT Hemodynamically stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to sign Informed Consent Form
  2. Pregnancy and breast feeding
  3. Prior colon resection
  4. Patients with known strictures
  5. Patients with altered anatomy
  6. Inadequate bowel preparation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
depth of maximal insertion into ileum
Time Frame: during the enteroscopy of the patient, about one hour
depth of insertion is measured on withdrawal of colonoscope by estimating in 10 cm intervals
during the enteroscopy of the patient, about one hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
diagnostic yield of retrograde enteroscopy
Time Frame: during the enteroscopy of the patient, bout one hour
proportion of studies with significant findings on enterosocpy
during the enteroscopy of the patient, bout one hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc J Zuckerman, MD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia, Iron Deficiency

Subscribe