Study of MRgFUS Exablate Treatment Following the Neuropathic Pain

November 25, 2020 updated by: InSightec

A Post Market Study of Exablate Model 4000 Type 1.0/1.1 Following the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain

The objective of this study is to capture the change in pain intensity, physical/emotional function, and pain impact for patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain who undergo an Exablate treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objectives of this study are to capture the change in pain intensity, physical/emotional function, and pain impact for patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain who undergo an Exablate treatment and to capture safety data of the procedure.

The safety assessment measure is the incidence and frequency of device and procedure related Adverse Events (AEs) in subjects who undergo an Exablate treatment.

Performance will be measure by assessing the change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for pain intensity defined as a decrease of at least 30% of pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Assessing the change from baseline to 6-12 months post Exablate treatment for pain intensity assessed by using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women age 30 years or older
  • Subject has diagnosis of "definite" neuropathic pain (grading system IASP-NeupSIG)
  • Patient has a score of 6 or higher on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
  • Evidence that the subject has tried and failed at least three documented medically supervised treatments (including, but not limited to physical therapy, acupuncture, etc.) and has failed medication treatment from at least two different medication classes
  • Evidence that the subject's pain-related medication regimen is stable 4 weeks prior to the baseline evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject diagnosed with a nociceptive chronic pain syndrome
  • Subject does not agree to participate or is unlikely to participate for the entirety of the study
  • Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: ExAblate 4000 System
Exablate treatment on Neuropathic Pain
Ablation
Other Names:
  • MRgFUS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance Assessment-Pain Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessing the change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for pain intensity defined as a decrease of at least 30% of pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain. The questionnaire with higher score indicates a higher pain level.
3 months
Performance Assessment-Pain Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Assessing the change from baseline to 6-12 months post Exablate treatment for pain intensity assessed by using the pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain. The questionnaire with higher score indicates a higher pain level.
6-12 months
Pain Disability Index
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for Physical Function/Disability measured using the Pain Disability Index (PDI). On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no disability at all and 10 being the worst disability. The questionnaire evaluates the degree to which aspects of a patient's life are disrupted by pain.
3, 6, 12 Months
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for Emotional Function/Catastrophizing measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). On a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 being not at all 4 being all the time. PCS questionnaire is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain).
3, 6, 12 Months
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for Emotional Function/Depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The assessment for detecting and intensity of depression and monitoring change over time after exablate treatment.
3, 6, 12 Months
PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for Impact of Pain/General Quality of Life measured using the PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. PROMIS Global Health is a self-reported questionnaire to assess an individual's physical, mental, and social health.
3, 6, 12 Months
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline to 3 months post Exablate treatment for Impact of Pain/Sleep using the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being very good and 5 very poor. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance is a validated, self-reported questionnaire to assess perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep.
3, 6, 12 Months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 0 to 12 months
Incidence and frequency of device and procedure related Adverse Events (AEs) in subjects who undergo an Exablate treatment
0 to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative Sensory Testing
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline of Quantitative Sensory Testing. The Quantitative Sensory Testing analyses perception in response to external stimuli of controlled intensity, such as cold, heat and mechanical pain thresholds.
3, 6, 12 Months
Laser Evoked Potentials
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline of Laser Evoked Potentials. Laser Evoked Potentials are neurophysiological methods used to evaluate the functions of small fiber sensory pathways by using laser thermal, nociceptive stimuli.
3, 6, 12 Months
Pain Location
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline of Pain Location Map. Pain Location is assessed using a map of the body that is labelled with different numbered quadrants. The subject is asked via interview technique to indicate the area he/she is feeling pain.
3, 6, 12 Months
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 Months
Change from baseline of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
3, 6, 12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Patrice Horwath, InSightec

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Exablate treatment

3
Subscribe